长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (04): 903-916.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201904016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

大城市边缘区土地利用变化对生境质量的影响评价——基于生态网络视角

何建华1,2,王春晓1,刘殿锋1,2*, 程航1, 石青青3    

  1. (1. 武汉大学资源与环境科学学院,湖北 武汉 430079;2. 武汉大学地理信息系统教育部重点实验室,
    湖北 武汉 430079;3.河南大学环境与规划学院,河南 开封 475001)
  • 出版日期:2019-04-20 发布日期:2019-05-09

Evaluating the Impact of Land Use Change on Habitat Quality in Metropolitan Fringe Areas from A Perspective of Ecological Network

HE Jian-hua1,2, WANG Chun-xiao1, LIU Dian-feng1,2, CHENG Hang1, SHI Qing-qing3   

  1. (1. School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China; 2. Key Laboratory of 
    Geographic Information System, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China; 
    3. College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China)
  • Online:2019-04-20 Published:2019-05-09

摘要: 大城市边缘区土地利用变化迅速,从生态网络与物种角度分析土地利用变化对生境质量的影响更具有生态学意义。选取位于大城市边缘区的鄂州市为研究区,以具有经济、科学研究价值的普通翠鸟、棕背伯劳、池鹭为目标物种,依据目标物种栖息地条件划定生境斑块,以鸟类的最大迁移距离为连接阈值构建生态网络,从生境斑块景观格局与生态网络连通性变化两个层次入手,分析2004~2014年期间土地利用变化对生境质量的影响作用。结果表明:鄂州市建设用地与林地面积增加、水体面积减少,2004~2009年林地面积增长更加显著,2009~2014年水体面积下降较为明显,土地利用景观格局不断破碎化。从斑块角度分析,鄂州市生境质量呈下降趋势,林地生境质量先上升后下降,水体生境质量下降比林地更为明显;从连通性角度分析,生境质量表现为先上升后降低的倒“U”结构。斑块面积对维持网络连通性与生境质量具有重要作用,新城区开发、基础设施建设对林地与水体的分割、占用是典型斑块周边生境质量变化的主要原因。因此,鄂州市发展中应注重大型生境斑块的保护,将其设为禁止或限制开发区,同时也应保护“垫脚石”斑块以维持网络的连通性,提高大都市边缘地区的生态环境质量。


Abstract: Land use change in metropolitan fringe area occurs frequently. It is of great significance to analyze the impact of land use change on the habitat quality from a perspective of ecological network and species. We took Ezhou City, a metropolitan fringe area in central China, as a case study, and selected Alcedo bengalensis, Rufous-Backed Shrike, Chinese Pond Heron as target species, and constructed the ecological networks based on the habitat conditions and migration distance of the target species. Based on the two scales of landscape pattern and the connectivity of ecological network, we evaluated the impact of land use change on habitat quality from 2004 to 2014.The results indicate that, the area of construction land in Ezhou increased, the area of forest land increased significantly during 2004-2009, the water decreased significantly during 2009-2014, and the land use was continuously fragmented. From the perspective of the patch, habitats quality showed a downgrading trend. Forest habitats quality represented first increased and then decreased shape, and water habitat quality downward was more obviously. Habitat quality showed an inverted "U" structure which first increased and then decreased from the perspective of connectivity. Patch plays an important role in maintaining network connectivity and habitat quality. The construction of new urban area and infrastructure result in the segmentation of forest land and water,which is the major reason for the surrounding quality change of the typical patch. Therefore, urban planners should pay more attentions to the protection of large habitat patches, which should be prohibited and restricted as the development zone. Meanwhile, in order to improve the ecological environment quality of metropolitan fringe area, “stepping-stones” patches should be protected to maintain network connectivity.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 解晓南,许朋柱,秦伯强. 太湖流域苏锡常地区地面沉降若干问题探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 125 -131 .
[2] 彭长青,冯金飞,卞新民. 基于遗传算法和GIS的县域水田种植制度空间布局优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 66 -70 .
[3] 王学雷,许厚泽,蔡述明. 长江中下游湿地保护与流域生态管理[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 564 -568 .
[4] 徐长义,钟登华,曹广晶. 我国水电可持续发展的理性思考[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 535 .
[5] 王毛兰,| 胡春华,周文斌,. 丰水期鄱阳湖氮磷含量变化及来源分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 138 .
[6] 罗专溪,朱波,汪涛,唐家良,王冬,辛伟. 紫色土坡地泥沙养分与泥沙流失的耦合特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 379 .
[7] 梅 艳, 刘友兆, 梁流涛. 基于相对承载力的区域可持续发展研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 341 .
[8] 李 生,张守攻,姚小华,任华东. 黔中石漠化地区不同土地利用方式对土壤环境的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 384 .
[9] 陈振杰, 李满春, 刘永学. 基于GIS的桐庐县农村居民点空间格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 180 .
[10] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .