长江流域资源与环境 >> 2010, Vol. 19 >> Issue (06): 634-.

• 鄱阳湖、洞庭湖湿地生态 • 上一篇    下一篇

洞庭湖退田还湖区不同土地利用方式对土壤养分库的影响

王月容1| 周金星2| 周志翔1*| 孙启祥2   

  1. (1.华中农业大学园艺林学学院| 湖北 武汉 430070; 2.中国林业科学研究院林业研究所| 北京 100091)
  • 出版日期:2010-06-20

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LAND USE PATTERNS UNDER CONVERTING POLDERS BACK INTO WETLANDS ON SOIL NUTRIENT POOLS IN THE DONGTING LAKE REGION

WANG Yuerong1, ZHOU Jinxing2, ZHOU Zhixiang1, SUN Qixiang2   

  1. (1.College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences,Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China; 2.Research Institute of Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China)
  • Online:2010-06-20

摘要:

以钱粮湖垸为例,研究了洞庭湖退田还湖区的林地(Ⅰ)、园地(Ⅱ)、旱地(Ⅲ)、水田(Ⅳ)和荒地(Ⅴ)等不同土地利用方式下的土壤养分含量、养分库综合指数以及养分相关性。研究表明:土壤养分分布的表聚效应明显,0~50 cm土层土壤有机质含量为3.40~32.32 g/kg,全氮、水解氮含量为2.23~9.71 g/kg、12.95~112.00 mg/kg,全磷、速效磷含量为29.50~69.35 g/kg、4.15~75.68 mg/kg,全钾、速效钾含量为603~3069 g/kg、37.70~217.50 mg/kg;林地土壤全氮含量最高,有机质含量最低,水田有机质、全钾及速效磷含量均最高,旱地水解氮含量最高,而荒地土壤全氮、全磷、全钾、水解氮及水解磷均最低;土壤养分库综合指数变化范围为24.33~295.93,排序为IⅣ(231.96)>IⅢ(193.46)>IⅡ(70.90)>IⅠ(59.57)>IⅤ(35.59);土壤养分要素的相关性分析结果表明,有机质与全磷、全磷与速效磷、全氮与全钾、水解氮与速效磷均呈显著正相关关系,相关系数分别为 0.5760、0.5961、0.6864 和 0.5701。

Abstract:

Based upon the case of Qianlianghu polder in the Dongting lake region,soil nutrient contents,synthetical indexes of nutrient pool and relative coefficients among soil nutrient indexes were studied for five typical land use patterns under converting polders back into wetlands, which include forestland (Ⅰ),garden land (Ⅱ),dry land (Ⅲ),paddy land (Ⅳ) and waste land (Ⅴ).The results showed that there was an obvious regularity that soil nutrient contents were higher in 0~25 cm soil layers than in 25~50 cm soil layer.In different patterns and 0~50 cm soil layers,the contents of organic matter (OM),total nitrogen (TN),available nitrogen (AN),total phosphorus (TP),available phosphorus (AP),total potassium (TK) and available potassium (AK) were 340~3232 g/kg,223~971 g/kg,1295~11200 mg/kg,2950~6935 g/kg,415~7568 mg/kg,603~3069 g/kg and 3770~21750 mg/kg respectively.The highest contents of TN and the lowest OM occurred in pattern Ⅰ,the highest contents of OM,TK and AP were in pattern Ⅳ,and the highest AN were pattern Ⅲ.However,the contents of TN,TP,TK,AN and AP were the lowest in pattern Ⅴ.Soil nutrient pool synthetical indexes ranged from 2433 to 29593 in five land use patterns,which showed by regularities of 〖WTBX〗IⅣ(23196)>IⅢ(19346)>IⅡ(7090)>IⅠ(5957)>IⅤ〖WTBZ〗(3559).Through Pearson coefficient analyzing,it was showed that there existed highly positive relation between OM and TP,TP and AP,TN and TK,AN and AP which relative coefficients were 0.5760,0.5961,0.6864 and 0.5701 respectively.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 罗专溪,张 远,郑丙辉,富 国,陆兆华. 三峡水库蓄水初期水生态环境特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 781 -784 .
[2] 陈 诚,陈 雯 . 盐城市沿海的适宜开发空间选择研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 667 .
[3] 李晓文,方精云,朴世龙. 上海城市土地利用形成、变化及其空间作用机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 34 -40 .
[4] 李加林,许继琴,童亿勤,杨晓平,张殿发. 杭州湾南岸滨海平原土地利用/覆被空间格局变化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 709 -713 .
[5] 李玉辉,李忠德,张丹丹,李兆林 ,周顺吉. 石林风景名胜区对乡村经济发展的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 18 -23 .
[6] 黄真理. 国内外大型水电工程生态环境监测与保护[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(2): 101 -108 .
[7] 杨志荣,吴次芳, 靳相木, 姚秋萍. 基于DEA模型的城市用地经济效益比较研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 14 .
[8] 吴虹月,包维楷,王 安. 外来种入侵对乡土生物多样性的影响机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 40 -46 .
[9] 徐新良, 庄大方, 贾绍凤, 胡云峰. GIS环境下基于DEM的中国流域自动提取方法[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(4): 343 -348 .
[10] 徐宪立,张科利,刘 雯,孔亚平, 陈济丁. 青藏公路路堤边坡水土保持措施及效益分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 619 .