长江流域资源与环境 >> 2011, Vol. 20 >> Issue (3): 305-.

• 环境监测 • 上一篇    下一篇

三峡工程蓄水运用期库区干流水质分析

印士勇,娄保锋,刘辉,兰静,袁琳,张琦,臧小平   

  1. (1.长江流域水环境监测中心|湖北 武汉 430010;2.长江流域水资源保护局|湖北 武汉430010)
  • 出版日期:2011-03-20

ANALYSIS OF WATER QUALITY OF THE YANGTZE RIVER WITHIN THE THREE GORGES RESERVOIR AREA DURING CONSTRUCTION PERIOD 

YIN Shiyong, LOU Baofeng1, |LIU Hui1, |LAN Jing1, YUAN Lin1, |ZHANG Qi1, |ZANG Xiaoping2   

  1. (1.Yangtze Valley Water Environmental Monitoring Center,Wuhan 430010,China;2.Yangtze Valley Water Resources Protection Bureau,Wuhan 430010,China
  • Online:2011-03-20

摘要:

分析了三峡库区蓄水前后(1998~2009年)干流水质的变化及原因。结果表明,同蓄水前相比,蓄水后库区干流水质变好,库区干流断面月度达标率均值由蓄水前的623%变为蓄水后的783%,库区干流超标污染物主要为高锰酸盐指数、总磷、铅等。蓄水后水质时空分布出现新的特点,近坝水体悬浮物、浑样高锰酸盐指数、总磷、铅等可吸附污染物浓度显著降低。蓄水后年内悬浮物及浑样高锰酸盐指数、总磷和铅浓度仍然是丰水期>平、枯水期,但近坝水体不同水期间浓度差别比蓄水前明显减小。蓄水后,库区干流浑样高锰酸盐指数、总磷、铅浓度整体上表现为从库尾至库首沿程下降,尤以丰水期沿程下降最为突出。浑样高锰酸盐指数、总磷、铅浓度以上变化特征主要缘于库区水位抬高后,流速减小导致的澄清作用,即高锰酸盐指数所代表污染物、磷、铅等随泥沙发生了不同程度的沉降。蓄水前后清样高锰酸盐指数和总磷未发生明显变化,156 m蓄水后至今,清样铅浓度明显低于蓄水前。

Abstract:

Water quality in the Yangtze River within the Three Gorges Reservoir area before and after the impoundment was analyzed.In general,water quality after the impoundment was better than that before the impoundment.Average percentage of water quality(according to monthly evaluation results)met or better than III standard increased from 623% before the impoundment to 783% after the impoundment.The main parameters not meeting the standards were total phosphorus(TP),permanganate index(CODMn)and plumbum(Pb),etc.New characteristics in spatial and temporal distribution of water quality have been found.The concentrations of CODMn,TP,Pb of water column near the dam decreased significantly compared with that of preimpoundment,especially for water area near the dam site.Concentrations of CODMn,TP,Pb were still wet season>even,dry season.It is also showed that concentrations of the above parameters decreased along the direction from tail to head of the reservoir,especially in the wet season.Above changes of water quality features were mainly due to sedimentation of sands in the reservoir resulting from the increase of water level and the decrease of velocity,which meaned that part of pollutants settled with deposition of suspended solids and entered into sediment

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 禹 娜,陈立侨,赵泉鸿. 太湖介形类动物丰度与生物量[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 546 .
[2] 李继清,张玉山,王丽萍,纪昌明. 洪灾综合风险的结构特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 805 -809 .
[3] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .
[4] 柳晶辉,杨 坤,张 力. 丹江口库区土地利用/覆被与景观格局变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 456 .
[5] 周 翠, 王丽平, 章明奎. 平原地区复合土地利用系统中氮磷流失敏感区界定[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 761 .
[6] 刘德富,黄钰铃,| 王从锋,. 水工学的发展趋势——从传统水工学到生态水工学[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 92 -96 .
[7] 周廷刚,张其良. 长江上游水土流失成因及治理模式研究——以重庆市城口县为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 89 -93 .
[8] 倪敏莉, 张佳华, 申双和. 南京市不同时间尺度温度变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 169 .
[9] 黄, 薇, 陈 进, 王 波. 梯级开发对河流径流过程和水温过程均化作用的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 335 .
[10] 罗秉征. 河口及近海的生态特点与渔业资源[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 1992, 1(1): 4 .