长江流域资源与环境 >> 2010, Vol. 19 >> Issue (12): 1478-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

泥石流堆积扇发育演化特征观测研究

张金山,沈兴菊,魏军林   

  1. (1.中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室|四川 成都 610041;2.中国科学院/水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所|四川 成都 610041;3.西南民族大学旅游与历史文化学院|四川 成都 610041;4.中国科学院研究生院|北京 100049;5.四川省金科成地理信息技术有限公司|四川 成都 610042)〖
  • 出版日期:2010-12-20

OBSERVATIONAL STUDY ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OFDEVELOPMENT AND EVOLVEMENT OF DEBRIS FLOW DEPOSIT FAN

ZHANG Jinshan1,2,4 |SHEN Xingju3 |WEI Junlin5   

  1. (1.Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazard and Surface Processes,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Chengdu 610041,China;2.Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences&|Ministry of Water Conservancy,Chengdu 610041,China;3.College of Tourism and History &|Culture,Southwest University for Nationalities,Chengdu 610041,China;4.Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;5.Sichuan JKC Geographical Information Technologies Co,Ltd,Chengdu 610042,China)〖
  • Online:2010-12-20

摘要:

李子凹沟和滑脚坡沟是著名高频泥石流沟蒋家沟中游流通段的两条支沟,流域条件极为相似,泥石流暴发频率高,堆积扇发育快。以这两条沟为对象,观察泥石流在堆积扇上的运动和停积过程,对不同特征的泥石流堆积体进行采样分析,并在每年雨季前后测量堆积扇地形及其纵横断面。对这两条支沟泥石流堆积扇2006~2008年的发育过程、平面形态、纵横剖面、堆积速度等进行分析,得出如下结论:(1)滑脚坡沟泥石流体颗粒较粗,容重大,泥石流整体堆积,呈垄岗状。李子凹沟泥石流粗大颗粒少,容重小,在扇体上漫流,堆积呈舌状。堆积扇的进一步发育主要靠垄岗状堆积改道完成。(2)主沟堆积条件下,支沟泥石流堆积扇以淤高为主,且淤高幅度在扇体上下部分布均匀。(3)泥石流堆积扇发展到一定程度后,纵比降基本稳定,表现为剖面上发生持续且较为均衡的堆积。横剖面在主沟上游方向的坡度较小。〖

Abstract:

The Liziwa Ditch and Huajiaopo Ditch are 2 tributary ditches in middle reaches of the Jiangjia Ditch,a famous ditch having debris flow of high frequency.These two ditches are extremely similar in conditions of drainage area,with high frequency of outbreaks of debris flow and rapid development of deposit fan.These two ditches were studied in this paper,process of movement,ceasing and accumulation of debris flow on deposit fan were observed,deposit body of debris flow with different features were sampled and analyzed,and terrain of deposit fan was measured before and after rainy season annually as well as its vertical and lateral section.By analysis of development process,planar shape,longitudinal and transverse section,accumulation rate of deposit fan in the 2 tributary ditches during 2006~2008,the following conclusions were obtained.Huajiaopo Ditch was larger in volume weight and grain size,and its accumulation was holistic and Lung Kongshaped.Whereas Liziwa Ditch was smaller in volume weight and grain size,and debris flow overflowed on deposit fan and its accumulation was linguiform.Further development of deposit fan was completed by Lung Kongshaped accumulationcourse changing.On accumulation condition of the main channel,deposit fan in tributary ditch had mainly accretion,and extent of accretion was uniformly distributed at top and bottom of the fan.When debris flow fan developed to a certain extent,its vertical gradient was stable and smaller cross slope showed at the upstream direction of the trunk channel.〖

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 杜昌文,周健民,王火焰. 聚合物包膜肥料研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 725 -730 .
[3] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[4] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[5] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[6] 黄 峰 魏 浪 李 磊 朱 伟. 乌江干流中上游水电梯级开发水温累积效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 337 .
[7] 胡鸿兴, 张岩岩, 何伟, 田蓉, 钟鑫, 韩世松, 李思思, 王俊杰陈文方, 杨阳, 陈侈, 邓晗, 文英, 崔雅婷, 李茜,  王璇, 彭菁菁, 高鑫, 唐义. 神农架大九湖泥炭藓沼泽湿地对镉(Ⅱ)、铜(Ⅱ)、铅(Ⅱ)、锌(Ⅱ)的净化模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1050 .
[8] 蔡海生, 肖复明, 张学玲. 基于生态足迹变化的鄱阳湖自然保护区生态补偿定量分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 623 .
[9] 王月容, 周金星, 周志翔, 孙启祥. 洞庭湖退田还湖区不同土地利用方式对土壤养分库的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 634 .
[10] 段金荣, 张红燕, 刘凯, 徐东坡, 张敏莹, 施炜纲. 湖泊的宜渔性评价研究——以蠡湖为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(06): 666 .