长江流域资源与环境 >> 2011, Vol. 20 >> Issue (05): 546-.

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

赣江一级支流浮游植物群落动态特征分析——以袁河为例

张柱,刘足根,张萌,陈宏文,弓晓峰,邓道贵   

  1. (1. 南昌大学环境与化学工程学院|江西 南昌 330031;2. 江西省环境保护科学研究院|江西 南昌 330029;3. 淮北师范大学生命科学学院|安徽 淮北 235000)
  • 出版日期:2011-05-20

STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITY IN ATRIBUTARY OF GANJIANG RIVER——A CASE STUDY IN YUANHE RIVER

ZHANG Zhu1| LIU Zugen2| ZHANG Meng2| CHEN Hongwen2| GONG Xiaofeng1| DENG Daogui3   

  1. (1. School of Environment and Chemical Engineering,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031,China|2. Jiangxi Provincial Institute ofEnvironmental Protection Sciences,Nanchang 330029,China; 3. School of Life Science,Huaibei Normal University,Huaibei 235000,China)
  • Online:2011-05-20

摘要:

2009年6、11月和2010年4月共3个水情期(即丰、枯和平水期)对赣江下游一级支流袁河的浮游植物群落结构特征开展河流生态学调查分析。调查共发现浮游植物109种,隶属于6门61属。其中绿藻门物种种类数最多,共27属54种,其次为硅藻门,共15属30种,第三是蓝藻门11属12种。此外,裸藻门3属6种,甲藻门3属4种,隐藻门2属3种。调查样点的浮游植物丰度均处于1.12×105~129.20×105 ind./L,丰水期和枯水期浮游植物以蓝藻为优势类群,平水期则硅藻占绝对优势。丰水期浮游植物优势属为脆杆藻属和席藻属,枯水期为栅藻属,针杆属,蓝隐藻属和小环藻属,到了平水期小环藻属占绝对优势。3个水情期中优势种钝脆杆藻和小席藻(丰水期);尖尾蓝隐藻和双头针杆藻(枯水期);梅尼小环藻(平水期)等均为污水指示种。通过生物多样性指数分析发现藻类Shannon-Wiener指数、Simpson指数、Pielou均匀度指数和Margalef丰富度指数的变化范围分别为:1.14~2.92、0.45~0.93、0.36~0.92和0.42~2.78。通过指示生物群落法和生物多样性指数法对袁河进行水质评价发现两种评价结果基本一致,袁河处于α-β-中污染状态,不同采样点间污染程度差异性较大。

Abstract:

In the present study, phytoplankton abundance and community structure were investigated and analyzed in June and November 2009 and April 2010 (e.g.highwater period,lowwater period and normalwater period,respectively) in Yuanhe River,a tributary of the lower reaches of Ganjiang River.The results showed that 109 species of phytoplankton were identified,belonging to 61 genera of 6 phyla,among which there were 54 species of 27 genera in Chlorophyta,30 species of 15 genera in Bacillariophyta,12 species of 11 genera in Cyanophyta,6 species of 6 genera in Euglenophyta,4 species of 3 genera in Pyrrophyta and 3 species of 2 genera in Cryptophyta.The phytoplankton abundance ranged from 112×105 to 12920×105 ind./ L.Cyanophyta was the dominant phylum in highwater period and lowwater period,while Bacillariophyta dominated in normalwater period.The constructive species of phytoplankton were the saprobic indicators and they were 〖WTBX〗Fragilaria capucina〖WTBZ〗 and 〖WTBX〗Phormidium tenue〖WTBZ〗 in highwater period,〖WTBX〗Chroomonas caudate〖WTBZ〗 and 〖WTBX〗Synedra amphicephala〖WTBZ〗 in lowwater period and Cyclotella meneghiniana in normalwater period,respectively.Through the analysis of biodiversity index,the ShannonWiener diversity index,Simpson diversity index,Pielou evenness index and Margalef abundance index of phytoplankton were 114~292,045~093,036~092 and 042~278,respectively.Furthermore,using the methods of modified bioindicator community and biodiversity index to biologically assess the water pollution,we found that both methods came to the general same results,It indicated that Yuanhe River was in αβmoderate pollution,and that there was a big difference in pollution levels among different sampling sites

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 杨 选. 国内外典型水治理模式及对武汉水治理的借鉴[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(5): 584 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 李恒鹏,杨桂山,刘晓玫,万荣荣. 流域土地利用变化的长周期水文效应及管理策略[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 450 -455 .
[5] 廖顺宝,李泽辉. 四川省人口分布与土地利用的关系及人口数据空间化试验[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 557 -561 .
[6] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[7] 董林水, 张旭东, 周金星, 李冬雪. 青藏铁路沿线北段植被物种丰富度及盖度的动态变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 551 .
[8] 胡贤辉,张 霞,杨钢桥. 湖北省土地利用结构变化及其驱动机制分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 43 .
[9] 张 征,李 今,梁 威,吴振斌. 拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂对水生态系统的毒性作用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 125 -130 .
[10] 张代钧,许丹宇,任宏洋,曹海彬,郑 敏,刘惠强. 长江三峡水库水污染控制若干问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 605 -610 .