长江流域资源与环境 >> 2015, Vol. 24 >> Issue (09): 1471-1476.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201509005

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国碳排放库兹涅茨曲线实证研究——基于Gregory-Hansen协整分析

周少甫1, 赵明玲1, 苏龙2   

  1. 1. 华中科技大学经济学院, 湖北 武汉 430074;
    2. 长江职业学院, 湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-12 修回日期:2015-03-08 出版日期:2015-09-20
  • 作者简介:周少甫(1963~),男,教授,博士,博土研究生导师,主要研究方向为区域可持续发展.E-mail:sf_zhou19633@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(13YJA790166)

An empirical study of the carbon emissions kuznets curve for china——based on gregory-hansen cointegration test

ZHOU Shao-fu1, ZHAO Ming-ling1, SU Long2   

  1. 1. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China;
    2. Changjiang Professional College, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2015-01-12 Revised:2015-03-08 Online:2015-09-20
  • Contact: 苏龙,E-mail:546838332@qq.com E-mail:546838332@qq.com

摘要: 中国反复、多次出现大范围持续性雾霾天气使碳排放与经济增长问题成为理论界研究的热点,选取1978~2012年中国历年相关统计数据,采用Gregory-Hansen协整检验方法结合结构突变分析,实证检验我国碳排放与能源消费、经济增长及产业结构的关系。研究结果显示,中国碳排放环境库兹涅茨曲线为正U型,且该曲线存在结构突变;经济增长、能源消费、产业结构对碳排放都具有显著的增排效应。因此,建议在保证经济可持续的中高速增长前提下,通过提高能源利用效率、推进产业结构调整等措施来降低碳排放量,使"APEC蓝"能够成为一种"新常态"。

关键词: 碳排放, 结构突变, Gregory-Hansen协整, 环境库兹涅茨曲线

Abstract: Since China suffered the wide range of continuous fog haze weather frequently, the research of the cointegrating relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth has become a hot topic. As carbon emissions and economic developed rapidly in China, China is now the world's second-biggest economy and the biggest carbon emitter. It is of great significance to study the relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth. This study revisits the cointegrating relationship among carbon emission, energy consumption, economic growth and industrial structure change for China using the LM unit root test and the Gregory-Hansen cointegration test with a view of testing the environmental Kuznet's curve hypothesis in the presence of possible regime shift in long run relationship of the variables for the period 1978 to 2012 with the support of GAUSS 8.0. The problem of multicollinearity will likely result in distortion of model estimates using the least squares method directly. We used the ridge regression method to fit the model with the support of SPSS 18. The results showed that: (a) According to the results of ADF, KPSS and LM unit root test, carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and industrial structure were unit root process sequences which is a prerequisite for cointegrating analysis. (b) The Gregory-Hansen cointegrating test showed that there indeed exists a cointegrating relationship among carbon emission, energy consumption, economic growth and industrial structure change in the case of structural break situations, and the break point is 1997. (c) Taking 1997 as the cut-off point, we divided the sample into two stages for analysis. Due to the presence of multicollinearity problem, we use the ridge regression analysis at each stage, which is more accurate than the OLS regression. Energy consumption, economic growth have a significant increase in carbon emissions. The coefficient of Y2 is positive, which indicates that China's carbon emissions Kuznets curve has a U-shaped structure. China's economic development has not brought about a turning point reduction in carbon emissions which remains increasing with the economic development now. Comparing the results of the two periods, the elasticity coefficient of the carbon emissions for INS is not significant in the first stage and 2.02 in the second stage, which means that under other conditions unchanged, the industrial structure has a significant increase compared to the previous impact on carbon emissions. Based on this, strategies of improving energy efficiency, industrial structure regulation are proposed for carbon emissions reduction to make the "APEC blue" a "new normal".

Key words: carbon emissions, structural change, Gregory-Hansen cointegration, EKC

中图分类号: 

  • F062.2
[1] GROSSMAN G M, KRUEGER A B. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1991.
[2] 周五七,聂 鸣.碳排放与碳减排的经济学研究文献综述[J].经济评论,2012(5):144-151.
[3] 林伯强,蒋竺均.中国二氧化碳的环境库兹涅茨曲线预测及影响因素分析[J].管理世界,2009(4):27-36.
[4] 郭朝先.产业结构变动对中国碳排放的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(7):15-20.
[5] 李 健,周 慧.中国碳排放强度与产业结构的关联分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(1):7-14.
[6] 张兆响,廖先玲,王晓松.中国煤炭消费与经济增长的变结构协整分析[J].资源科学,2008,30(9):1282-1289.
[7] 师 博.能源消费、结构突变与中国经济增长:1952-2005[J].当代经济科学,2007,29(5):94-100.
[8] 张炎涛.经济增长与能源消费关系再研究——基于阈值协整的分析[J].贵州财经学院学报,2012(1):19-26.
[9] 许冬兰,李 琰.城市化进程中能源消耗和经济增长关系研究——基于山东省的实证分析[J].青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版),2011,27(1):17-22.
[10] OZTURK I, ACARAVCI A. The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey[J]. Energy Economics, 2013, 36: 262-267.
[11] 蒋金荷.中国碳排放量测算及影响因素分析[J].资源科学,2011,33(4):597-604.
[12] YAVUZ N Ç. CO2 emission, energy consumption, and economic growth for Turkey: Evidence from a cointegration test with a structural break[J]. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 2014, 9(3): 229-235.
[13] 栾惠德.带有结构突变的单位根检验——文献综述[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007,24(3):152-161.
[14] ZIVOT E, ANDREWS D W K. Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis[J]. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2002, 20(1): 25-44.
[15] LEE J, STRAZICICH M C. Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break[Z]. Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, No 04-17, 2004: 1-15
[16] PERRON P. The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1989, 57(6): 1361-1401.
[17] GREGORY A W, HANSEN B E. Practitioners corner: tests for cointegration in models with regime and trend shifts[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1996, 58(3): 555-560.
[1] 黄蕊, 陆玉麒, 陆梦秋. 不同能源政策下苏浙沪能源消费碳排放高峰估计[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(01): 15-25.
[2] 戴刘冬, 周锐, 张凤娥, 王新军. 城市土地利用对居民通勤碳排放的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(Z1): 68-77.
[3] 崔玮, 苗建军, 邹伟. 武汉城市圈土地利用空间关联的碳排放效率及其收敛性分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(12): 1824-1831.
[4] 李建豹, 黄贤金. 基于空间面板模型的碳排放影响因素分析——以长江经济带为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(10): 1665-1671.
[5] 张苗, 陈银蓉, 周浩. 基于面板数据的土地集约利用水平与土地利用碳排放关系研究——以1996~2010年湖北省中心城市数据为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(09): 1464-1470.
[6] 王俊松, 贺灿飞. 能源消费、经济增长与中国CO2排放量变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(01): 18-.
[7] 杨万平, 袁晓玲. 环境库兹涅茨曲线假说在中国的经验研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(8): 704-.
[8] 李海鹏, 张俊飚. 中国农业面源污染与经济发展关系的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(6): 585-.
[9] 帅 通, 袁 雯. 上海市产业结构和能源结构的变动对碳排放的影响及应对策略[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(10): 885-.
[10] 杜 江, 刘 渝. 城市化与环境污染:中国省际面板数据的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(6): 825-825.
[11] 邓志强,任淑花. 长株潭地区经济增长与工业污染变迁的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 517-517.
[12] 田晓四, 陈 杰,朱 诚,朱同林. 南京市经济增长与工业“三废”污染水平计量模型研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 410-410.
[13] 周 静, 杨桂山, 戴胡爽. 经济发展与环境退化的动态演进——环境库兹涅茨曲线研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(4): 414-414.
[14] 王宜虎,崔 旭,陈 雯. 南京市经济发展与环境污染关系的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 142-146.
[15] 王学山, 吴 豪, 陈 雯. 区域环境质量与经济发展关系模型研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(4): 317-321.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 娜,许有鹏, 陈 爽. 苏州城市化进程对降雨特征影响分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 335 -339 .
[2] 张 政, 付融冰| 杨海真, 顾国维. 水量衡算条件下人工湿地对有机物的去除[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(3): 363 .
[3] 孙维侠, 赵永存, 黄 标, 廖菁菁, 王志刚, 王洪杰. 长三角典型地区土壤环境中Se的空间变异特征及其与人类健康的关系[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(1): 113 .
[4] 时连强,李九发,应 铭,左书华,徐海根. 长江口没冒沙演变过程及其对水库工程的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 458 -464 .
[5] 张代钧,许丹宇,任宏洋,曹海彬,郑 敏,刘惠强. 长江三峡水库水污染控制若干问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 605 -610 .
[6] 王肇磊, 贺新枝. 晚清时期湖北自然灾害的治理及其经验教训[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(11): 1080 .
[7] 韦 杰, 贺秀斌. 人类活动对嘉陵江流域泥沙负荷的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(2): 196 .
[8] 彭 峰. 国际法与比较法视野中的水权研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 287 .
[9] 郑建蕊| 蒋卫国, 周廷刚, 侯鹏, 李雪. 洞庭湖区湿地景观指数选取与格局分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 305 .
[10] 黄, 薇, 陈 进, 王 波. 梯级开发对河流径流过程和水温过程均化作用的研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(03): 335 .