长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (11): 2403-2417.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202311015

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带农业碳排放EKC检验及其驱动因素分析

田云,蔡艳蓉*   

  1. (中南财经政法大学工商管理学院,湖北 武汉 430073)
  • 出版日期:2023-11-20 发布日期:2023-11-28

EKC-based Test for Agricultural Carbon Emissions in Yangtze River Economic Belt and Analysis of Driving Factors

TIAN Yun,CAI Yan-rong   

  1. (Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
  • Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-11-28

摘要: 以长江经济带为研究对象,在明确各省市2005~2020年农业碳排放量现状特征的基础上探讨了其与农村居民人均纯收入的关系,同时分析了农业碳排放的驱动因素并对各省市2023~2030年农业碳排放情况进行了合理预测。研究发现:(1)长江经济带各省市农业碳排放量均具有明显增减变化。样本考察期内,5省处于增长态势且以云南增幅最大,6省市处于下降态势且以上海降幅最大;农业碳排放量总体呈“中部高,东西低”特征。(2)EKC检验结果表明,长江经济带各省市均存在EKC关系但整体趋势并非完全一致,基于EKC曲线差异可将11个省市划分为倒“N”型、倒“U”型和正“U”型等3种类型。(3)STIRPAT测算结果表明,第一产业从业人员数和农林牧渔总产值对农业碳排放量起促进作用且为主导因素,而农业技术水平则表现为抑制作用但作用力度较小。(4)GM(1,1)预测结果表明,2023~2030年长江经济带各省市农业碳排放量均呈现出明显的起伏变化且减排成效不一,基于预测结果可将11个省市划分为“持续下降型”“持续增长型”和“先升后降型”等3种类型。

Abstract: Taking the Yangtze River Economic Belt as the research object, this paper discussed the relationship between agricultural carbon emissions and per capita net income of rural residents based on the characteristics of the current situation of agricultural carbon emissions in each province from 2005 to 2020. The driving factors of agricultural carbon emissions were also analyzed, and the agricultural carbon emissions of each province from 2023 to 2030 were projected. The results showed that:(1)The agricultural carbon emissions showed significant changes in either growth or decline. During the sampling period, 5 provinces were in the trend of growth, of which Yunnan province was the largest. Six provinces were in the trend of decline, of which Shanghai was the largest. Agricultural carbon emissions were generally "high in the middle and low in the east and west".(2)The EKC test results showed that the EKC relationship existed in all provinces of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, however the overall trend was not completely consistent. Based on the difference of EKC curves, 11 provinces could be divided into three types: inverted "N" type, inverted "U" type and positive "U" type.(3)The results of STIRPAT showed that the number of people employed in the primary industry and the gross output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery dominated agricultural carbon emissions, while the level of agricultural technology had a suppressive and less powerful effect.(4)The GM (1,1) projections showed that the agricultural carbon emissions showed obvious fluctuations.The effectiveness in reducing emissions from 2023 to 2030 varied from province to province. Based on the forecast results, the 11 provinces could be divided into three types: "continuously declining", "continuously growing" and "rising then falling".

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 卢德彬 毛婉柳 杨东阳 赵佳楠. 基于多源遥感数据的中国PM2.5变化趋势与影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[2] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 何松蔚, 王成刚, 姜海梅, 曹乐, 王新伟. 2015年冬季苏州城市热岛特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2078 .
[4] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[5] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .
[6] 刘莲, 刘红兵, 汪涛, 朱波, 姜世伟. 三峡库区消落带农用坡地磷素径流流失特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2609 -2618 .
[7] 孙殿臣, 王慧敏, 黄 晶, 刘高峰, . 鄱阳湖流域城市洪涝灾害风险及土地类型调整策略研究 ——以景德镇市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2856 -2866 .
[8] 胡思 曾祎 王磊 贺新光. 长江流域极端降水的区域频率及时空特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 畅华仪, 张俊飚, 何可, . 技术感知对农户生物农药采用行为的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 202 -211 .
[10] 荣欣 易桂花 张廷斌 李景吉 别小娟 覃艺 夏杰. 2000-2015年川西高原植被EVI海拔梯度变化及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .