长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (9): 2096-2107.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202209020

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    

黄河流域生态保护和农业产业高质量发展评价研究

赵敏1,2,夏同水1,马宗国1*   

  1. (1.山东师范大学商学院,山东 济南 250014;2.山东管理学院工商学院,山东 济南 250357)
  • 出版日期:2022-09-20 发布日期:2022-09-29

Evaluation of Ecological Protection and High Quality Development of Agricultural Industry in the Yellow River Basin

ZHAO Min1,2,XIA Tong-shui1,MA Zong-guo1   

  1. (1. Business School, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China;2. Business School, Shandong Management University, Jinan 250357, China)
  • Online:2022-09-20 Published:2022-09-29

摘要: 农业产业的高质量发展对于推动黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展意义重大。基于“创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享”5个维度构建黄河流域农业产业高质量发展评价体系,从空间格局和时间衍变2个方面测度2010~2019年黄河流域农业产业高质量发展水平。研究发现:黄河流域农业产业高质量发展水平整体较低,存在内部不平衡性,呈现“两边高、中间低”的空间格局,但呈显著上升发展趋势;各省区均存在与地区特征相匹配的长处与短板,山东、河南、四川在创新、开放、共享发展维度起引领作用,甘肃、山西农业产业结构更加合理,青海、内蒙古、陕西、宁夏绿色发展更具有优势;各维度对整体高质量发展水平贡献不一,创新、绿色拉动作用最为明显,开放是短板。黄河流域生态保护与农业产业高质量发展应抓住政策红利,坚持生态优先,持续推进高水平对外开放,统筹推动各省区协调发展。

Abstract: The high-quality development of agricultural industry is of great significance to promote the ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin. Based on the five dimensions of "innovation, coordination, green, opening and sharing", this paper constructs the evaluation system of high-quality development of agricultural industry in the Yellow River Basin, and measures the high-quality development level of agricultural industry in the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2019 from two aspects of spatial pattern and time evolution. The results show that: the overall high-quality development level of agricultural industry in the Yellow River Basin is low, and with internal imbalance, showing a spatial pattern of "high on both sides, low in the middle", but showing a significant upward trend. All provinces and regions have strengths and weaknesses that match the regional characteristics. Shandong, Henan and Sichuan play a leading role in the dimension of innovation, opening and sharing development, the agricultural industrial structure of Gansu and Shanxi is more reasonable, while Qinghai, Inner Mongolia, Shanxi and Ningxia have more advantages in green development. The contribution of each dimension to the overall high-quality development level is different, innovation and green development play the most important role, and opening development is the short board. The ecological protection and high-quality development of agricultural industry in the Yellow River Basin should seize the policy dividend, adhere to the ecological priority, continue to promote high-level opening to the outside world, and promote the coordinated development of all provinces and regions.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[3] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[4] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[5] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[6] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[7] 赵树成, 张展羽, 夏继红, 杨洁, 盛丽婷, 唐丹, 陈晓安, . 鄱阳湖滨岸土壤磷素吸附特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .
[8] 阮甜, 查芊郁, 杨茹, 高超. 全球升温1.5℃和2.0℃对长江寸滩站以上流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 407 -415 .
[9] 邵祎婷, 何毅, 穆兴民, 高鹏, 赵广举, 孙文义, . 秦巴山区降雨侵蚀力时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 416 -425 .
[10] 牛潜, 周旭, 张继, 杨江州, 黄雪勇. 喀斯特山地城市生态系统弹性变化分析 ——以贵阳市区为例 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 722 -730 .