长江流域资源与环境 >> 2010, Vol. 19 >> Issue (11): 1294-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江河口九段沙上沙湿地芦苇与土壤之间营养元素的灰色关联分析

杨永兴,刘长娥,杨杨,李珂   

  1. (1.同济大学环境科学与工程学院污染控制与资源化国家重点实验室|长江水环境教育部重点实验室|上海 200092; 2.上海农业科学院生态环境保护研究所|上海 201106;3.同济大学生命科学与技术学院|上海 200092 )
  • 出版日期:2010-11-20

GRAY CORRELATION ANALYSIS ON NUTRIENT ELEMENTS BETWEEN PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS PLANT AND SOIL IN THE UPPER SHOAL OF JIUDUANSHA WETLAND, THE YANGTZE RIVER ESTUARY
 

YANG Yongxing1| LIU Change1,2, YANG Yang3 |LI Ke1   

  1. (1. Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092,China;2 .Institute of Ecological Environment Protection|Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Science, Shanghai 201106, China|3. School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
  • Online:2010-11-20

摘要:

为探明生长季不同时期芦苇湿地生态系统植物与土壤之间营养元素的关系,利用灰色关联分析方法,对长江河口九段沙上沙芦苇湿地的芦苇营养元素吸收量与土壤营养元素含量之间的关联度进行了研究。结果表明:芦苇主要从0~15 cm土壤吸取N元素,从15~40 cm土壤获取P、K元素,而从40~60 cm土壤吸收N、P、K元素量都较少。芦苇-土壤之间营养元素关联度排序为:4月为N>K>P;5月为P>K>N,6~8月为K>P>N;9~11月为N>K>P;12月为P>N>K。同一营养元素不同时期芦苇-土壤之间关联度也存在差异,芦苇与土壤营养元素N、P、K元素关联最密切时期分别出现在9、12与6月,均与上层土壤营养元素关联最密切。9、12与6月分别为芦苇-土壤之间N、P、K元素迁移、转化与循环的活跃时期,上层土壤是其活动相对重要的场所。芦苇生长过程中吸收土壤营养元素均存在时空差异,不同时期芦苇对不同深度土壤的营养元素吸收强度也不尽相同。芦苇地下部分不同部位与土壤中营养元素种类的关联度排序相同,而芦苇地上部分的排序则不同。

Abstract:

Gray correlation analysis method was applied to analyze the relation of nutrient elements between 〖WTBX〗Phragmites australis and soil at the Phragmites australis wetland in the upper shoal of Jiuduansha wetland,the Yangtze river estuary in order to understand the relations between the absorbing content of the nutrient elements in plant growth progress and the content of nutrient elements of soil in the wetland ecosystem in different periods of the growing season.The results indicated that the absorption of nutrient elements by Phragmites australis showed timespatial distribution characteristics in the process of plant growth.Phragmites australis mainly absorbed N in the depth of 0~15cm,P and K in the depth of 15~40 cm in soil profile,while it absorbed less in depth of 40~60 cm in the soil profile.Association degree of nutrient elements between plant and soil was in the order of N> K> P in April; P> K> N in May, K> P> N in June to August; N> K> P in September to November; P> N> K in December respectively. The association degree of same nutrient element between the plant and soil also was not same in the different growth period of the plant. The closest relationship of the nutrient elements N, P, K between plant and soil occurred in September, December and June separately, and the closest relationship of the nutrient element between the plant and soil appeared in the upper layer of soil. The active period for migration, transformation and cycling of nutrient elements K, N, P occurred in June, September and December respectively, and the upper layer of soil was an important place for nutrient element activity. There was obvious difference in time and space for the growth of Phragmites australis to use nutrient elements K, N, P in the soil, and there was also difference for Phragmites australis to absorb nutrient elements K, N, P in different depth of soil in different growing periods of the plant. The orders of association degree of nutrient elements between different modular of underground part of Phragmites australis and soil were same, but those of association degree of nutrient elements between different modular of aboveground part of Phragmites australis and soil were different.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶豫萍,吴 宁,罗 鹏,刘 兵. 森林对污染物(SO2-4)的过滤器效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 628 -632 .
[2] 吴丰林,周德民,胡金明. 基于景观格局演变的城市湿地景观生态规划途径[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 368 .
[3] 张林, 王礼茂, 王睿博,. 长江中上游防护林体系森林植被碳贮量及固碳潜力估算[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 111 .
[4] 凌成星, 张怀清, 林 辉. 利用混合水体指数模型(CIWI)提取滨海湿地水体的信息[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 152 .
[5] 胡振鹏, 葛, 刚, 刘成林, 陈伏生, 李, 述. 鄱阳湖湿地植物生态系统结构及湖水位对其影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 597 .
[6] 林鹏程|高欣|刘春池|刘焕章. 葛洲坝上下游江段鱼类时空分布特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(09): 1047 .
[7] 肖建红 |陈东景 |徐 敏 |于庆东. 围填海工程的生态环境价值损失评估——以江苏省两个典型工程为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(10): 1248 .
[8] 凡非得| 王克林 | 宣 勇 | 岳跃民. 西南喀斯特区域生态环境敏感性评价及其空间分布[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(11): 1394 .
[9] 乔伟峰|孙在宏|邵繁荣, 倪婷|冯松松|张果. 高度城市化区域土地利用结构演化与驱动因素分析——以苏州市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(05): 557 .
[10] 傅 春| 詹莉群| 卢艺分. 基于TFP的中部地区经济增长中自然资源贡献分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(11): 1301 .