长江流域资源与环境 >> 2013, Vol. 22 >> Issue (08): 979-.

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于GIS和分形理论的城市蔓延度研究——以马鞍山市为例

郭贝贝 ||於忠祥 |杨绪红 |金晓斌 |周寅康   

  1. (1南京大学地理与海洋科学学院|江苏 南京 210093;2安徽农业大学经济管理学院|安徽 合肥 230036)
  • 出版日期:2013-08-20

URBAN SPRAWL RESEARCH BASED ON GIS AND FRACTAL THEORY:
A CASE STUDY OF MAANSHAN CITY| CHINA

GUO Beibei1, YU Zhongxiang2, YANG Xuhong| JIN Xiaobin1, Zhou Yinkang1   

  1. (1 School of Geographic and Oceanographic Science,Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
    2 School of Economics and Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)
  • Online:2013-08-20

摘要:

在快速城市化过程中,城市不断扩张而产生的蔓延现象与土地可持续发展紧密相关,合理控制城市蔓延度可以节约资源,促进城市内涵式发展。根据蔓延度内部机理和分形理论构建蔓延测度指标体系,采用GIS方法,通过分维数、空间稳定性等指数,以马鞍山市为例分析研究区城市蔓延度特征和时空差异。研究表明:(1)分形理论适用于城市蔓延度的定量研究;(2)从时间维度看,研究区内部不同区域间的蔓延趋势总体相似,但蔓延程度有所差异;(3)从空间维度看,蔓延度与分维数、建设用地破碎度呈正相关,与空间稳定性指数呈负相关。马鞍山市城市蔓延的机制是土地导向,经济发展是抑制过度蔓延的动力

Abstract:

 Urban sprawl is a form in the process of rapid urbanization in recent China. The urban expansion has led to urban sprawl. The sprawl phenomenon is closely related to sustainable land development; it affects the social, economic and environmental development. If urban sprawl is controlled reasonably, it can conserve resources and promote the city connotation development. The internal mechanism of sprawl and fractal theory was used to construct sprawl measurement indicator system, GIS means was applied to calculate the index, and spatial and temporal difference was analyzed through the fractal dimension and spatial stability index. This paper took the urban expansion of Maanshan City during 2005-2010 as a study case, and indicated that urban sprawl could be measured through growth configuration, urban growth efficiency and its impacts of urban growth. This study described the urban growth configuration based on fractal theory, and established an urban sprawl evaluation system with AHP on the basis of western experiences and approaches from sprawl mechanism and the traditional perspective of spatial pattern for measuring sprawl in Maanshan City, covering eight factors of irregular of land patches, patch fragmentation, clustering, concentration, elasticity index, economy, commuter and urban life quality, a total of 12 indices in all. Specifically, patch fractal dimension(D), patch shape index(LS), stability index(SK), fragmentation of builtup land (FC), leapfrog index(LF), compactness(C), the rate of change of the central area population density(PD), consumption of builtup land for construction per new population(PC),twentythree production inputoutput coefficient(IO), builtup land and economic growth coefficient(CE), crowding level(CL)and residential density(RD) were developed for measuring the degree of urban sprawl. ArcGIS 9.3 was selected to analyze landuse data in order to calculate by weight sum of these 12 indices. The results show as follows. (1) The fractal theory was applied to study the quantitative research of sprawl degree. (2) During the study period, the sprawl degree of three districts in the study area was different, but the overall sprawl trend was similar. (3) The sprawl degree, fractal dimension and builtup land fragmentation were being related. It was negatively correlated with spatial stability index. Based on the result, we discussed the regional spatial differences of urban sprawl and some proposals were put forward from many aspects. The study area was further divided into 86 smaller regions, which selected street or village as a unit to calculate builtup land stability coefficient, fragmentation, the compact degree and the shape index of urban space. The builtup land fractal dimension was closer to 1.5. It indicated that the overall stability of the plaque was low, and the expansion ring in the study area was from the city center to the periphery; if it was closer to the city center area, the builtup land fragmentation was smaller, and the concentration of compact was higher;[JP2] if it was away from the city center area, the builtup[JP] land fragmentation was larger, and the concentration of compact was lower. The SK, FC, CI and LS in the spatial distribution were similar to urban sprawl morphological characteristics. The mechanism of urban sprawl in Maanshan City was landoriented. Economic development was one drive to suppress the urban sprawl.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨 琳,何 芳,陈天明. 基于弹性理念的城市用地开发战略研究——以上海市宝山区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 360 .
[2] 仲阳康,周 慧,施文彧,周 晓,周立晨,王天厚. 上海滩涂春季鸻形目鸟类群落及围垦后生境选择[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 378 -383 .
[3] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .
[4] 徐 慧|范颖骅|吕多智|崔岑. 基于网格划分的宜兴市区滨水区可达性评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(11): 1336 .
[5] 段德忠| 刘承良. 随机故障、蓄意攻击与城乡路网空间稳定性——以武汉城市圈为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(8): 1123 .
[6] 闫东升, 杨槿, 陈雯. 失地农民生活满意度测度及影响因素研究——以南京市仙林新村为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1450 .
[7] 陈桃, 包安明, 何大明. 基于MODIS NDVI的攀枝花市植被覆盖变化及其驱动力#br#[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1847 .
[8] 吴殿鸣, 邵大伟. 基于最佳尺度的城市扩张特征研究——以苏州中心城区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1937 -1946 .
[9] 周惠, 赵微, 汪飞腾. 农地整理后期管护制度绩效研究:影响路径及中介效应分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2629 -2639 .
[10] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .