长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (08): 1872-1885.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201908011

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

安徽省黄山市绿色发展时空趋势研究

黄素珍1,鲁  洋1,杨晓英1,李小港2*   

  1. (1.复旦大学环境科学与工程系,上海 200438;2.江西省辐射环境监督站,江西 南昌 330077)
  • 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-08-19

Study on Spatio-temporal Trends of the Green Development of Huangshan City in Anhui Province

HUANG Su-zhen1,LU Yang1, YANG Xiao-ying1, LI Xiao-gang2   

  1. (1.Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University,  Shanghai 200438,China; 2.Jiangxi Province Radiation Environment Supervision Station, Nanchang 330077, China)
  • Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-08-19

摘要: 基于《安徽省绿色发展指标体系》,结合黄山市的具体经济、社会与环境特征,设计包括6项一级指标和33项二级指标的黄山市绿色发展指标体系,运用基于群决策的层次分析法确定各级绿色发展指标的权重。基于2004~2016年统计数据,评估黄山市及各县区绿色发展水平的时空变化趋势与特征,利用聚类分析和主成分分析确定造成黄山市县区绿色发展时空差异的主导因素。结果表明:(1)2004~2016年黄山市及各区县绿色发展水平整体呈现上升趋势,究其原因,主要在于生态保护和增长质量这2方面绿色发展指数的显著增加。(2)黄山市各县区的绿色发展时空差异较大。造成2016年黄山市各县区绿色发展水平差异的指标主要集中于土地覆盖与土地利用、资源利用效率和污染物排放量。(3)2004~2016年间,黄山市在资源利用、环境治理和绿色生活指数方面进步有限,建议黄山市近期可以将其绿色发展工作重点置于提高能源和水资源利用效率、降低能耗、减少各主要污染物排放量和促进绿色出行等方面。

Abstract: Based on the Anhui Province Green Development Index System as well as local economic, social and environmental characteristics, a new green development assessment system was established for the Huangshan city including six first-level and 33 second-level indicators. The analytic hierarchy method based on group decision making was then used to calculate the weight of each indicator. The spatiotemporal trends and characteristics of the green development of the Huangshan City as well as its 7 counties and districts were evaluated based on statistics from 2004 to 2016. Finally, Principal Component Analysis and Clustering Analysis were used to determine the dominant factors leading to the spatiotemporal differences in the green development of Huangshan City and its counties and districts. Study results have shown that due to the improvement in ecological protection and growth quality, there had been an overall increasing trend in the green development of Huangshan City and its counties and districts between 2004 and 2016. Secondly, there had been much spatiotemporal variation in the green development of the counties and districts of Huangshan City. The dominant factors leading to the variations in the green development of the counties and districts of the Huangshan City in 2016 included land use and land cover, resource use efficiency, and pollutant emissions. Thirdly, there had been limited progress in resource utilization, environmental governance, and green living in Huangshan City from 2004 to 2016. Therefore, it is suggested that Huangshan City should put improving energy and water use efficiency, cutting energy consumption, reducing pollutant emissions, and promoting green commuting in priority to push its green development process in the near future.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 许峰, 祁士华, 高媛, 邢新丽. 绵阳市代表性点位土壤多环芳烃剖面分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 192 .
[2] 解晓南,许朋柱,秦伯强. 太湖流域苏锡常地区地面沉降若干问题探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(1): 125 -131 .
[3] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[4] 林 康. 长江三角洲人口集聚与布局探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 654 -658 .
[5] 李宽意,刘正文,王春忠,王传海,史加达,胡耀辉. 低溶解氧对苦草生长的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 670 -673 .
[6] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[7] 王宜虎. 江苏沿江各市工业绿色化程度的模糊评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 170 .
[8] 艾学山,范文涛. 水库生态调度模型及算法研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 451 .
[9] 罗专溪,朱波,汪涛,唐家良,王冬,辛伟. 紫色土坡地泥沙养分与泥沙流失的耦合特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 379 .
[10] 梅 艳, 刘友兆, 梁流涛. 基于相对承载力的区域可持续发展研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 341 .