长江流域资源与环境 >> 2018, Vol. 27 >> Issue (10): 2260-2269.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201810012

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

 

不同鱼类养殖方式对长江中游湖泊浮游植物群落的影响及其季节动态

 

张映雪1,2, 王瑞1,2, 屈霄1,2, 夏文彤1,2, 辛未1, 郭传波1, 陈宇顺1,2*   

  1.  

    1.中国科学院水生生物研究所淡水生态与生物技术国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉430072

    2.中国科学院大学,北京100049

  • 出版日期:2018-10-20 发布日期:2018-11-16

 

Effects of Fish Culture on Phytoplankton Communities and Seasonal Dynamcis in Lakes Along the Middle Yangtze River

 

ZHANG Yingxue1,2, WANG Rui1,2, QU Xiao1,2, XIA Wentong1,2, XIN Wei1, GUO Chuanbo1, CHEN Yushun1,2   

  1.  

    (1. State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of

    Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Online:2018-10-20 Published:2018-11-16

摘要: 湖泊鱼类养殖是非常重要的一种水产养殖方式,然而不同鱼类养殖和管理方式对湖泊浮游植物群落的影响及其季节动态尚不明确。20163~20171月按季度调研了长江中游9个湖泊的浮游植物,所研究湖泊包括以下4组:水库极低密度放养组(SR组)、禁养组(SN组)、低密度养殖组(SL组)和高密度养殖组(SH组)。研究表明:4组湖泊共鉴定出浮游植物8110属,以绿藻、硅藻和蓝藻为主。水库组优势种季节演替明显,其余3组均存在比较稳定的优势种,其中禁养组与高密度养殖组为平裂藻,低密度养殖组为假鱼腥藻。4组湖泊浮游植物丰度的季节变化规律不同,依赖于蓝藻优势度的变化。根据浮游植物多样性指数判断,4组湖泊水体污染状态(即营养状态)存在季节差异,ShannonWiener指数与Pielou指数对水体污染状态的评价结果较为一致。对4组湖泊四季的浮游植物的数量进行了层序聚类分析与非度量多维尺度分析(NMDS),结果显示水库组单独为一类;禁养组与高密度养殖组除了夏季外,其余季节均为一类。不同鱼类养殖方式对湖泊浮游植物群落的结构及季节动态产生了一定的影响,然而短期的禁养并没有明显改变湖泊浮游植物群落。

Abstract: Fish culture in lakes is a very common and important aquaculture in China but few study reported comprehensive ecological impacts of different fish culture types on lakes. We assessed phytoplankton communities from March, 2016 to January, 2017 seasonally in 9 lakes, which included four groups: reservoir group (group SR), nonaquaculture group (group SN), low stocking aquaculture group (group SL) and high stocking aquaculture group (group SH), along the middle Yangtze River. A total of 110 phytoplankton genera belonging to 8 phyla were collected, among which were mainly Chlorophyta, Bacillariophyta and Cyanophyta. The seasonal succession of major dominant species in the reservoir group was remarkable, while there were stable dominant genera in the nonaquaculture (Merismopedia), low stocking aquaculture (Pseudanabaena) and high stocking aquaculture (Merismopedia) groups. The seasonal patterns of phytoplankton abundance in the four lake groups were different and depended on the dominance of cyanobacteria. According to the phytoplankton diversity index, water pollution (nutrient) status of the four lake groups showed seasonal differences, and the evaluation results of the ShannonWiener index were consistent with those of the Pielou index. Hierarchical cluster analysis and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) showed that lakes in the reservoir group were in the same category in all seasons, and lakes in the nonaquaculture and high stocking groups were in the same category in all seasons except summer. The current study indicated that fish culture had some impacts on phytoplankton communities, but banning from aquaculture in a short time did not significantly change them in lakes.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 聂 坚, 白永平, 孙 克, 王世金. “红三角”地区城镇体系结构分形研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 673 .
[2] 许有鹏,于瑞宏,马宗伟. 长江中下游洪水灾害成因及洪水特征模拟分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 638 -643 .
[3] 刘腊美 龙天渝 李崇明. 三峡水库上游流域非点源颗粒态磷污染负荷研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 320 .
[4] 周国英, 李天才, 徐文华, 孙菁, 马海, 陈桂琛. 多年冻土区工程迹地人工恢复区植物和土壤的矿质元素含量特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(2): 191 .
[5] 印士勇, 娄保锋, 刘辉, 兰静, 袁琳, 张琦, 臧小平. 三峡工程蓄水运用期库区干流水质分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(3): 305 .
[6] 唐建华, 徐建益, 赵升伟, 刘玮祎. 基于实测资料的长江河口南支河段盐水入侵规律分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(06): 677 .
[7] 黄治勇 |牛 奔 |叶丽梅 |姚望玲 |王佑兵. 长江三峡库区极端大雾天气的气候变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(05): 646 .
[8] 许乃银 | 张国伟 | 李 健 | 周治国. 基于GGE双标图和纤维长度选择的长江流域棉花区域试验环境评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(06): 735 .
[9] 胡振鹏, 葛刚, 刘成林. 鄱阳湖湿地植被退化原因分析及其预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(03): 381 .
[10] 孙政国1,2, 陈奕兆2, 居为民3, 周伟4, 李建龙2*. 我国南方不同类型草地生产力及对气候变化的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(04): 609 .