长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (3): 548-557.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202303010

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长三角地区碳排放差异、影响机理及碳达峰预测

邹秀清, 孙学成*, 葛天越,邢盛   

  1. (上海电力大学经济与管理学院,上海 200090)

  • 出版日期:2023-03-20 发布日期:2023-04-19

Carbon Emission Differences, Influence Mechanisms and Carbon#br#  Peak Projections in Yangtze River Delta Region#br#

ZOU Xiu-qing,SUN Xue-cheng, GE Tian-yue,XING Sheng    

  1. (College of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090,China)
  • Online:2023-03-20 Published:2023-04-19

摘要: 系统分析长三角三省一市碳排放差异、探究其影响机理及预测碳排放趋势,对促进该区域碳排放协同达峰、实现绿色一体化发展具有重要意义。根据排放系数法测算浙江、江苏、安徽和上海2005~2019年能源消费碳排放量,选择变异系数、基尼系数、泰尔指数分别测度长三角地区碳排放差异。基于STIRPAT拓展模型,采用岭回归探究长三角各省市碳排放的影响机理;运用情景分析法结合各省政策规划及发展规律,参考各变量历史变化率,设定基准发展情景预测长三角各省市2020~2035年碳排放量及碳达峰年份。结果表明:(1)考察期内长三角三省一市碳排放存在显著差异,碳排放差异整体上随着时间推移波动上升。(2)人口数量、城镇化水平、人均GDP、能源强度均显著影响长三角三省一市的碳排放,能源结构仅对江苏的碳排放有显著影响;上海、浙江、安徽的碳排放驱动因素中,产业结构影响最为显著。(3)基准情景下,上海、浙江、安徽和江苏分别在2026、2027、2028和2031年实现碳达峰,峰值依次为 20 768、40 855、63 533和 94 973 万t。

Abstract: It is of great significance to systematically analyze the differences in carbon emissions among the three provinces and one municipality in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region, explore its impact mechanism and predict the trend of carbon emissions, for promoting the coordinated peaking of carbon emissions in this region and achieving green and integrated development. In this paper, the carbon emissions of energy consumption in Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Anhui and Shanghai from 2005 to 2019 were measured according to the emission coefficient method. The variation coefficient, Gini coefficient and Theil index were selected to measure the carbon emission differences in the YRD region. Based on the STIRPAT expansion model, the ridge regression was used to explore the impact mechanism of carbon emissions in the three provinces and one municipality in the YRD region. Using the scenario analysis method, combined with the policy planning and development law of each province, and referring to the historical rate of change of each variable, a baseline development scenario is set to predict the carbon emissions and carbon peak years of the provinces and cities in the Yangtze River Delta from 2020 to 2035.The results show that: (1) During the investigation period, there were significant differences in carbon emissions among the three provinces and one municipality in the YRD region, and the disparities in carbon emissions fluctuated and increased over time as a whole. (2) Population, urbanization level, GDP per capita, and energy intensity all significantly affect the carbon emissions of the three provinces and one city in the Yangtze River Delta. The energy structure only has a significant impact on the carbon emissions of Jiangsu. In term of the driving factors of carbon emissions in Shanghai, Zhejiang, and Anhui, the industrial structure has the most significant influence on them. (3) Under the baseline scenario, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Anhui and Jiangsu will achieve carbon peaks in 2026, 2027, 2028, and 2031,with peaks of 207.68, 408.55, 635.33 and 949.73 million tons.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[2] 马小亮, 刘桂民, 吴晓东, 徐海燕, 叶琳琳, 张晓兰. 三江源高寒草甸下溪流溶解性有机碳的季节性输移特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2387 -2394 .
[3] 苏 芳, 郑亚萍, 阚立娜, 蔡 莎. 基于CVM调查法评估城市公共绿地服务价值 ——以西部省会城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2434 -2442 .
[4] 刘冀, 孙周亮, 张特, 程雄, 董晓华, 谈新. 基于不同卫星降雨产品的澴水花园流域径流模拟比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2558 -2567 .
[5] 朱立一, 何伟, 朱璧然, . 纳米二氧化硅和铅复合暴露对 斑马鱼幼鱼甲状腺内分泌系统的毒性影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2588 -2596 .
[6] 谢五三, 吴 蓉, 丁小俊. 基于FloodArea模型的城市内涝灾害风险评估与预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2848 -2855 .
[7] 刘雁慧 李阳兵. 中国水资源承载力评价及变化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[8] 刘晓阳 黄晓东 丁志伟. 长江经济带县域信息化水平的空间差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 胡兴坤, 高 雷, 杨 浩, 刘绍平, 陈大庆, 段辛斌 . 长江中游黄石江段鱼类早期资源现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 60 -67 .
[10] 胡晓, 余英俊, 魏永才, 洪亮, 张永年, 石小涛, 吴睿. 基于过鱼效果评估的涵洞鱼道堰式挡板性能研究与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 134 -143 .