长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (05): 1059-1069.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201905006

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市生态用地时空动态及其相关驱动力——以武汉市为例

黄隆杨,刘胜华*,李健   

  1. (1.武汉大学资源与环境科学学院, 湖北 武汉 430079)
  • 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2019-05-22

Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Urban Ecological Land Use and Its Related Driving Forces: A Case Study of Wuhan City

HUANG Long-yang,LIU Sheng-hua,LI Jian   

  1. (1 School of Resource and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)
  • Online:2019-05-20 Published:2019-05-22

摘要: 城市生态用地是维持城市生态安全和可持续发展的重要屏障,研究其动态变化特征及相关驱动力,将为城市规划和生态环境保护决策提供依据。该文以武汉城区为实证区,采用1990、2002、2014年等3期Landsat遥感影像为数据源,采用土地利用变化矩阵量化数量变化,景观格局指数量化空间格局变化,生态服务价值系数和InVEST模型量化质量变化,利用二元逻辑回归模型和梯度分析法量化相关驱动力。研究结果表明:武汉市生态用地总面积持续下降,累计减少239.55 km2,其中水域为主要转出地类;生境质量下降24%;生态用地斑块破碎度提高,“孤岛化”现象逐渐显现;坡度、建设用地的最小距离、建设用地增长、GDP增长和道路密度是驱动生态用地变化的主要因素,随着城市向三环线外扩张,三环线以外的生态用地面临较高的生态转化风险。

Abstract: Ecological land plays essential roles in ensuring urban ecological security and promoting regional sustainable development. Hence, understanding the dynamic and driving forces of urban ecological land use change is of great significance to urban planning and ecological environmental protection. In this study, we proposed an integrated framework to modelling the dynamic and driving forces of urban ecological land use change. The land use matrix, landscape metrics, ecological service value and INVEST model were used to analyze the dynamics of ecological land use in terms of quantity, spatial pattern and ecosystem function respectively. Besides, the binary logistic regression model and gradient analysis approach were employed to modelling the driving forces of urban ecological land use change. Our experiments were conducted in Wuhan City, China. The results of our study demonstrated that between 1990 and 2014, the area of ecological land in Wuhan City lost 239.55  km2, and the quality of habitats also decreased by 24%. On the contrary, the fragmentation of ecological land plaques increased, which leads to the phenomenon of islanding. The results also illustrated that slope, the minimum distance to builtup area, the growth of built up area, GDP, and road density are the main drivers of urban ecological land use change in Wuhan. Consequently, with the continuous growth of Wuhan City, the risk of loss of ecological land, which located outside 3rd ring road of Wuhan, is increasing.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张 虹. 三峡重庆库区消落区基本特征与生态功能分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 374 .
[2] 庄建琦, 崔鹏. 基于BP神经网络泥石流沟发育阶段的判定[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(9): 849 .
[3] 梁益同, 夏智宏, 柳晶辉, 黄靖. 基于RS和GIS的2008年长江中下游雪灾监测——以湖北省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(9): 881 .
[4] 沈 竞| 王 浩. 景观格局变化表征及驱动力相关性的定量化研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(Z2): 85 .
[5] 王彬俨, 严冬春, 文安邦, 陈佳村. 三峡水库干流消落带沉积泥沙粒径特征及其物源意义[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1421 -1429 .
[6] 李丹, 郭生练, 洪兴骏, 郭靖. 汉江流域1960~2014年降雨极值时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1448 -1456 .
[7] 郁鸿胜. 书评:《长江经济带协同创新研究:创新·合作·空间·治理》[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(01): 158 .
[8] 刘燕, 王业成, 王让会, 刘圆, 袁琦菲, 李成. 南京浦口区大气负离子的时空特征及其与气象条件的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 706 -712 .
[9] 王 磊, 李成丽.  

我国中部地区城市群多中心结构的增长效应 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2231 -2240 .

[10] 张英浩, 陈江龙, 程 钰. 环境规制对中国区域绿色经济效率的影响机理研究——基于超效率模型和空间面板计量模型实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2407 -2418 .