长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (1): 87-101.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202401008

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

规划管制下土地发展机会差别对农村家庭收入的影响 ——以武汉市蔡甸区为例

田霞,蔡银莺*   

  1. (华中农业大学公共管理学院,武汉 430070)
  • 出版日期:2024-01-20 发布日期:2024-02-01

Impacts of Land Development Opportunities Under Planning Regulation on Rural Household Income: A Case Study of Caidian District, Wuhan

TIAN Xia, CAI Yin-ying   

  1. (College of Public Administration,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,China)
  • Online:2024-01-20 Published:2024-02-01

摘要:  城镇开发与生态保护等规划管制引致土地发展机会的不平等会影响农村家庭收入,这是客观存在的事实,然缺乏量化研究。测度分解出规划管制下土地发展机会差别对微观家庭收入带来的影响,可为构建国土空间规划配套政策破解规划衍生的区域发展不平衡提供参考依据。选取武汉市蔡甸区的中法生态新城与消泗乡作为城镇开发和湿地保护的典型区,2021年随机抽样调查了573户农村家庭,运用倾向得分匹配、中介效应等方法揭示土地发展机会差别对农村家庭收入的影响。研究表明:(1)城镇开发区土地的非农发展机会对农村家庭总收入、本地务工收入和转移性收入均有显著正向影响,ATT估计值分别为0.112、1.014和0.254,城镇开发经济产业集聚增加村民就业机会,对人力资本质低但量多农村家庭的工资性收入提升有显著的正向效应;(2)劳动力配置在土地非农开发机会影响农村家庭工资性收入的过程中发挥着中介效应,家庭务工人数占比的中介效应为0.116,且在1%水平上显著;(3)相较于湿地保护区,城镇开发区农村家庭的内部收入差距相对较小,主要原因是土地开发带动低收入家庭的工资性收入增长,且对农耕收入的负向影响低于高收入家庭。建议构建土地开发利得向生态保护及农业耕作区转移的共建共享机制,以实现规划管制区与非管制区之间土地增值的分享。

Abstract: It’s an objective fact that imbalanced land development opportunities induced by planning regulation, such as urban development and ecological protection, undoubtedly differentiate rural household income. However, there is a lack of quantitative measurement. Measuring and decomposing the impacts of land development opportunities on rural household income can support policies of territorial spatial planning to rectify the imbalanced regional development that may be caused by planning. The Sino-French Ecological New Town and Xiaosi Township in Caidian District of Wuhan City are typical areas for urban development and wetland protection, where we surveyed 573 rural households by random sampling in 2021. The impacts of land development opportunities on rural household income were examined by propensity score matching and mediation effect model. The results showed that, firstly, the non-agricultural development opportunities of land in urban development zones had a significantly positive impact on the total income, local wage income, and transfer income of rural household. The estimated ATT values were 0.112, 1.014, and 0.254, respectively. Urban development and its economic agglomeration increased the household non-farm employment. The promotion effect of land development opportunities on farmers’ wage income was more significant for high-quantity, and low-quality households. Secondly, the allocation of household labor force intermediated the effect of land non-agricultural development opportunities on household income. The mediating effect of the proportion of household workers was 0.116, which was significant at the 1% level. Thirdly, compared to the wetland reserve, the income gaps in the urban development zones were smaller. The main reason was that the land development opportunities promoted the wage income growth of low-income household, and the negative impact on farming income was lower than that of high-income household. It was suggested to establish a co-construction and sharing mechanism for transferring added land value of land development to ecological protection and agricultural farming areas, so as to realize the sharing of land value increments between restricted and unrestricted development zones.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[2] 孙惠惠, 章新平, 罗紫东, 尚程鹏, 贺新光, 饶志国.  近53 a来长江流域极端降水指数特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1879 .
[3] 杨佳, 葛馨, 吴起鑫. 贵阳市主城区空气质量指数时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1827 .
[4] 方琳, 吴凤平, 王新华, 余燕团.  

基于共同前沿SBM模型的农业用水效率测度及改善潜力 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2293 -2304 .

[5] 代培, 阎明军, 周游, 周彦锋, 熊满晖, 卢剑达, 刘凯.  

太湖五里湖沿岸带浮游植物群落生态特征(2014~2015) [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2348 -2357 .

[6] 吕乐婷, 王晓蕊, 孙才志, 张 杰. 基于SWAT模型的细河流域蓝水绿水资源量时空分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 39 -47 .
[7] 李艳, 马百胜, 杨宣. 两类ENSO事件对中国东部地区极端降水的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 469 -482 .
[8] 刘 菊, 傅 斌, 张成虎, 胡治鹏, 王玉宽. 基于InVEST模型的岷江上游生态系统水源涵养量与价值评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 577 -585 .
[9] 柯杭, 王小军, 尹义星, 罗志文, . 衡水市1961~2015年极端降水和干旱的时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 971 -980 .
[10] 钟业喜, 郭卫东, 毛炜圣, 王晓静, 冯兴华. 闽新轴带城市铁路网络及可达性演变研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1015 -1024 .