长江流域资源与环境 >> 2025, Vol. 34 >> Issue (09): 2054-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202509013

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于可变区间的汉江流域褒河和湑水河生态基流计算#br#

魏娜1,魏俊华1,卢锟明1,2,刘洪超3,张琳琳3   

  1. (1. 西安理工大学旱区水工程生态环境全国重点实验室,陕西 西安 710048; 2. 中国电建集团西北勘测设计研究院有限公司,陕西 西安710065; 3. 陕西黄河古贤水利枢纽开发有限公司,陕西 西安 710032)
  • 出版日期:2025-09-20 发布日期:2025-09-22

Calculation of Ecological Base Flow for Baohe River and Xushui River in Hanjiang River Basin Based on Variable Interval

WEI Na1, WEI Jun-hua1, LU Kun-ming1,2, LIU Hong-chao3, ZHANG Lin-lin3   

  1. (1. State Key Laboratory of Water Engineering Ecology and Environment in Arid Area, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China;2. Power China Northwest Engineering Corporation Limited, Xi’an 710065, China;3. Shaanxi Huanghe Guxian Water Conservancy Development Corporation Limited, Xi’an 710032, China)
  • Online:2025-09-20 Published:2025-09-22

摘要: 为解决传统生态基流计算不合理、在实际应用中难以适应需求、可操作性不强的问题,以汉江一级支流褒河和湑水河主要控制断面为例,运用Mann-Kendall(MK)检验寻找径流序列突变点划分子序列;采用14种水文学法计算子序列生态基流,对子序列加权平均确定综合生态基流;通过结果筛选得到生态基流可变区间;并对生态基流中长期、短期保证程度进行分析。研究结果表明:(1)考虑水文序列变异下的生态基流可变区间能够更好地适应复杂多变的环境与需求,更具合理性和可操作性。(2)河东店断面生态基流区间上、下限范围分别为3.02~34.64、0.78~13.71 m3/s,升仙村断面生态基流区间上、下限范围分别为2.21~31.28、0.57~12.51 m3/s。(3)河东店断面生态基流保证程度整体高于升仙村断面;两断面生态基流区间下限保证程度整体高于上限,中长期保证程度整体高于短期,枯水年保证程度明显低于丰、平水年。研究结果为褒河和湑水河的水资源合理开发利用和生态文明建设提供科学依据。

Abstract: To address the issues of unreasonable calculation of traditional ecological base flow, and the difficulty in adapting to practical application demands, this paper took the main control sections of the Baohe River and Xushui River, the primary tributaries of the Hanjiang River, as an example. The Mann-Kendall (MK) test was used to detect mutation points in the runoff sequence, and divided the sequence into subsequences. The ecological base flow of each subsequence was calculated using 14 hydrological methods. The comprehensive ecological base flow was obtained by taking the weighted average of these subsequence ecological base flows. By screening the results, the variable interval of ecological base flow was obtained. Finally, the mid-long term and short term guarantee degrees of ecological base flow were analyzed. The results showed that: (1) The variable interval of ecological base flow could better be adapted to complex and changing environments, which was more reasonable and feasible to implement. (2) For the Hedongdian section, the upper and lower limits of the ecological base flow were 3.02 to 34.64 m3/s and 0.78 to 13.71 m3/s, respectively. For the Shengxiancun section, the upper and lower limits of the ecological base flow were 2.21 to 31.28 m3/s and 0.57 to 12.51 m3/s, respectively. (3) The guarantee degrees for the Hedongdian section were higher than those for the Shengxiancun section. The guarantee degrees for the lower limits of the ecological base flow exceeded those for the upper limits. The mid-long term guarantee degrees of the ecological base flow were higher than those for the short term. The guarantee degrees in dry years were significantly lower than those in wet and normal years. These results provided a scientific basis for the rational development and utilization of water resources, as well as for the construction of ecological civilization of the Baohe River and Xushui River.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!