长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (11): 2410-2424.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202411008

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

城镇化进程中耕地利用脆弱性演变与优化调控——以淮海经济区为例

李怡1, 方斌2,3,4*,张志成2,3,4
  

  1. (1.山西师范大学地理科学学院,山西 太原 030000;2. 南京师范大学地理科学学院,江苏 南京 210023;3. 南京师范大学新型城镇化与土地问题研究中心,江苏 南京 210023;4. 江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,江苏 南京 210023)
  • 出版日期:2024-11-20 发布日期:2024-11-27

Evolution and Optimization of Cropland Use Vulnerability in Urbanization Process:A Case of the Huaihai Economic Zone

LI Yi1, FANG Bin2,3,4, ZHANG Zhi-cheng2,3,4   

  1. (1.School of Geography Science, Shanxi Normal University, Taiyuan 030000, China; 2.School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; 3. Research Center of New Urbanization and Land Problem,Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; 4. Jiangsu Provincial Geographic Information Resources Development and Utilization Cooperative Innovation Center, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Online:2024-11-20 Published:2024-11-27

摘要: 明晰耕地利用系统发生的脆弱性状态,是应对系统危机发生的有效途径。以淮海经济区为例,从暴露度、敏感性和适应能力3方面建构了一套适用于城镇化扰动下的耕地利用脆弱性评价体系,揭示了县域尺度2000~2018年的耕地利用脆弱性时空演变规律,进一步划分了耕地利用脆弱性类型区域,并提出了有针对性的调控策略。结果表明:(1)耕地利用脆弱性总体呈现持续增长趋势,主要由于耕地利用系统内部适应能力对于耕地利用暴露度承载力不足。(2)耕地利用暴露度由低值类分布主导转向高值类分布主导;敏感性和适应能力一直由低值类分布占主导,但大部分县区两者有所增长;综合而言,脆弱性呈现低值类分布主导与高值类分布蔓延的并存趋势。(3)依据研究末期的耕地利用脆弱性结构要素特征,将淮海经济区划分为了7种耕地利用脆弱性类型区域,并因地制宜提出差异性策略建议,以缓解城镇化建设与耕地保护矛盾,促进耕地利用系统健康可持续发展。

Abstract: Clarifying the vulnerability status of cropland use system is an effective way to respond to systemic crises. Taking the Huaihai Economic Zone as an example, this article constructed a set of assessment system of cropland use vulnerability under urbanization disturbance from three aspects: exposure, sensitivity, and adaptability. This study revealed the spatio-temporal evolution of cropland use vulnerability at the county level from 2000 to 2018. The regional types were divided according to the characteristics of cropland use vulnerability, and targeted regulation strategies were proposed. The findings showed that: (1) The overall vulnerability of cropland use had shown a gradual growth trend, mainly due to the insufficient carrying capacity of the internal adaptability of cropland use for the cropland use exposure. (2) The spatial distribution of cropland use exposure had shifted from being dominated by low-value counties to being dominated by high-value counties; the spatial distribution of sensitivity and adaptability of cropland use had been dominated by low-value counties, while both had increased in most counties; Collectively, the spatial distribution of cropland use vulnerability showed the dominance of low-value counties and the spread of high-value counties. (3) Based on the structural characteristics of cropland use vulnerability, the Huaihai Economic Zone was classified into seven types of regions, and corresponding targeted strategies were proposed to alleviate the contradiction between urbanization and cropland protection and to promote the healthy and sustainable development of cropland use system.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!