长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (9): 1932-1948.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202309014

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于InVEST模型的钱江源国家公园生态系统服务评估及权衡协同关系研究

冉璇1,李渊1*,郭宇龙2,位贺杰2   

  1. (1.浙江工商大学旅游与城乡规划学院,浙江 杭州 310018;2.河南农业大学资源与环境学院,河南 郑州 450002)
  • 出版日期:2023-09-20 发布日期:2023-09-22

Ecosystem Services Assessment and Trade-off Synergy Relationships in Qianjiangyuan National Park based on InVEST model

RAN Xuan1, LI Yuan1, GUO Yu-long2, WEI He-jie2   

  1. (1.School of Tourism and Urban Planning, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018,China; 2.School of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002,China)
  • Online:2023-09-20 Published:2023-09-22

摘要: 探究近30年钱江源国家公园生态系统服务演变规律,衡量生态系统服务之间的权衡协同关系,为钱江源国家公园的生态资产管理和生态环境保护提供理论依据。基于InVEST模型对1990~2020年钱江源国家公园的水资源供给、土壤保持、固碳释氧、生境质量等4种生态系统服务展开评估,并探究其时空演变规律,利用权衡协同度模型(ESTD)分析各生态系统服务间的权衡协同关系。结果表明:(1)研究区的生态系统服务总量呈上升趋势,其中水资源供给服务由1990年的2.39×107m3下降至2000年的1.92×107m3,再到2020年上升至3.74×107m3,土壤保持、固碳释氧与生境质量服务的物质量持续上升;(2)从空间格局来看,水资源供给服务的空间格局变化明显,其余生态系统服务的时空演变格局较稳定。园内生态系统服务的Ⅳ类热点区面积由1990年的7.78 km2增加至2020年的12.75 km2;(3)研究区生态系统服务间的关系以协同为主,协同关系主要出现于土壤保持、固碳释氧、生境质量三者之间,权衡关系则存在于水资源供给与其他三种服务之间;(4)土地利用类型的转变、特定生态系统服务相关条件的改变、相关政策与专项规划的实施、人类活动的干扰是影响钱江源国家公园生态系统服务空间格局及权衡协同关系的主要因素。近30年钱江源国家公园生态系统服务的时空演变格局及权衡协同关系变化显著,主导的影响因素为土地覆盖变化,当前园区整体生态系统服务呈西部高、东部低的空间格局,未来应重点关注园区的功能分区优化,逐步探索与完善国家公园管理体系,着力平衡生态资源保护与人类社会经济发展之间的关系。

Abstract: National parks have extremely high natural elements and ecological values. As the only national park in the Yangtze River Delta, the study of ecosystem services in Qianjiangyuan National Park is beneficial to the management of ecological assets and sustainable development of the region. Therefore, this paper explored the evolution of ecosystem services and measured the trade-off synergistic relationship among ecosystem services in Qianjiangyuan National Park over the past 30 years.Based on the InVEST model, four eco-services, including water supply, soil conservation, carbon sequestration and oxygen release, and habitat quality, were evaluated from 1990 to 2020, and the temporal and spatial evolution law was explored. The ecosystem services trade-off synergy model (ESTD) was used to analyze the trade-off synergy between ecosystem services. (1) The total quality of ecosystem services in Qianjiangyuan National Park showed an increasing trend, among which water supply services decreased from 2.39×107m3 to 1.92×107m3, and the quality of soil conservation, carbon sequestration and oxygen release and habitat quality services continued to rise. (2) From the spatial pattern perspective, the spatial pattern of the water resource supply service obviously changed, while the other ecosystem services were relatively stable. The area of class Ⅳ hotspots of ecosystem services increased from 7.78 km2 to 12.75 km2. (3) The relationship between ecosystem services was mainly synergy, and the synergistic relationship was mainly among soil conservation, carbon sequestration and oxygen release, and habitat quality. The trade-off relationship existed between the water resource supply service and the other three services. (4) The changes in land use type, the changes in conditions related to specific ecosystem services, the implementation of relevant policies and special plans, and the interference of human activities are the main factors affecting the spatial pattern and trade-off/synergistic relationship of ecosystem services in Qianjiangyuan National Park. The spatial and temporal evolution pattern of ecosystem services and the trade-off synergistic relationship of Qianjiangyuan National Park changed significantly over the past 30 years, and the dominant influencing factor is the land cover change. The current spatial pattern of the ecosystem services in the park was higher in the west and lower in the east in 2020. Thus, in the future, efforts should be focused on optimizing the functional zoning of the park, gradually exploring and improving the national park management system, and balancing the relationship between ecological resource protection and human socio-economic development.


No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李向富, 刘目兴, 易军, 吴四平, 杨叶, 娄淑兰, . 峡山地不同垂直带土壤层的水文功能及其影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1809 .
[2] 安俞静, 刘静玉, 李 宁, 乔墩墩, 刘梦丽. 中原城市群铁路网络可达性及经济联系格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1947 -1957 .
[3] 李雪松 龙湘雪 齐晓旭. 长江经济带城市经济-社会-环境耦合协调发展的动态演化与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[4] 何松蔚, 王成刚, 姜海梅, 曹乐, 王新伟. 2015年冬季苏州城市热岛特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2078 .
[5] 韦胜 徐建刚 马海涛. 长三角高铁网络结构特征及形成机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 陈万旭 李江风 冉端. 长江中游城市群土地利用转型和城镇化之间空间关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 赵 毅, 徐绪堪, 李晓娟. 基于变权灰色云模型的江苏省水环境系统脆弱性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2463 -2471 .
[8] 任娟, 王建力, 杨平恒, 詹兆君, . 亚高山旅游景区岩溶地下水水化学动态变化及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2548 -2557 .
[9] 刘莲, 刘红兵, 汪涛, 朱波, 姜世伟. 三峡库区消落带农用坡地磷素径流流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2609 -2618 .
[10] 孙殿臣, 王慧敏, 黄 晶, 刘高峰, . 鄱阳湖流域城市洪涝灾害风险及土地类型调整策略研究 ——以景德镇市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2856 -2866 .