长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (4): 950-963.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202004016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江中下游流域人类活动强度及其对湿地景观格局影响研究

贾艳艳1,唐晓岚1,2*,唐芳林3*,杨阳1,马坤1
  

  1. (1. 南京林业大学风景园林学院,江苏 南京 210037;2. 南京林业大学中国特色生态文明建设与林业发展研究院,江苏 南京 210037;3. 国家林业和草原局国家公园观测研究中心,云南 昆明 650216)
  • 出版日期:2020-04-20 发布日期:2020-06-12

Research on Human Activity Intensity and Its Impact on Wetland Landscape Pattern in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Basin

JIA Yan-yan1, TANG Xiao-lan1,2, TANG Fang-lin3, YANG Yang1, MA Kun1   

  1. (1. College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;2. Academy of Chinese Ecological Progress and Forestry Studies, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;3. Kunming Survey and Design Institute of State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Kunming 650216, China)

  • Online:2020-04-20 Published:2020-06-12

摘要: 摘要: 目前关于大尺度下人类活动强度对湿地景观格局影响的研究较少,为揭示长江中下游流域湿地景观格局与人类活动强度的关系,以1995~2015年的土地利用数据为基础,综合运用人类活动强度模型和景观指数等方法,分析研究区人类活动强度演变特征、湿地景观格局特征及人类活动强度对湿地景观格局的影响。结果表明:(1)人类活动高强度带面积增加,低强度带面积减少;1995~2015年,各强度带的人类活动强度平均值均呈增长趋势,强度带等级越高,平均值增幅越大。(2)20年间,湿地面积不断增加,占比分别为5.14%、5.27%和5.30%;湖泊和沼泽地分别减少了70.73 km2和216.53 km2,而水库坑塘面积增加了1 155.32 km2,对湿地增加的贡献率达94.75%,研究期主要是人工湿地在扩张,而自然湿地在萎缩;湿地景观的破碎度减弱,景观多样性减少。(3)伴随人类活动强度的增强湿地相对变化呈“收缩”效应,且在人类活动强度越高的区域,“收缩”效应越明显;随着人类活动强度降低,湿地景观破碎度减弱,聚集度下降,景观多样性增强,景观形状趋于复杂。研究结果可为长江中下游湿地保护和人类活动管控提供决策支持。

Abstract: Abstract:At present, there were few researches on the influence of human activity intensity on wetland landscape pattern at large scale. To reveal the relationship between the wetland landscape pattern in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin and human activity intensity, the paper took the land use data of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin from 1995 to 2015 as data sources. Human activity intensity of land surface (HAILS), and landscape index were comprehensively used to analyze the evolution characteristics of human activity intensity, wetland landscape pattern characteristics and the influence of human activity intensity on wetland landscape pattern. The results showed that: (1) The area of high human activity intensity zone increased, while the area of low human activity intensity zone decreased; the average value of each human activity intensity zone showed an increasing trend from 1995 to 2015, and the higher of the intensity zone grade, the greater of the increasing range of average value. (2) In the past 20 years, the wetland area has been increasing, accounting for 5.14%, 5.27% and 5.30% respectively; lakes and marshes have decreased by 70.73 km2 and 216.53 km2 respectively, while the area of reservoir pond has increased by 1 155.32 km2, contributing 94.75% to the increase of wetland. It indicated that artificial wetlands were expanding while natural wetlands were shrinking during the study period. The fragmentation of wetland landscape was weakened, and the landscape diversity was decreased. (3) The relative change of wetlands showed a ‘contraction’ effect with the increase of human activity intensity, and the higher human activity intensity, the more obvious of the ‘contraction’ effect. With the decrease of human activity intensity, the fragmentation of wetland landscape was weakened, the aggregation reduced, the landscape diversity enhanced and the landscape shape tended to be complex. The research results can provide decision support for wetland protection and human activity control in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 周金星, 魏 远, 漆良华, 张旭东. 基于ISODATA法的三峡库区生态区划[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 446 .
[2] 栾青杉, 孙军. 2005年秋季长江口及其邻近水域浮游植物群集[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 202 .
[3] 郑超磊| 刘苏峡, 舒 畅, 张守红. 泥曲河道内最小生态需水研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 329 .
[4] 凡非得| 王克林 | 宣 勇 | 岳跃民. 西南喀斯特区域生态环境敏感性评价及其空间分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(11): 1394 .
[5] 谭雪, 郑思悦, 买亚宗, 石磊, 马中. 千岛湖配水工程的环境成本估算——基于调水区支付意愿调查[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(11): 1826 -1833 .
[6] 童庆蒙 张露 张俊飚. 土地流转能否提升农民生活满意度?——来自湖北省江汉平原地区的经验证据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[7] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[8] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[9] 屈小娥. 中国生态效率的区域差异及影响因素——基于时空差异视角的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[10] 孙传谆, 甄霖, 刘小玲, 刘通, 吴顺辉, 李景刚. 小尺度上蜜蜂传粉服务与耕地利用集约水平之间权衡关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 112 -121 .