长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (1): 87-96.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202101009

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

安徽省森林生态承载力及其重心迁移研究

李  岩1,黄超傑2,王  珂 3,王禹婷1,张大红1*   

  1. (1.北京林业大学经济管理学院, 北京 100083;2.中山大学地理科学与规划学院,广东 广州 510220;3.中外园林建设有限公司, 北京 100040)
  • 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2021-02-04

Forest Ecological Carrying Capacity Evaluation and Gravity Center Transfer Analysis in Anhui Province

LI Yan 1,HUANG Chao-jie 2,WANG Ke 3,WANG Yu-ting 1,ZHANG Da-hong 1   

  1. (1 College of Economics and Management,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China;2 School of Geography and Planning,Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou 510220,China;3 Landscape Architecture Corporation of China,Beijing 100040,China)
  • Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-02-04

摘要: 以安徽省72个区县为研究样本,基于PSR(Pressure-State-Response)模型,运用熵权法与专家法确定综合权重,根据综合指数法计算森林生态承载力指数,并对2001~2016年安徽省森林生态承载力进行时空分析,同时在GIS技术支持下对安徽省县域森林生态承载力重心轨迹的演变规律进行研究。结果表明:安徽省森林生态承载力状况整体上得到了很大改善,全省大部分区县处于可载等级;政府林业投资强度、天然林保护面积占比、退耕还林面积占比、林分结构等指标权重较大;省内森林生态承载力水平分布不均衡,超载地区主要分布在皖北平原地区,可载地区则大多分布在皖西南山区;森林生态承载力重心在2001~2006年从西北向东南方向迁移,2006~2009年从东南向东北方向迁移,2009~2016再次向东南方向迁移,且迁移的速度明显加快。

Abstract: Taking case of Anhui’s 72 counties, the paper is based on PSR model. Forest ecological carrying capacity is evaluated and compared from 2001 to 2016 by entropy weight and expert method and comprehensive index to analyze spatial variability of the the forest ecological carrying capacity, and gravity analysis model is used to explore evolution law of the forest ecological carrying capacity gravity center in Anhui province based on GIS.The results show that government forestry investment intensity, the proportion of natural forest protected area,proportion of converted farmland to forest area and forest structure index weight are bigger.Anhui forest ecological carrying capacity index is better overall, most counties in the province are in the loading grade.however, its distribution is unbalanced in the different counties and the southwest forest ecological carrying capacity is the highest, the north is lowest.The forest ecological carrying capacity gravity center shifted from northwest to southeast from 2001 to 2006, and thereafter moved from the southeast to northeast from 2006 to 2009,at last it migrated to the southeast again until 2016 and the speed of migration was obviously accelerated.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 钱建平,周 勇,杨信廷. 基于遥感和信息熵的城乡结合部范围界定——以荆州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 451 .
[2] 徐昌新|阮禄章|胡振鹏|李述. 鄱阳湖越冬鸟类种群动态与保护研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(03): 407 .
[3] 闫东升, 杨槿, 陈雯. 失地农民生活满意度测度及影响因素研究——以南京市仙林新村为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1450 .
[4] 张婷, 王学雷, 耿军军, 班璇, 杨超, 吕晓蓉. 基于MIKE21和灰色模式识别模型的洪湖水质模拟与评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2090 -2100 .
[5] 陈叶华, 李志威, 沈小雄, . 芭蕉湖-南湖连通工程的连通性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 731 -738 .
[6] 高艳丽, 董 捷, 李 璐, 李红波. 碳排放权交易政策的有效性及作用机制研究——基于建设用地碳排放强度省际差异视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 783 -793 .
[7] 黄隆杨, 刘胜华, 李健. 城市生态用地时空动态及其相关驱动力——以武汉市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1059 -1069 .
[8] 魏小芳, 赵宇鸾, 李秀彬, 薛朝浪, 夏四友. 基于“三生功能”的长江上游城市群国土空间特征及其优化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1070 -1079 .
[9] 邹润彦, 周宏冀, 郭熙, 但承龙, 吕添贵, 李洪义. 环鄱阳湖区农田土壤有机碳影响因素空间分布格局分析及制图研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1121 -1131 .
[10] 秦 腾, 章恒全, 佟金萍. 安徽省用水网络管理与关键区域界定[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1304 -1313 .