长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (02): 394-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201802019

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

一种基于代表性样点的钉螺密度抽样调查设计方法

汪训平1,2,赵安1,2*   


  1. (1. 江西师范大学鄱阳湖湿地与流域研究教育部重点实验室,江西 南昌 330022;
    2.江西师范大学地理与环境学院,江西 南昌 330022)
  • 出版日期:2018-02-20

  A Sampling Method Based on the Representative Sampling Sites for  Estimating the Density of Oncomelania hupensis

WANG Xun-ping1,2, ZHAO An1,2   

  1.  
    (1.Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research, Ministry of Education, Jiangxi Normal University,
    Nanchang 330022, China;2. School of Geography and Environmental Sciences,
    Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China)
  • Online:2018-02-20

摘要:

抽样设计是钉螺调查的关键环节,直接影响到统计推断的总体精度。目前湖沼型血吸虫病流行区钉螺调查常用的系统抽样设计方法存在样本量大、代表性不强、抽样效率不高等问题。通过对与钉螺空间分布上具有协同变化的环境因子进行模糊聚类分析,寻找可代表钉螺空间分布的代表性样点,提出一种基于代表性样点的抽样设计方法。将本研究设计的方法应用于鄱阳湖区恒湖农场茶叶港草洲的钉螺抽样设计研究,对采集的代表性样点进行误差分析,并将抽样结果与简单随机抽样和系统抽样方法进行精度比较。结果显示:本研究提出的“基于代表性样点的钉螺抽样设计方法(SORS)”明显优于简单随机抽样和系统抽样,抽样绝对误差分别为:0.440 7、1.551 4、3.565 3,相对误差分别为:1.048 1、3.689 7、8.479 6。本研究表明新方法能够获得比现有血防部门的钉螺调查方法更高的估算精度,可为优化湖沼型血吸虫病流行区钉螺调查方法提供借鉴。
关键词: 模糊聚类;抽样设计;代表性样点;钉螺

Abstract:

Sampling site design plays a vital role in the survey of oncomelania hupensis, and directly affects the accuracy of statistical inference results. Currently, many problems, such as large samples demanded, poor representativeness and low efficiency in the traditional systematic sampling method in the marshland schistosomiasis epidemic area were met.  This research proposed a spatial sampling method of oncomelania survey based on the representative samples-SORS, in which the Fuzzy c-means clustering analysis of snail environmental co-variation was performed to explore the spatial distribution characteristics This method was applied to snail survey in Chayegang marshland of Henghu farm in the Poyang Lake region, error analysis of the collected representative samples was conducted, and a comparison study was made among the outcomes of the SORS, the random sampling method and the traditional systematic sampling method. The results showed that the SORS method proposed was obviously better than the random sampling method and the traditional systematic sampling method, the absolute errors of snail number are 0.440 7, 1.551 4 and 3.565 3, the relative errors of snail number are 1.048 1, 3.689 7 and 8.479 6, respectively. It implies the new snail sampling method could obtain higher estimation accuracy than the current snail survey method, which could provide new scientific basis for optimization of snail survey method in the marshland schistosomiasis epidemic area in China.
Key words:fuzzy c-means clustering; representative sampling points; sampling design; Oncomelania hupensis

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[2] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[3] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[4] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[5] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[6] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[7] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[8] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .
[9] 罗璐琴, 周敬宣, 李湘梅. 生态足迹动态预测模型构建与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 440 .
[10] 刘德富,黄钰铃,| 王从锋,. 水工学的发展趋势——从传统水工学到生态水工学[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 92 -96 .