长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (8): 1819-1828.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202108004

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江集装箱港口岸线利用空间格局及其对资源环境的影响

刘玮辰1,曹有挥1* ,吴  威1 ,郭嘉颖1,2   

  1. (1.中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所,江苏 南京 210008;2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049)
  • 出版日期:2021-08-20 发布日期:2021-09-06

Spatial Pattern of Container Terminal Water Front Utilization and Its Resource & Environment Effects in the Yangtze River

LIU Wei-chen 1, CAO You-hui 1, WU Wei 1, GUO Jia-ying 1,2   

  1. (1. Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
  • Online:2021-08-20 Published:2021-09-06

摘要: 长江岸线资源是沿江地区社会经济发展的重要支撑,同时其处于水陆交界地带有着无法替代的生态价值。通过遥感影像解译和相关数据资料汇总分析现代化航运组成之一的集装箱港口岸线利用格局,探究其对生态保护岸段的影响及成因,讨论如何合理组织港口岸线以实现绿色发展。长江集装箱港口岸线规模研究时段内大幅提升,上中下游分别形成各自较为密集的分布区域,集装箱港口更替以小型减量为主并将增量重心向大中型倾斜;港口岸线利用持续增长加速对保护岸段侵占,中小型港口为最主要占用类型,部分既有港口因所在城市大部分可利用岸段位于保护区内而留存;集装箱港口开发利用与保护间关系演变存在阶段性,岸线资源管理缺乏统筹协调,两者间冲突不可避免并已大量发生,但研究时段内港口扩张逐渐放缓、矛盾出现缓和,今后需更细致进行港口开发与岸线保护工作,提升综合管理能力。

Abstract: The water front resources of the Yangtze River are important to support the socio-economic development along the Yangtze River. At the same time, they are at the border between water and land with irreplaceable ecological value. The purpose of this paper is to estimate the scale of the water front utilization of container ports in the mainstream of the Yangtze River and analyze the water front organizational structure and change characteristics of container ports by analyzing remote sensing images and related data. Based on this, various types of environmental protection areas are used as representative items to explore the impact of container port shipping on water front resources and the environment. Also, how to coordinate the rational organization of productive water fronts to achieve the unity of development and protection under the pressure of the Yangtze River resources for environmental pressure is discussed in this paper. The conclusions are as follows:The scale of the water front of the Yangtze River container port has increased significantly during the study period. The scale of container ports in the downstream region occupies the highest share in the region, while the utilization rate of the upper and middle regions is growing faster. The upper, middle and lower reaches respectively form a relatively dense distribution area of container ports and terminals. Large ports are often located downstream with a continuous development trend, while large or very large ports are only located in the central and upper reaches of the hub city. The development of container ports has a large-scale trend. The replacement of ports is mainly based on small-scale reductions, and the center of gravity of newly-built, reconstructed and expanded ports is inclined to large and medium-sized. The port water front continued to grow while accelerating the invasion of protected shore sections. The scale and proportion of the newly-occupied docks have reached a relatively high level, and many ports and docks have to be kept because most of the available shores in their cities are located in protected areas. Few of the demolished ports are directly related to the environment protection, and there are still a certain number of small and medium-sized ports located in the protected area. As a new type of water front utilization, the construction and operation of container ports should meet the requirements of environmental friendliness and reverse the opposite relationship between development and protection. The relationship can be summed up as two stages of conflict and mitigation. The conflict between ports development and protection is inevitable. The transport capacity of container ports occupying the protected areas has reached a considerable scale. However, during the study period, especially after 2015, the port expansion slowed down and the main direction was to improve the efficiency of water front utilization. The relationship between development and protection has eased. In the subsequent construction of container ports, it is necessary to make the overall use of the water front and correctly handle the relationship between development and protection. Meanwhile, various development activities must meet environmental protection requirements.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 沈雪, 张露, 张俊飚, 骆兰翎. 稻农低碳生产行为影响因素与引导策略——基于人际行为改进理论的多组比较分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2042 -2052 .
[2] 马坤, 唐晓岚, 刘思源, 王奕文, 任宇杰, 刘小涵. 长江流域国家级保护地空间分布特征及其国家公园廊道空间策略研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2053 -2069 .
[3] 文高辉 杨钢桥. 耕地细碎化对农地整治农户土地权属调整意愿的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[4] 马剑锋, 佟金萍, 王慧敏, 王 圣. 长江经济带农业用水全局技术效率的空间效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2757 -2765 .
[5] 谢贤鑫 陈美球 . 农户生态耕种采纳意愿及其异质性分析—基于TPB框架的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 邢璐平, 方斌, 向梦杰, . 基于GWR模型的江苏省耕地集约利用水平时空变化特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 376 -386 .
[7] 刘宇, 赵亮, . 基于过程—效应—功能—服务级联机制的森林减沙服务传输研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 883 -892 .
[8] 刘帅, 何青, 谢卫明, 郭磊城, 沈芳. 近15年来长江口控制站徐六泾悬沙变化特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1197 -1204 .
[9] 李景保, 于丹丹, 张瑞, 杨波, 代稳, 何蒙, 徐志. 近61年来长江荆南三口水系连通性演变特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1214 -1224 .
[10] 罗燊, 余斌, 张向敏. 乡村生活空间网络结构特征与优化——以江汉平原典型乡建片区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(07): 1725 -1735 .