长江流域资源与环境 >> 2011, Vol. 20 >> Issue (09): 1040-.

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄盖湖水系河源区——皤河大型无脊椎动物群落与水质评价

蒋小明|程建丽|熊晶|张鹗|谢志才   

  1. (1.中国科学院水生生物研究所|湖北 武汉 430072;2. 中国科学院研究生院| 北京 100039;3. 井冈山大学生命科学学院|江西 吉安 343009;4. 湖北省环境监测中心站|湖北 武汉 430072)
  • 出版日期:2011-09-20

MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND BIOASSESSMENT OF WATER QUALITY IN POHE STREAM, ONE OF THE HEADWATER STREAMS OF HUANGGAI LAKE WATERNETWORK

JIANG Xiaoming1,2, CHENG Jianli3,XIONG Jing1,4, ZHANG E1,XIE Zhicai1   

  1. (1. Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Science,Wuhan 430072, China|2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100039, China|3. School of Life Science, Jinggangshan University, Ji'an 343009, China|4. Hubei Environmental Monitoring Center, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Online:2011-09-20

摘要:

2009年7月对黄盖湖水系河源区——皤河的大型无脊椎动物进行调查。共采集到无脊椎动物54种,隶属于4门6纲36科。其中水生昆虫45种,软体动物4种,甲壳动物2种,寡毛类、涡虫纲、蛛形纲各1种。无脊椎动物密度方面的优势类群主要为蜉蝣目稚虫和摇蚊幼虫。宽基蜉(Choroterpes sp.)、微动蜉(Cinygmula sp.)、四节蜉(Baetis sp.)和无突摇蚊 (Ablabesmyia sp.)是最优势的种类,其相对丰度分别占总丰度的4040%、838%、426%和419%。典范对应分析(CCA)显示,海拔和河宽是影响无脊椎动物群落分布的关键环境因子。采用ShannonWiener指数和BI生物指数对各样点的水质状况进行了评价:二者结果具有一定差异,BI指数的评价结果更符合实际情况

Abstract:

During July of 2009, macroinvertebrate assemblages were investigated in Pohe Stream which is an important headwater system belonging to Huanggai Lake waternetwork,located in Chibi County,Hubei Province.A total of 54 taxa were identified,belonging to 4 phyla,6 classes and 36 families.Of which 45 were aquatic insects,4 mollusks,2 crustaceans and 3 others (oligochaete,turbellarian and arachnidan).The larvae of Ephemeroptera and Chironomidae were the dominant groups in abundance.〖WTBX〗Choroterpes〖WTBZ〗 sp.,〖WTBX〗Cinygmula〖WTBZ〗 sp.,〖WTBX〗Baetis〖WTBZ〗 sp.and 〖WTBX〗Ablabesmyia〖WTBZ〗 sp.were most dominant taxa and their relative abundance were 4040%,838%,426% and 419% of the total,respectively.Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was used to explore the importance of environmental factors in influencing macroinvertebrate community structure. The results showed altitude and channel width were the significant predictors of the community variance.ShannonWiener diversity and Hilsenhoff's Biotic Index (BI) were explored to assess the water quality of the stream. The results of two indices were different to a certain extent and indicated that the water quality was quite clean in most sampling sections. Considering the coincidence with physical-chemical parameters,BI bioassessment method should be applicable in this headwater stream ecosystem

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程 江,何 青,王元叶,刘 红,夏小明. 长江河口细颗粒泥沙絮凝体粒径的谱分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 460 -464 .
[2] 彭 建,景 娟,吴健生,蒋依依,张 源. 乡村产业结构评价——以云南省永胜县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(4): 413 .
[3] 蔡述明. 研究长江中游地区水资源开发利用的新成果[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 100 .
[4] 段学花 王兆印 余国安. 以底栖动物为指示物种对长江流域水生态进行评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3): 241 -247 .
[5] 王宏巍. 俄罗斯土壤污染防治立法研究及其对构建我国《土壤污染防治法》的启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(4): 326 .
[6] 刘蓓蓓, 李凤英, 俞钦钦, 于洋, 毕军. 长江三角洲城市间环境公平性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(12): 1093 .
[7] 吴建楠, 姚士谋, 曹有挥, 王成新. 长江三角洲城市群城乡统筹发展的空间差别化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(z1): 21 .
[8] 师长兴. 长江上游输沙模数分布图的制作及其空间分异特征初步分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(11): 1322 .
[9] 伍学进, 曾菊新. 试论宜居性城市绿地的规划与建设[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(1): 28 .
[10] 施晓晖|徐祥德. 三峡库区来水流量与长江流域上游前期降水的关系研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2011, 20(09): 1062 .