长江流域资源与环境 >> 2011, Vol. 20 >> Issue (12): 1514-.

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

近岸海域沉积物重金属生态风险评价模型对比研究

李庆召| 曾朝辉| 李春光   

  1. (1.郑州航空工业管理学院,河南 郑州 450015;2.北京自然博物馆,北京 100050)
  • 出版日期:2011-12-20

A COMPARISON STUDY OF ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT MODEL ON HEAVY METALS OF OFFSHORE SEDIMENTS

LI Qingzhao1| ZENG Zhaohui2, LI Chunguang1   

  1. (1.Zhengzhou Institute of Aeronautical Industry Management,Zhengzhou 450015,China;2.Beijing Museum of Natural History,Beijing 100050,China)
  • Online:2011-12-20

摘要:

重金属污染被认为是2l世纪影响人类生存与健康的重要环境问题,该类物质极易在近岸海域沉积环境富集,因此海洋沉积物重金属污染已成为人们关注的全球性的环境问题之一,而重金属生态风险评价则成为污染生态学研究的前沿。综述了重金属的形态及生物有效性、重金属污染程度评价方法、重金属生态效应评价法等3种典型生态风险评价方法,结合国内外研究现状对不同的生态风险评价的方法和技术手段进行对比研究,并讨论了相关模型的适用范围及局限性。主要结论如下:金属的赋存形态是基于操作定义的,采用不同的提取方法及提取过程中使用的不同试剂都会对分析结果产生影响;重金属污染程度评价方法难以反映沉积物中重金属的化学活性和生物可利用性;生态效应评价方法从重金属的生物毒性角度出发,反映了多种污染物的综合影响,但该评价方法没有考虑环境条件对元素地球化学分布的影响。因此,在进行近岸海域沉积环境重金属生态风险评价时,采用多种方法相结合的综合评价是解决实际问题的有效途径。

Abstract:

Heavy metal contamination in offshore is a worldwide problem,because these metals are generally indestructible and most of them can cause heavy damages to coastal ecological environments and systems.Those pollutions are mainly transported into coast and adjacent sea by input and/or industrial wastewaters discharge.Most Heavy metals,especial for particleactive components,are deposition in coastal sedimentary environment. Sediments are the main repository and source of heavy metals in the aquatic environment and play an important role in the transport and storage of potentially hazardous metals. The paper reviewed the ecological risk assessment methods on heavy metals in coastal sediments,including how the chemical forms or type of the binding of metals act on bioavailability,pollution degree evaluation by contamination index,and ecological effect assessment of heavy metals based on ecological risk index.The advantages and disadvantages of those methods were also compared and discussed.Assessing sediment pollution by using the heavy metal chemical form might not firmly guarantee the occurrence of deleterious ecological effects.Contamination index could hardly give comprehensive and systematic information about bioavailability of heavy metals.The ecological risk index have been derived with a variety of both theoretical methods that rely upon equilibrium partitioning models and empirical methods that rely upon analyses of matching,fieldcollected chemistry,and biological effects data.But evaluation on the potential ecological risk of heavy metals based on ecological risk index might lose information about environmental effects on heavy metals.To sum up,the evaluation together with the different methods should be a useful crosscheck for us in the assessing process.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李崇明,黄真理. 三峡水库入库污染负荷研究(Ⅱ)——蓄水后污染负荷预测[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 97 -106 .
[2] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[3] 李 佳,李思悦,谭 香,张全发. 南水北调中线工程总干渠沿线经过河流水质评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 693 .
[4] 邹丽敏, 王 超, 冯士龙. 玄武湖沉积物中重金属污染的潜在生物毒性风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 280 .
[5] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[6] 陈 爽,王 进,. 太湖流域城市化水平及外来人口影响测评[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(6): 524 -529 .
[7] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[8] 张文广,胡远满, 刘 淼,杨兆平,常 禹,李秀珍,杨 孟,问青春, . 基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值损益估算——以岷江上游地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 821 .
[9] 李贵祥,孟广涛,方向京,郭立群,柴 勇,和丽萍,张正海. 云南金沙江流域主要森林植被类型分布格局[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 51 .
[10] 冯新灵,罗隆诚,邱丽丽,. 成都未来气候变化趋势的R/S分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 83 .