长江流域资源与环境 >> 2014, Vol. 23 >> Issue (09): 1236-.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201409008

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

川西南山区聚落宜居性的空间差异分析

于慧,刘邵权,王勇,刘卫东,郑志军   

  1. (1.中国科学院/水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川 成都 610041;2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3.四川省国土勘测规划研究院,四川 成都 610041;4.四川省农业科学院遥感应用研究所, 四川 成都 610041; 5.成都市地质环境监测站,四川 成都 610041
  • 出版日期:2014-09-20

ANALYSIS OF THE SPATIAL DISPARITIES OF MOUNTAIN SETTLEMENT LIVABILITY IN SOUTHWEST SICHUAN

YU Hui1,2, LIU Shaoquan1, WANG Yong3, LIU Weidong4, ZHENG Zhijun5   

  1. (1.Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China;2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3.Sichuan Institute of Land Planning and Survey, Chengdu 610041, China; 4.Remote Sensing Application Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China; 5.Geological Envorinment Monitoring Station of Chengdu, Chengdu 610041, China)〖WT
  • Online:2014-09-20

摘要:

结合山区实际情况,建立山区聚落宜居性评价指标体系。利用山区聚落宜居性评价模型对川西南山区26个区县进行系统评价,计算出川西南山区聚落宜居性指数。在此基础上通过ESDA分析和相关性分析,研究川西南山区聚落宜居性的空间差异,结果表明:(1)川西南山区聚落宜居性存在正的相关性,表现出很强的空间集聚特征;(2)在空间格局上,川西南山区聚落宜居性呈现东南-西北两极分化格局,并且以西昌、攀枝花、石棉为3个核心呈核心-边缘梯级结构模式特点;(3)HH空间关联模式集中连片分布在安宁河谷一带,LL空间关联模式集中连片分布于大小凉山一带,西昌、石棉呈现HL空间关联模式;(4)川西南山区聚落宜居性与自然环境宜居度、经济宜居度、社会宜居度均具有极显著的相关性

Abstract:

For the mountain livability evaluation, the characteristics of vulnerability, risk and transportation difficulties need to be considered in the mountain areas. We combine the actual situation of mountain areas, and take into account three dimensions such as residence suitability degree of natural environment, residence suitability degree of economic and social to establish the mountain settlement livability evaluation system and evaluation model. Mountain settlement livability evaluation system is composed of target layers, criteria layers and indicator layers. The target layers include natural environment livable degree, economic livable degree and social livable degree. Natural environment livable degree includes four criteria layers, such as topography, water resources, ecological resources, land resources. Economic livable degree includes the criteria layer, such as economic development. Social livable degree includes four criteria layers, such as living convenience, medical and education, housing conditions, and space allocation. Twenty six mountainous counties in southwest Sichuan are systematically evaluated by mountain settlement livability evaluation model. The livable indices of twenty six counties in southwest Sichuan are calculated through range method. Based on ESDA analysis and correlation analysis in SPSS, spatial disparities of mountain settlement livability in southwest Sichuan are analyzed. The results indicate as follows. (1) The mountain settlement livability of southwest Sichuan has a positive correlation, showing a strong spatial clustering characteristics. The counties with high livability trend to be adjacent and the counties with low livability tend to be adjacent. (2) The mountain settlement livability is unbalanced distribution in twenty six counties of southwestern Sichuan, among which the settlement livability of Renhe District is the highest with the value of 0.92, and the settlement livability of Zhaojue County is the lowest with the value of 0.29. From the perspective of spatial pattern, the mountain settlement livability of southwest Sichuan showes southeastnorthwest polarization pattern. Xichang City, Panzhihua City, Shimian County as the three cores, present the “coreedge” cascade structure model characteristics in the mountain settlement livability of southwest Sichuan. (3) The counties with HH spatial correlation model constitute the high value area of mountain settlement livability in southwest Sichuan and mainly contiguously distribute along the Anning valley area, accounting for 42.31% of the study area. The counties with LL spatial correlation model constitute the low value area of mountain settlement livability in southwest Sichuan and mainly contiguously distribute along the Liangshan area, accounting for 50% of the study area. In these areas, natural conditions are poor and the economic development level is low. The HL spatial association mode distribute at the Xichang and Shimian. The speed of economic development in the counties with HL spatial correlation model is faster than that in the surrounding counties. Xichang is located on the island with backward economic development, near to the Panzhihua with high livable degree. So it is necessary to enhance interregional cooperation between Xichang and Panzhihua, and strengthen the radiating and driving role of Panzhihua economy district, and gradually realize the coordinative development of the different economy development. (4) There is significant high correlation between mountain settlement livability and natural environment livable degree, economic livable degree, social livable degree in southwest Sichuan.〖JP〗〖HJ1〗〖HJ

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宋玉芝,秦伯强, 高光. 附着生物对富营养化水体氮磷的去除效果[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(2): 180 .
[2] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[3] 刘滨谊,刘 琴. 服务于城市旅游形象的景观规划——以南京市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 164 -168 .
[4] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[5] 梁常德,龙天渝,李继承,刘腊美. 三峡库区非点源氮磷负荷研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 26 -30 .
[6] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[7] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[8] 吴丰林,周德民,胡金明. 基于景观格局演变的城市湿地景观生态规划途径[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 368 .
[9] 屈 璠,刘 敏,侯立军,许世远,刘巧梅,欧冬妮. 潮汐循环影响下上覆水环境因子和氮营养盐的变化及其相关关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 345 .
[10] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .