长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (09): 1972-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202509007

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

省级都市圈土地利用碳排放及影响因素分析——以江苏为例

杨小艳1,林莹2,3,陈龙高2,3*,刘晶2,3,吴海倩2,3,王欣瑶2,3   

  1. (1. 江苏师范大学地理测绘与城乡规划学院,江苏 徐州 221116;2. 中国矿业大学公共管理学院,
    江苏 徐州 221116;3. 中国矿业大学中国资源型城市转型发展与乡村振兴研究中心,江苏 徐州 221116)
  • 出版日期:2025-09-20 发布日期:2025-09-22

Carbon Emissions and Influencing Factors in Provincial Urban Agglomerations: A Case Study of Jiangsu

YANG Xiao-yan1, LIN Ying2,3,CHEN Long-gao2,3,LIU Jing2,3,WU Hai-qian2,3,WANG Xin-yao2,3   

  1. (1. School of Geography, Geomatics and Planning,Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China;
    2. School of Public Policy & Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;
    3. Research Center for Transition Development and Rural Revitalization of Resource-based Cities in China,
    China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)
  • Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-09-22

摘要: 都市圈是土地利用碳排放的主要来源地区。综合采用碳排放系数法、几何重心分析方法以及多元回归分析等方法,研究了江苏省级都市圈土地利用碳排放及其影响因素的时空分异特征。结果表明:(1)30年间,全省土地利用碳排放总量从3 502.41增长至32 875万t,空间分布上呈自北向南典型的梯度递增规律,且徐州都市圈增长速度高于南京与苏锡常都市圈;地均碳排放整体呈上升趋势,其最低与最高值分别从-3.99与214.7 t/hm2增长至-2.74与262.43 t/hm2;(2)南京与苏锡常都市圈地均碳排放显著高于徐州都市圈,但徐州都市圈增长速度更快;30年间全省土地利用变化碳排放总量重心整体呈北移趋势;(3)地形地势、植被及生态水体等自然因素均对土地利用碳排放总量和强度产生不同程度或方向的影响;(4)经济社会因素中,人口总量是推动碳排放总量增加的最重要因素,但在不同都市圈以及不同发展阶段并不相同;人口聚集虽然增加了碳排放规模,但使得地均碳排放强度有所降低;非农业生产中的土地要素投入、三产结构以及人类活动强度的提高均会在不同程度上推动碳排放的增加,且城市化以及经济社会发展的影响愈来愈重要;高铁站对于经济活动的拉动效应并未能充分显现。本方法适用于基于行政单元的驱动力影响时空分异研究,成果可为空间差异化的省级土地利用碳减排策略制定提供支撑,以此助力“双碳”战略目标的实现。

Abstract: Urban agglomerations are the main sources of carbon emissions. This paper utilized methods including carbon emission coefficient analysis, geometric centroid analysis, and multiple regression analysis to explore the spatiotemporal characteristics of land use carbon emissions in provincial urban agglomerations and their natural and socio-economic impact factors in Jiangsu Province. The results showed that: (1) Over 30 years, the total carbon emissions from land uses of the three agglomerations increased from 35.024 1 million tons to 328.75 million tons, spatially showing a clear gradient increasing distribution pattern from north to south. The total carbon emissions in Xuzhou urban agglomeration had grown faster than those in Nanjing and Su-Xi-Chang; The carbon emissions per unit area showed an overall upward trend, with the minimum and maximum values increasing from -3.99 and 214.7 t/hm2 to -2.74 and 262.43 t/hm2, respectively. (2) the carbon emissions per unit area in Nanjing and Su-Xi-Chang were significantly higher than those in Xuzhou urban agglomeration, but the growth rate in Xuzhou was faster; In the period of 30 years, the centroid of the total carbon emissions from land use changes had generally moved northward; (3) Factors such as topography and vegetation and ecological water bodies would have different degrees or directions of impact on the total and intensity of carbon emissions; (4) Among socio-economic factors, the total population was the most important factor driving the increase in total carbon emissions, but the impact was not the same in different urban agglomerations and at different stages of development; Population aggregation increased the scale of carbon emissions, but reduced the intensity of carbon emissions per unit area; The input of land elements in non-agricultural production, the structure of tertiary industry, and the increase in human activity intensity all promoted the increase in carbon emissions, and urbanization and socio-economic development were becoming increasingly important; The pulling effect of high-speed rail stations on economic activities was not been fully manifested. The proposed methodology was particularly suitable for the spatiotemporal differentiation of driving forces based on administrative units. This work provided support for the formulation of carbon reduction strategies for spatially differentiated provincial land uses, and thereby was helpful in achieving the "dual carbon" strategic goals.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!