长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (9): 2287-2298.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202109022

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

环境情感与技能对秦巴山区茶叶种植户亲环境行为的影响

薛彩霞, 姚顺波, 李桦   


  1. (西北农林科技大学经济管理学院, 陕西 杨凌 712100)
  • 出版日期:2021-09-20 发布日期:2021-09-27

Study of Impact of Environmental Emotions and Skills on Pro-Environmental Behaviors of Tea Growers in Qinba Mountain Area

XUE Cai-xia,YAO Shun-bo, LI Hua   

  1. (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)
  • Online:2021-09-20 Published:2021-09-27

摘要: 根据环境情感和技能对农户亲环境行为的影响机理,运用秦巴山区498户茶叶种植户的调查数据,采用计数模型分析了环境情感和技能对农户减少污染行为和改善环境行为的影响,并探讨了社会参照规范的调节效应。结果表明:(1)无论是积极情感还是消极情感都对农户改善环境行为影响显著,但仅有积极情感对农户减少污染行为有显著影响;环境技能中的策略知识和行动能力都对农户减少污染行为有显著影响,但只有行动能力对农户改善环境行为影响显著。(2)积极情感在行动能力与农户改善环境行为的关系中具有强化作用,消极情感在行动能力与农户减少污染行为的关系中具有强化作用。(3)社会参照规范在行动能力与农户改善环境行为的关系中存在正向调节效应;社会参照规范在环境情感与农户减少污染行为的关系中存在调节效应,但环境情感的类型不同调节方向不同。

Abstract: According to the influence mechanism of environmental emotions and skills on the pro-environmental behavior of households, using the survey data of 498 tea growers in Qinba Mountain Area, a counting model was used to analyze the impact of environmental emotions and skills on reducing pollution behaviors and improving environmental behaviors of households, and the moderating effect of social reference norms is discussed. The results show that, firstly, both positive and negative emotions have a significant impact on the improving environmental behaviors of households, but only positive emotions have a significant impact on the reducing pollution behaviors of households. The environmental skills including strategic knowledge and action ability have a significant impact on the reducing pollution behaviors of households, but only the action ability has a significant impact on households′ improving environment behavior. Secondly, the positive emotions have a strengthening role in the relationship between action ability and households′ improving environment behavior, and the negative emotions have a strengthening role in the relationship between action ability and households′ reducing pollution behavior. Thirdly, the social reference norm plays a positive moderating effect in the relationship between action capacity and households′ improving environment behavior; the social reference norm has a moderating effect in the relationship between environmental emotions and households′ reducing pollution behaviors, but the different types of environmental emotions have different moderating directions.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] 熊鸿斌, 周凌燕. 基于PSR-灰靶模型的巢湖环湖防洪治理工程生态环境影响评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1977 -1987 .
[3] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[4] 冯 畅, 毛德华, 周 慧, 曹艳敏, 胡光伟. 流域绿水管理博弈建模及应用分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2505 -2517 .
[5] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[6] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[7] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[8] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[9] 赵树成, 张展羽, 夏继红, 杨洁, 盛丽婷, 唐丹, 陈晓安, . 鄱阳湖滨岸土壤磷素吸附特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .
[10] 阮甜, 查芊郁, 杨茹, 高超. 全球升温1.5℃和2.0℃对长江寸滩站以上流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 407 -415 .