长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (07): 1230-1237.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201507021

• 自然灾害 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于SPEI的湖北省近52年干旱时空格局变化

赵林, 于家烁, 薄岩, 杨娇, 李汉青   

  1. 武汉大学资源与环境科学学院, 湖北 武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-14 修回日期:2014-11-21 出版日期:2015-07-20
  • 作者简介:赵林(1986~),男,讲师,博士,主要从事灾害监测与风险管理方面研究.E-mail:linzhao@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学青年基金(41301586);中国博士后基金(2013M540599,2014T70731);国家基础学科人才培养基金(J1103409)

TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF DROUGHT IN HUBEI PROVINCE DURING 1961-2012 BASED ON SPEI

ZHAO Lin, YU Jia-shuo, BO Yan, YANG Jiao, LI Han-qing   

  1. College of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
  • Received:2014-07-14 Revised:2014-11-21 Online:2015-07-20
  • Contact: 于家烁,E-mail:yu_js@qq.com E-mail:yu_js@qq.com

摘要: 根据湖北省及周边地区40个气象台站1960~2012年实测气象资料,基于多时间尺度的标准化降水蒸散指数(SPEI),选取干旱频率、干旱站次比和干旱强度等评估指标,研究结果表明:湖北省干旱影响范围总体较大,全域性干旱年份达54%;但干旱强度偏轻,平均干旱强度为0.65,近52 a来仅有两次重旱年,干旱强度在中旱及以下的年份占85%,且年际差异较大;省内干旱强度和站次比变化趋势基本一致,近52 a来,总体均呈不明显上升趋势,趋势率分别为0.041/10 a和3.692/10 a,20世纪80年代前后呈先下降后上升趋势;湖北省总体干旱发生频率较小,52 a平均干旱频率在16.5%~18.2%之间,空间分布特征呈现东高西低的特征;干旱发生频率呈先下降后上升的趋势,20世纪70、80年代最低;2000年以后干旱强度、站次比和频率均达到最高,并且有持续上升趋势。

关键词: 干旱, 湖北省, SPEI, 时空分布

Abstract: Drought occurs when precipitation is significantly lower than normal and it has been one of the most severe disasters all over the world. It can cause huge agricultural and economic loss when lasting for a long time. Hubei Province is located in the middle reaches of Yangtze River basin, which belongs to the temperate continental monsoon climate zone. It plays an important role in agricultural production of China. Recently, more frequent drought has occurred in Hubei Province and caused heavy losses. The basic characteristics of drought and its spatiotemporal patterns in this region need to be understood comprehensively. Quantitative analysis is useful to implement the suitable measures for drought mitigation. Based on standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) at different time scales, the meteorological data of 40 observation stations were used to analyze the characteristics of drought in this region. The objective of this study is to analyze drought in Hubei Province and describe its patterns from various aspects objectively and quantitatively, and to provide basis for moving forward and taking counter measures. The SPEI has been widely used for drought analysis and monitoring because of its robustness in multiple time scales. The role of evapotranspiration is also been included in the calculation of SPEI, which can represent water balance well from point of input and output. The evaluation indicators include drought frequency, drought stations proportion and drought intensity. The results showed that drought was widespread in Hubei Province, since 54% of years during 1961-2012 were identified as large-scale drought. However, the drought was not severe. The average intensity was 0.65. Severe drought only occurred in 2 years over the recent 52 years, while slight and moderate drought years accounted for 85%. Both of drought intensity and drought stations proportion has increased during the last 52 years (the tendency is 0.041/10 a and 3.692/10 a respectively.) Specifically, they decreased before the 1980s and then increased significantly after the 1980s. And it's obvious that 1980s was a period of transition which had lowest drought intensity and drought frequency. The similar results have been found from the viewpoints of the average drought intensity, the drought frequency and the drought area. This is consistent with previous studies in South China. Spatially, the drought frequency was higher in the east and lower in the west, ranging from 16.5% to 18.2%. From interdecadal views, the drought frequencies in the 1970s and the 1980s were the lowest (high-incidence area of drought was small in the 1970s and the 1980s), and increased after the 1980s. After the 2000s, the drought intensity, drought frequency and drought area all increased obviously and tended to continue increasing. And the spatial difference of drought frequency was also increasing. The results are in line with previous studies and records, which also indicated that SPEI was suitable for drought analysis in Hubei Province.

Key words: drought, Hubei Province, SPEI, temporal and spatial distribution

中图分类号: 

  • X826
[1] SERGIO M V S,SANTIAGO B,JUAN I L.A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: The Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index[J].J Climate, 2010,23(7):1696-1718.
[2] 刘晓云,李栋梁,王劲松.1961-2009年中国区域干旱状况的时空变化特征[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(2):473-483.
[3] HEIM R R.A review of twentieth-century drought indices used in the United States[J].Bulletin of American Meteorological Society,2002,83(8):1149-1165.
[4] 袁文平,周广胜.干旱指标的理论分析与研究展望[J].地球科学进展, 2004, 19(6):982-991.
[5] ZARGAR A,SADIQ R,NASER B, et al. A review of drought indices[J].Environmental Reviews,2011,19(NA) :333-349.
[6] WELLS N,GODDARD S,HAYES M J.A self-calibrating palmer drought severity index[J].Journal of Climate,2004,17(12):2335-2351.
[7] 李 芬,于文金, 张建新, 等.干旱灾害评估研究进展[J].地理科学进展, 2011, 30(7):891-898.
[8] 赵 林,武建军,吕爱锋,等.黄淮海平原及其附近地区干旱时空动态格局分析——基于标准化降雨指数[J].资源科学,2011,33(3):468-476.
[9] ALLEY M R.The palmer drought severity index:Limitations and assumptions[J].Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology,1984,23:1100-1109.
[10] 邹旭恺,张 强,王有民, 等.干旱指标研究进展及中美两国国家级干旱监测[J].气象, 2005, 31(7) :6-9.
[11] 王劲松,黄玉霞,冯建英,等.径流量Z指数与Palmer指数对河西干旱的监测[J].应用气象学报, 2009, 20(4):471-477.
[12] 卢洪健,莫兴国,胡 实.华北平原1960-2009 年气象干旱的时空变化特征[J].自然灾害学报,2012,21(6):72-82.
[13] 李 斌,李丽娟,李海滨,等.澜沧江流域干旱变化的时空特征[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(5):87-92.
[14] 张调风,张 勃,张 苗,等.1962-2010年甘肃省黄土高原区干旱时空动态格局[J].生态学杂志, 2012,31(8):2066-2074.
[15] 曹永强,苏 阳,张兰霞,等.基于AWTP 指数的浙江省干旱规律时空分析[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(7):1233-1240.
[16] 刘莉红,翟盘茂,郑祖光.等.中国北方夏半年干旱的时空变化[J].地理科学进展,2011,30(11):1380-1386.
[17] 齐述华,牛 铮,王军邦,等.1982-2001年间中国干旱发生时空特征的遥感分析[J].土壤学报,2006,43(3):376-382.
[18] 闫 峰,王艳姣,吴 波.近50年河北省干旱时空分布特征[J].地理研究,2010,29(3):423-430.
[19] 罗艳青,邹 滨,邱永红.华东地区干旱灾害时空演化特征研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(10):58-64.
[20] 黄晚华,隋 月,杨晓光,等.气候变化背景下中国南方地区季节性干旱特征与适应.Ⅲ.基于降水量距平百分率的南方地区季节性干旱时空特征[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(2):397-406.
[21] 郑 彬,林爱兰.广东省干旱趋势变化和空间分布特征[J].地理科学,2011,31(6):715-720.
[22] 张玉芳,王明田,刘 娟,等.基于水分盈亏指数的四川省玉米生育期干旱时空变化特征分析[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(2):236-242.
[23] 王媛媛,张 勃.基于标准化降水指数的近40 a陇东地区旱涝时空特征[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(12):2135-2144.
[24] 包云轩,孟翠丽,申双和, 等.基于CI指数的江苏省近50年干旱的时空分布规律[J].地理学报,2011,66(5):599-608.
[25] 熊光洁,张博凯,李崇银,等.基于SPEI的中国西南地区1961-2012年干旱变化特征分析[J].气候变化研究进展,2013,9(3):192-198.
[26] 许玲燕,王慧敏,段琪彩,等.基于SPEI的云南省夏玉米生长季干旱时空特征分析[J].资源科学,2013,35(5):1024-1034.
[27] 苏宏新,李广起.基于SPEI的北京低频干旱与气候指数关系[J].生态学报,2012,32(17):5467-5675.
[28] 高 瑞,王 龙,杨茂灵,等.三种干旱指数在南盘江流域识别干旱能力中的应用[J].水电能源科学,2012,30(9):9-12.
[29] HUGHES B L,SAUNDERS M A.A drought climatology for Europe[J].International Journal of Climatology, 2002, 22(13):1571-1592.
[30] 侯英雨,何延波,柳钦火,等.干旱监测指数研究[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(6):892-897.
[31] DU J,Fang J,XU W,et al.Analysis of dry/wet conditions using the standardized precipitation index and its potential usefulness for drought/flood monitoring in Hunan Province, China[J].Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, 2013, 27(2):377-387.
[32] 刘可群,陈正洪,周金莲,等.湖北省近50年旱涝灾害变化及其驱动因素分析[J].华中农业大学学报,2010,29(3):326-332.
[33] 吴凤燕,关洪林.湖北省干旱分区及各区易旱类型研究[J].中国水利,2011,(11):33-35.
[34] 刘可群,李仁东,刘志雄,等.基于CI指数的湖北干旱及其变化特征分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(10):1274-1280.
[35] 王文举,崔 鹏,刘 敏,等.近50年湖北省多时间尺度干旱演变特征[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(29):279-284.
[36] MCKEE T B, DOESKEN N J, KLEIST J.The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales[R].California:Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology, 1993.
[37] 黄晚华,杨晓光,李茂松,等.基于标准化降水指数的中国南方季节性干旱近58 a演变特征[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(7):50-59.
[38] 温克刚,姜海如.气象灾害大典:湖北卷[M].北京:气象出版社,2007.
[39] 张建云,王国庆,刘九夫.气候变化权威报告—IPCC报告[J].中国水利,2008(2):37-40.
[40] 钟海玲,沈永平.2007年全球气候变化回顾[J].气候变化研究进展,2008,4(1):53-56.
[41] 任国玉,封国林,严中伟.中国极端气候变化观测研究回顾与展望[J].气候与环境研究,2010,15(4):337-353.
[42] 李永华,徐海明,刘 德.2006年夏季西南地区东部特大干旱及其大气环流异常[J].气象学报,2009,67(1):122-132.
[1] 陈优良, 陶天慧, 丁鹏. 长江三角洲城市群空气质量时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(05): 687-697.
[2] 齐凌艳, 黄佳聪, 高俊峰, 郭玉银. 鄱阳湖枯水水位及流速时空分布模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(04): 572-584.
[3] 赵平伟, 郭萍, 李立印, 舒珺. SPEI及SPI指数在滇西南地区干旱演变中的对比分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(01): 142-149.
[4] 段辛斌, 谢意军, 郭杰, 王珂, 刘绍平, 陈大庆. 长江中游洪湖至宜昌江段鱼类空间分布特征的水声学研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1842-1849.
[5] 是怡芸, 赵月, 查燕, 张银龙. 南京市植物叶面颗粒物的黑碳含量及时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1886-1893.
[6] 刘世杰, 苏舒, 梁亮, 童小华. 基于植被状态指数的干旱化特征及气候驱动因素分析——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1927-1933.
[7] 王毅, 陆玉麒, 丁正山, 余茂军, 车冰清. 基于PDI指数的湖北省县域经济差异的方向及成因[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1663-1671.
[8] 敖荣军, 蒋亮, 张涛, 刘巧玉. 湖北省县域迁入人口的空间格局及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(11): 1672-1678.
[9] 张俊勇, 赵德招. 长江口南港北槽河床底质时空分布特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(10): 1520-1527.
[10] 江松颖, 刘颖, 万晶. 湖北省粮食生产的时空特征演变研究——基于耕地因素分解的视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1339-1346.
[11] 陈晶, 顾世祥, 何大明, 陈刚. 近60多年来滇池流域干旱特性及重现期分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1457-1465.
[12] 龚艳冰, 戴靓靓, 胡娜, 刘高峰, 张继国. 基于云推理和模糊逻辑关系模型的干旱等级预测方法研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1273-1278.
[13] 李军, 王兆礼, 黄泽勤, 钟睿达, 卓圣峰, 陈希贤. 基于SPEI的西南农业区气象干旱时空演变特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(07): 1142-1149.
[14] 郑太辉, 陈晓安, 杨洁. 近50 a江西省旱、涝变化趋势及驱动因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 664-670.
[15] 王婷, 章新平, 黎祖贤, 罗紫东, 廖梦思, 刘娜. 近52年来洞庭湖流域气象干旱的时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(03): 514-522.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 胡学玉, 孙宏发, 陈德林. 铜绿山矿冶废弃地优势植物重金属的积累与迁移[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 436 .
[3] 宋述军,周万村. 岷江流域土地利用结构对地表水水质的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 712 .
[4] 唐华秀,马劲松,战金艳,邓祥征. 江苏省人口数据空间离散化研究及其精度分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 506 .
[5] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[6] 李 新. 苏南人口密集地区城镇化过程中的环境特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 595 -599 .
[7] 王学雷,蔡述明,任宪友,陈世俭. 三峡库区湿地生态建设与保护利用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 149 -153 .
[8] 尹占娥,许世远. 上海浦东新区土地利用变化及其生态环境效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 430 .
[9] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[10] 段七零. 我国原油流动的空间格局研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 573 .