长江流域资源与环境 >> 2024, Vol. 33 >> Issue (11): 2499-2512.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202411015

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

高标准农田建设政策对粮食可持续生产能力的影响

李琳,韩继良,朱玉春*   

  1. (西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西 杨凌 712100)
  • 出版日期:2024-11-20 发布日期:2024-11-27

Impact of Well-facilitated Capital Farmland Construction Policy on the Sustainable Food Production Capacity

LI Lin, HAN Ji-liang, ZHU Yu-chun   

  1. (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)
  • Online:2024-11-20 Published:2024-11-27

摘要: 高标准农田建设,是巩固和提高粮食可持续生产、保障国家粮食安全的关键举措。基于2001~2019年31省份的面板数据,以高标准农田建设政策的“准自然实验”为抓手,通过构建连续双重差分及多重差分模型,识别土地赋能、设施赋技、资本赋利对粮食可持续生产能力的单项效应及耦合效应,探究影响机制和异质性。结果表明:(1)土地赋能、设施赋技、资金赋利显著提高粮食可持续生产能力,在考虑可能的内生性、剔除政策干扰因素后结果依然显著;(2)土地赋能、设施赋技、资金赋利的耦合效果显著优于单项效果,可提高158.5%的粮食可持续生产能力;(3)土地赋能、设施赋技、资金赋利对粮食可持续生产能力的影响存在高标准农田建设程度差异和地理位置差异;(4)土地赋能、设施赋技通过提高资源配置效率,促进粮食可持续生产能力,但资金赋利未通过显著性检验。据此,应推动和完善高标准农田建设机制,焕发高标准农田活力,保障粮食可持续生产。

Abstract: Well-facilitated capital farmland construction is a key measure to consolidate and improve the sustainable food production capacity and to ensure national food security. Based on panel data from 31 provinces from 2001 to 2019, this paper used the "quasi-natural experiment" to conduct impacts of well-facilitated capital farmland construction policies. By constructing continuous double and multiple difference models, this paper identified the single and coupling effects of land empowerment, facility empowerment, and capital empowerment on sustainable food production capacity and explored the impact mechanism and heterogeneity. The results showed that (1) land empowerment, facility empowerment, and capital empowerment significantly improved the sustainable production capacity of food, and the results were still significant after considering possible endogeneity and excluding policy interference factors; (2) The coupling effect of land empowerment, facility empowerment, and capital empowerment was significantly better than the single effect, which was found to potentially increase the sustainable food production capacity by 158.5%; (3) The impact of land empowerment, facility empowerment, and capital empowerment on the sustainable production capacity of grain varied in terms of high standard farmland construction level and geographical location; (4) Land empowerment and facility empowerment enhanced the efficiency of resource allocation and promoted sustainable food production capacity, however,  financial empowerment failed to pass the significance tests. The government should promote and improve the mechanism for constructing well-facilitated capital farmland, revitalize well-facilitated capital farmland, and ensure sustainable food production.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!