长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (06): 1324-1333.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201906008

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

武汉市典型绿地植被类型对表层土壤入渗和持水性能的影响

杨  倩1,刘目兴1,2, 王苗苗1, 张海林1,2,朱  强1,2,易  军1,2*   

  1. (1. 地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉430079;2. 华中师范大学可持续发展研究中心, 湖北 武汉430079)
  • 出版日期:2019-06-20 发布日期:2019-06-20

Characterization of Surface Soil Water Infiltration and Retention Capacity in Urban Green Space of Wuhan City

YANG Qian1, LIU Mu-xing1, WANG Miao-miao1,2, ZHANG Hai-lin1,2, ZHU Qiang1,2, YI Jun1,2   

  1. (1. Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation, Hubei Province, Wuhan 430079, China;
    2. Research Institute for Sustainable Development of CCNU, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)
  • Online:2019-06-20 Published:2019-06-20

摘要: 合理的绿地植被建设和管理是提高城市蓄水能力和减少城市内涝的重要途径。该文以武汉市城区8种代表性绿地植被的表层土壤为研究对象,通过测定土壤理化性质和水力学特征参数,量化了不同类型绿地植被对表层土壤水分入渗和保持性能的影响,并揭示了土壤理化性质对其影响的机制。结果表明:不同植被类型表层土壤水分入渗性能和持水能力差异显著,天然香樟林、玉兰园、桂花园和牡丹园具有较好的入渗性能,表现为较高的饱和导水率(179.70~441.69 cm/d),其次是人工草坪(31.53~126.60 cm/d),而樱花园、梅花园和桃李园的入渗性能最差(22.40~57.99 cm/d)。天然香樟林土壤持水能力最强,表现为最高的田间持水量(0.315~0.336 cm3/cm3)和最大有效含水量(0.170~0.177 cm3/cm3),其次是玉兰园、桂花园、牡丹园、梅花园和桃李园,持水量、有效含水量分别为:0.241~0.289 cm3/cm3,0.144~0.182 cm3/cm3,而樱花园和草坪的持水能力最弱(0.209~0.254 cm3/cm3,0.139~0.165cm3/cm3)。土壤饱和导水率与总孔隙度、非毛管孔隙度呈显著正相关关系,与容重呈显著负相关关系。而容重、总孔隙度、砂粒和粘粒含量是影响土壤水分特征的主要因素。可以通过乔灌木林下种植草本植物、减少人为践踏,以及适时翻耕等方式提高绿地土壤的入渗与保水能力,进而提高其降雨存蓄功能,减少城市内涝。

Abstract: Reasonable green space vegetation construction and management is an effective way to increase urban water storage capacity and reduce urban waterlog.Eight urban green space locations characterized by different vegetation types in the Wuhan city were selected to collect the surface soil samples. The effects of green space vegetation types on water infiltration rate and water retention capacity of surface soils were quantified by measuring the soil physiochemical properties and hydraulic parameters.Furthermore, the relationships between the physiochemical properties and hydraulic parameters were analyzed. The results showed that significant differences of soil water infiltration rate and retention capacity were observed among the eight urban green space locations.The highest infiltration rate was observed in the natural camphor forest, magnolia garden, osmanthusfragrans garden, and peony garden(179.70-441.69 cm/d), characterized by the highest saturated hydraulic conductivity(Ks), followed by the artificial grassland(31.53-126.60 cm/d), and the lowest in sakura garden, plum garden, and peaches mixed plums garden(22.40-57.99 cm/d). The highest soil water retention capacity was observed in the natural camphor forest,characterized by the highest field water capacity(0.315-0.336 cm3/cm3) and the maximum effective water content(0.170-0.177cm3/cm3), followed by themagnolia garden,osmanthusfragrans garden, peony garden, plum garden and peaches mixed plums garden(0.241-0.289 cm3/cm3,0.144-0.182cm3/cm3), and the lowest in the sakura garden and artificial grassland(0.209-0.254 cm3/cm3,0.139-0.165 cm3/cm3).Significantly positive correlations were observed between Ks and soil total porosity/non-capillary porosity, and a significantly negative correlation between Ks and soil bulk density. The soil water retention capacity was mainly affected by the bulk density, total porosity, sand content,and clay content.The practices of planting herbaceous under the wood plants, reduce trampling, and addition soil tillage could be applied for the urban green space construction, which could improve the effects of rainfall conservation and reduce urban waterlog by enhancing the water infiltration rate and water retention capacity of surface soil.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 罗专溪,张 远,郑丙辉,富 国,陆兆华. 三峡水库蓄水初期水生态环境特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 781 -784 .
[2] 李晓文,方精云,朴世龙. 上海城市土地利用形成、变化及其空间作用机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 34 -40 .
[3] 李加林,许继琴,童亿勤,杨晓平,张殿发. 杭州湾南岸滨海平原土地利用/覆被空间格局变化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 709 -713 .
[4] 李玉辉,李忠德,张丹丹,李兆林 ,周顺吉. 石林风景名胜区对乡村经济发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 18 -23 .
[5] 杨志荣,吴次芳, 靳相木, 姚秋萍. 基于DEA模型的城市用地经济效益比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 14 .
[6] 郭蔚华, 王柱. 三峡大坝175米实验性蓄水期间春季嘉陵江出口段硅藻变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(z1): 101 .
[7] 王修信|朱启疆|梁宗经. 漓江上游植被覆盖度时空变化对地表热场影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(12): 1502 .
[8] 金 妍 | 车 越 | 杨 凯. 基于最小累积阻力模型的江南水乡河网分区保护研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(01): 8 .
[9] 陈峰峰|李秋华|焦树林|龙健|刘送平|李小峰|高廷进. 百花湖入库河流麦西河河口消落带土壤磷形态及其分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(04): 486 .
[10] 刘桂林,张落成,张倩. 苏南地区建设用地扩展类型及景观格局分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(10): 1375 .