长江流域资源与环境 >> 2009, Vol. 18 >> Issue (3): 270-274.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

宋至清荆江南岸分流四口的演变

陈曦   

  1. 武汉大学历史学院| 湖北 武汉 430072
  • 出版日期:2009-03-20

BIFURCATION OF THE FOUR OPENINGS ON THE SOUTHERN BANK OF JINGJIANG RIVER:FROM SONG TO QING DYNASTY

  1. College of History| Wuhan University| Wuhan 430072| China
  • Online:2009-03-20

摘要:

在历史时期荆江地区的经济开发与江湖关系的演变历程中,分流诸口是极其重要的影响因素。以宋至清的志书为主要资料,立足于历史学的实证方法,以今荆江南岸存在的4个分流穴口,即虎渡口、调弦口、藕池口和松滋口为主要对象,考察四口在宋元明清时期的分塞情况,并对今人存在的一些认识进行了辨析。其中,虎渡河的形成时间说法不一,南宋以后,虎渡口逐渐形成稳定分流。调弦口自元代大德年间开浚后时开时塞,直至清朝才基本保持分流,1958年调关设置后此口渐废。藕池口早在五代时即已存在,北宋以后湮塞,直至1852年藕池堤溃不筑,藕池河再次形成。松滋河则在1869年以前由于黄家埠堤溃决而形成。研究表明,宋代以降,四口的分塞情况较为复杂,因此,考察荆江穴口分流与湮塞的历史变迁,厘清以往的相关歧见,将有助于更正确、客观地理解今天的人地关系、江湖关系的格局及其走向。

关键词: null

Abstract:

The bifurcation of openings had always played a key role during the historical evolution of the Jingjiang area' economic development and JingjiangDongtinghu' relationship.Based on the related chorography and historical empirical methods,this paper examines the evolved bifurcation processes of Hudukou,Tiaoxiankou,Ouchikou and Songzikou,which are still on the southern bank of Jingjiang River from Song to Qing Dynasty.This paper also clarifies some ambiguous views on the four openings.There has been various views on the time when Hudu distributary started breaching.In Late Song Dynasty,Hudu distributary was breached stably from Jingjiang.Tiaoxiankou was opened at Yuan Dynasty,and since then it was periodically opened and silted.Tiaoxian distributary was breached during Qing Dynasty untill Tiaoxian Gate was built in 1958.Ouchi distributary was breached from Jingjiang in Five Dynasties,and it had been silted up since Northen Song.Ouchi distributary was breached from Jingjiang again in 1852 when the Ouchi Bank collapsed.Songzi distributary had been breached from Jingjiang because of the collapse of Huangjiabu Bank before 1869.The results indicate that there had been a complicated evolution of bifurcation of the four openings.Therefore,it is necessary to examine the bifurcation of the openings on both bank of Jingjiang and clarify the ambiguous views.It will help us get a better understanding of the relationship between man and land,between Jingjiang River and Dongtinghu Lake,their trends as well.

Key words: the Southern Bank of Jingjiang River, four openings, evolution, from Song to Qing Dynasty

[1] 郭艳娜 冯新斌 闫海鱼 钱晓莉 孟 博 姚 珩. 乌江流域梯级水库入出库河流中总汞和甲基汞的时空分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 356-.
[2] 刘丛强 汪福顺 王雨春 王宝利. 河流筑坝拦截的水环境响应——来自地球化学的视角[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 384-.
[3] 赵沁娜 徐启新. 城市土地置换过程中土壤多环芳烃污染的健康风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 286-290.
[4] 杨, 琳, 黄介生, 李大文, 黄志强. 控制排水条件下土壤氮素的运移[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1063-.
[5] 杨永峰, 彭镇华, 孙启祥, 周金星. 重大工程对血吸虫病流行区扩散的潜在影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1067-.
[6] 王肇磊, 贺新枝. 晚清时期湖北自然灾害的治理及其经验教训[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1080-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 许峰, 祁士华, 高媛, 邢新丽. 绵阳市代表性点位土壤多环芳烃剖面分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 192 .
[2] 陈校辉,边文冀,赵 钦,严维辉,彭 刚. 长江江苏段鱼类种类组成和优势种研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 571 .
[3] 邵晓梅,王 静. 小城镇耕地集约利用评价方法比较研究 ——以浙江省慈溪市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 93 .
[4] 魏 婷, 吴长年. 一种工业园区生态系统健康评价方法及其应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 680 .
[5] 陆应诚,王心源,高 超. 基于遥感技术的圩田时空特征分析——以皖东南及其相邻地域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 61 -65 .
[6] 陶豫萍,吴 宁,罗 鹏,刘 兵. 森林对污染物(SO2-4)的过滤器效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 628 -632 .
[7] 胡明秀, 胡 辉, 王立兵. 武汉市工业“三废”污染状况计量模型研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 470 -474 .
[8] 刘 凯, 徐东坡, 张敏莹, 段金荣, 施炜纲. 崇明北滩鱼类群落生物多样性初探[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 418 -421 .
[9] 李阳兵,姜 丽,白晓永. 亚热带喀斯特石漠化土地退化特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 195 -399 .
[10] 吴宜进. 近50年长江流域降水日数的演变趋势[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 217 .