长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (10): 2452-2463.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202110013

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于CRITIC-TOPSIS模型的浮梁县土地生态安全时空分异及其障碍因素分析

么泽恩1,蔡海生2,3*,张学玲1,3,曾珩4,邵晖4   

  1. (1.江西农业大学江西省鄱阳湖流域农业资源与生态重点实验室,江西 南昌 330045;2.江西旅游商贸职业学院,江西 南昌 330100;3.江西农业大学富硒农业产业发展研究中心,江西 南昌 330045; 4.江西省土地开发整理中心,江西 南昌 330002)
  • 出版日期:2021-10-20 发布日期:2021-11-05

Spatio-temporal Differentiation and Obstacle Factors of Land Ecological Security in Fuliang County Based on CRITIC-TOPSIS Model

YAO Ze-en1, CAI Hai-sheng2,3, ZHANG Xue-ling1,3,ZENG Heng4, SHAO Hui4   

  1. (1. Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Ecology of Poyang Lake Basin, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China; 2. Jiangxi Vocational College of Tourism and Business, Nanchang 330100, China;3. Research Center of Selenium-Rich Agricultural Industry Development, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China; 
    4. Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center ,Department of Land and Resources of Jiangxi ,Nanchang 330002, China)
  • Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-11-05

摘要: 以江西省浮梁县为研究区域,基于土地利用数据与社会经济数据,从自然条件、人类活动、景观格局3个方面构建评价体系,采用CRITIC-TOPSIS模型研究2000~2018年浮梁县土地生态安全的时空分异状况,并通过障碍度模型,分析影响浮梁县土地生态安全的主要障碍因素。研究结果表明:(1)2000~2018年浮梁县土地生态安全水平呈现小幅度下降的态势,在具体历程上经历了从较好到恶化再到恢复向好的一个过程。(2)浮梁县各乡镇区域土地生态安全状况存在着显著的差异,形成差异的原因也各有不同。较为良好的地区主要集中在东部、中北部,较差的地区呈现围绕县城区聚集的特点,蛟潭镇、湘湖镇两地呈现出特殊性。(3)浮梁县土地生态安全状态受到多种障碍因素的共同影响,在不同时间节点,障碍因素与作用程度也不尽相同,关系较为复杂。水网密度、地形位指数、水土协调指数、人均耕地面积4项障碍因素对浮梁县土地生态安全的影响程度较为突出。

Abstract: Take Fuliang County of Jiangxi Province as the research area.Based on land use data and social and economic data, the evaluation system is constructed from three aspects: natural conditions, human activities and landscape pattern.The spatial and temporal differentiation of land ecological security in Fuliang County from 2000 to 2018 is studied by using the CRITIC-TOPSIS model.The obstacle degree model is used to analyze the main obstacle factors affecting the land ecological security in Fuliang County. The research results show that:(1) From 2000 to 2018, the land ecological security level in Fuliang County showed a small decline, and experienced a process from good to worse and then to better.(2) There are significant differences in the land ecological security conditions among towns in Fuliang County, and the reasons for the differences are also different.The relatively good areas are mainly concentrated in the east and the central -northern part, while the poor towns show the characteristics of clustering around the county and urban areas. Jiaotan Town and Xianghu Town show their particularity.(3) The land ecological security state of Fuliang County is affected by various obstacles. At different time nodes, the obstacles and the degree of action are not the same, and the relationship is complex.Water network density, topographic location index, soil and water coordination index, per capita cultivated land area four obstacle factors to the land ecological security of Fuliang County is more prominent factors.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 滕家喜, 周志翔, 李晨, 胡兴宜, 孙启祥. 石首市抑螺防病林空间布局优化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1430 .
[2] 王锐, 余涛, 杨忠芳, 侯青叶, 曾庆良, 马宏宏. 富硒土壤硒生物有效性及影响因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1460 .
[3] 付书科, 李小帆, 彭甲超, 张子悦, 陈 思. 基于动态因子分析法的长江三角洲城市群城镇化质量测度研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1909 -1918 .
[4] 刘菊 傅斌 张成虎 胡治鹏 王玉宽. 基于InVEST模型的岷江上游生态系统水源涵养量与价值评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 李雪松 龙湘雪 齐晓旭. 长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 张玉韩 吴尚昆 董延涛. 长江经济带矿产资源开发空间格局优化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 李 娟, 董 平, 陆玉麒, 王 毅, 郭 政.  

中原经济区人口与经济空间格局演变研究 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2222 -2231 .

[8] 李 述, 葛 刚, 刘琪璟.  

基于主体功能区规划的江西省城镇化协调发展研究 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2250 -2259 .

[9] 孔锋, 杨萍, 王品, 吕丽莉, 孙劭. 中国灾害性对流天气日数的时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2518 -2528 .
[10] 查凯丽, 刘艳芳, 孔雪松, 田雅丝, 刘耀林, . 村镇路网通达性与空间出行研究——以武汉市李集镇为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2663 -2672 .