长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (10): 2512-2520.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202110018

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

碳排放责任核算研究进展

王猛猛,刘红光*   

  1. (南京农业大学公共管理学院, 江苏 南京  210095)
  • 出版日期:2021-10-20 发布日期:2021-11-05

Progress of Research on the Accounting of Carbon Emission Responsibility

WANG Meng-meng, LIU Hong-guang   

  1. (College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095,China)
  • Online:2021-10-20 Published:2021-11-05

摘要: 如何应对气候变化是实现可持续发展目标的重点议题,而厘清碳排放责任是其中的难点。对不同视角下碳排放责任核算的文献进行系统梳理,分析了该领域的研究现状与发展趋势,探究每种方法的优势与不足,以期为厘清碳排放责任和合理分配碳排放空间提供科学的理论依据。研究发现:(1)现有文献对碳排放责任的核算多从单一角度进行,每种方法都存在一定局限性,如生产责任法会导致“碳泄漏”问题、消费责任法和收入责任法会削弱其他责任主体减排动力;(2)共担视角下的核算方法发展迅速,但还未形成统一的科学性考量准则,仍有待进一步发展。在此基础上提出对未来研究的展望:(1)拓展多原则融合的碳责任核算体系;(2)创新多视角共担的碳责任核算方案;(3)探索碳责任核算与排放权分配的有机结合。


Abstract: It is a key issue in achieving the sustainable development goals that to deal with climate change, in which clarifying carbon emission responsibility is one of the difficulties. In order to provide a scientific theoretical basis for clarifying the responsibility of carbon emission and allocating carbon emission space reasonably, this paper provides a comprehensive review on the literature of the accounting of carbon emission responsibility from different perspectives, and analyzes the research status and trends of development in this field, and probes into the strengths and weaknesses of each method. Our study showed that most of the research on the accounting of carbon emission responsibility is from a single point of view, whereas each method has certain limitations. Such as production-based accounting method will lead to “carbon leakage” and consumption-based and income-based accounting method may weaken the driving force of carbon emission reduction of other subjects which should take responsibilities. The accounting method from the perspective of sharing responsibility develops rapidly, but it has not yet formed recognized scientific criteria of assessment, it needs further development. On the basis of the above research, we put forward some prospects for the future research. Firstly, expand the carbon responsibility accounting system with multi principles integration. For example, the principles of minimum carbon emissions demand and exempting carbon sinks should be included in the accounting system when calculating the responsibility of carbon emission at the provincial level. Secondly, innovate the carbon emission responsibility accounting scheme that shared by multiple responsible subjects. To some extent, it can make up for the limitations of a single accounting perspective, which has important practical value for balancing regional carbon emission responsibility and improving the overall efficiency of carbon emission reduction. Thirdly, explore the combination of the accounting of carbon emission responsibility and the allocation of carbon emission allowance. It is of great significance for breaking down the targets of carbon emission reduction scientifically.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 邱蓓莉,徐长乐,刘洋,徐廷廷. 全球气候变化背景下上海市风暴潮灾害情景下脆弱性评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(s): 149 .
[2] 赵林, 于家烁, 薄岩, 杨娇, 李汉青. 基于SPEI的湖北省近52年干旱时空格局变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1230 -1237 .
[3] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[4] 熊鸿斌, 周凌燕. 基于PSR-灰靶模型的巢湖环湖防洪治理工程生态环境影响评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1977 -1987 .
[5] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[6] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[7] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[8] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[9] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[10] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .