长江流域资源与环境 >> 2016, Vol. 25 >> Issue (11): 1781-1788.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201611018

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    

大型底栖动物快速评价指数BMWP在太子河流域的应用

冷龙龙1,2, 张海萍2, 张敏2, 李天科1, 刘晓波2,3, 渠晓东2,3   

  1. 1. 山东农业大学水利土木工程学院, 山东 泰安 271018;
    2. 中国水利水电科学研究院水环境研究所, 北京 100038;
    3. 中国水利水电科学研究院流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室, 北京 100038
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-25 修回日期:2016-03-08 出版日期:2016-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 渠晓东,E-mail:quxiaodong@iwhr.com E-mail:quxiaodong@iwhr.com
  • 作者简介:冷龙龙(1988~),男,硕士研究生,主要从事河流生态学、水生生物学研究.E-mail:1042909051@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(51439007,51479219,51208483);流域水循环模拟与调控国家重点实验室培育项目(2014RC01)

APPLICATION OF THE BIOLOGICAL MONITORING WORKING PARTY (BMWP) SCORE SYSTEM OF MACROINVERTEBRATES FOR RIVER HEALTH IN TAIZI RIVER BASIN

LENG Long-long1,2, ZHANG Hai-ping2, ZHANG Min2, LI Tian-ke1, LIU Xiao-bo2,3, QU Xiao-dong2,3   

  1. 1. Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering Colleges, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China;
    2. The Department of Water Environmental, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China;
    3. State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in the River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
  • Received:2016-01-25 Revised:2016-03-08 Online:2016-11-20
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation Programs(51439007,51479219,51208483);State key Laboratory of Water Cycle Simulation and Regulation Breeding Program(2014RC01)

摘要: 大型底栖动物快速生物评价方法可快速判断河流在人为活动影响下的生态状况,对河流健康评价研究和河流保护与管理具有重要的意义。基于太子河46个样点的大型底栖动物监测数据,探讨大型底栖动物生物监测工作组(Biological Monitoring Working Party,BMWP)指数的适用性。采用方差分析研究了BMWP指数对重要水环境参数的响应程度,研究结果表明BMWP指数随地表水水质级别的降低呈显著地下降趋势。利用回归分析研究了BMWP指数与其他生物指数、生境状况的回归关系,结果显示BMWP指数与底栖动物香农多样性指数(R2=0.74)、底栖动物完整性指数(R2=0.85)以及生境质量评估指数(R2=0.60)均呈显著线性回归关系(p<0.01),表明BMWP指数可以有效指示与反映不同河段的生物状况及其栖息地质量。利用BMWP指数对采样点进行的河流健康评价结果显示太子河46个采样点中,极好和良好的采样点占45.7%,一般的样点占21.7%,差和极差的样点为32.6%。BMWP指数对河流生态状况指示灵敏,能够准确反映河流健康状况。同时,野外监测、物种鉴定和指数计算简便,是河流健康评价中表征能力较强的快速生物评价指数。

关键词: 大型底栖动物, BMWP指数, 敏感值, 河流健康评价

Abstract: Benthic macroinvertebrates have been widely used in river health assessment. Selection of the fast and effective evaluation indices has important implications for health assessment area or river basin. This research is based on taizi River basin 46 sampling points of benthic macroinvertebrates and environment survey data in Taizi River Basin, through the BMWP sensitive index value revision and assessment of the level of division, single-factor analysis of variance to compare BMWP index values in the different water categories distribution, correlation analysis BMWP index and Shannon-Wiener diversity index and B-IBI index. Finally BMWP index on river health of Taizi River Basin were evaluated. Research results showed that:In general, when the river water becomes worse, BMWP mean was gradually decreased; linear regression analysis showed that, BMWP index with other three indices showed a significant linear regression relationship (R2=0.60-0.85, p<0.01), and could effectively indicate and reflect biological status and habitat quality in different sections. Evaluation on modified BMWP index sampling points showed that:Among Taizi River basin 46 sampling points, excellent and good sampling point accounted for 45.7%, the general sample accounted for 21.7%, and poor and very poor samples was 32.6%. The BMWP index analysis of the applicability showed that BMWP index can reflect the Taizi River basin River health more accurately, with simpler collection and identification than other biological index. BWMP index is a sign of river health assessment ability of rapid biological assessment for future regional assessment of large number of sample points and may provide some reference value.

Key words: Macroinvertebrate, BMWP, sensitive value, river health bioassessment

中图分类号: 

  • X826
[1] 李镇, 张岩, 袁建平, 等. 大型底栖无脊椎动物在河流健康评价中的发展趋势[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2011, 9(4):96-101.[LI Z, ZHANG Y, YUAN J P, et al. Review of the role of benthic macro-invertebrates as indicators on river health assessment[J]. South-to-North Water Diversion and Water Science & Technology, 2011, 9(4):96-101.]
[2] 渠晓东, 刘志刚, 张远. 标准化方法筛选参照点构建大型底栖动物生物完整性指数[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(15):4661-4672.[QU X D, LIU Z G, ZHANG Y. Discussion on the standardized method of reference sites selection for establishing the Benthic-Index of Biotic Integrity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(15):4661-4672.]
[3] 龚志军, 谢平, 唐汇涓, 等. 水体富营养化对大型底栖动物群落结构及多样性的影响[J]. 水生生物学报, 2001, 25(3):210-216.[GONG Z J, XIE P, TANG H J, et al. The influence of eutrophycation upon community structure and biodiversity of macrozoobenthos[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 2001, 25(3):210-216.]
[4] 孙小玲, 蔡庆华, 李凤清, 等. 春季昌江大型底栖无脊椎动物群落结构及功能摄食类群的空间分布[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2012, 18(2):163-169.[SUN X L, CAI Q H, LI F Q, et al. Spatial distribution of community structure and functional feeding groups of macroinvertebrates of Changjiang River, a tributary of Poyang Lake in spring[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2012, 18(2):163-169.]
[5] 刘玉, VERMAAT J E, RUYTER E D D, 等. ISO-BMWP底栖动物监测法在中国河流有机污染评价中的修正及应用[J]. 中山大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 43(4):102-105.[LIU Y, VERMEET J E, RUYTER E D D, et al. Modification and application of biomonitoring ISO-BMWP method of macrofauna in river pollution evaluation in China[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 2004, 43(4):102-105.]
[6] HELLAWELL J M. Biological indicators of freshwater pollution and environmental management[M]. Amsterdam:Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, 1986:173-174.
[7] COTA L, GOULART M, MORENO P, et al. Rapid assessment of river water quality using an adapted BMWP index:a practical tool to evaluate ecosystem health[J]. Internationale Vereinigung fur Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie Verhandlungen, 2003, 28(4):1713-1716.
[8] ALBA-TERCEDOR J, SÁNCHEZ-ORTEGA A. Un método rápido y simple para evaluar la calidad biológica de las aguas corrientes basado en el de Hellawell (1978)[J]. Limnetica, 1988, 4:51-56.
[9] ZEYBEK M, KALYONCU H, KARAKAŞ B, et al. The use of BMWP and ASPT indices for evaluation of water quality according to macroinvertebrates in Değirmendere Stream (Isparta, Turkey)[J]. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 2014, 38(5):603-613.
[10] MUSTOW S E. Biological monitoring of rivers in Thailand:use and adaptation of the BMWP score[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2002, 479(1/3):191-229.
[11] 张楠, 孟伟, 张远, 等. 辽河流域河流生态系统健康的多指标评价方法[J]. 环境科学研究, 2009, 22(2):162-170.[ZHANG N, MENG W, ZHANG Y, et al. Multi-variable assessment of river ecosystem health in Liao River Basin[J]. Research Of Environmental Sciences, 2009, 22(2):162-170.]
[12] 张远, 徐成斌, 马溪平, 等. 辽河流域河流底栖动物完整性评价指标与标准[J]. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(6):919-927.[ZHANG Y, XU C B, MA X P, et al. Biotic integrity index and criteria of benthic organizms in Liao River Basin[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2007, 27(6):919-927.]
[13] 孙伟胜, 顾钱洪, 董静, 等. 淮河流域板桥水库大型底栖动物群落结构及水质生物学评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(9):2843-2851.[SUN W S, GU Q H, DONG J, et al. Macrobenthic community structure and bioassessment for water quality of Banqiao Reservoir in Huaihe River basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(9):2843-2851.]
[14] 段学花, 王兆印, 余国安. 以底栖动物为指示物种对长江流域水生态进行评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(3):241-247.[DU X H, WANG Z Y, YU G A. Ecological assessment of the yangtze river eco-system with benthic invertebrate as indicator species[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2009, 18(3):241-247.]
[15] 龚昱田, 池世运, 常剑波, 等. 基于底栖动物指标的赤水河流域水质生物学评价[J]. 水利水电快报, 2012, 33(1):39-44.[GONG Y T, CHI S Y, CHANG J B, et al. Water quality assessment for Chishui River Basin using macro-invertebrates as bio-indicators[J]. Express Water Resources & Hydropower Information, 2012, 33(1):39-44.]
[16] 耿世伟, 渠晓东, 张远, 等. 大型底栖动物生物评价指数比较与应用[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(7):2281-2287.[GENG S W, QU X D, ZHANG Y, et al. Comparison and application of biological indices of macroinvertebrates in river health assessment[J]. Environmental Science, 2012, 33(7):2281-2287.]
[17] BUSS D F, SALLES F F. Using baetidae species as biological indicators of environmental degradation in a Brazilian River Basin[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2007, 130(1/3):365-372.
[18] 王艳杰, 李法云, 范志平, 等. 大型底栖动物在水生态系统健康评价中的应用[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2012, 28(5):90-96.[WANG Y J, LI F Y, FAN Z P, et al. The application of benthic macroinvertebrates in aquatic ecosystem health assessment[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2012, 28(5):90-96.]
[19] 渠晓东, 张远, 马淑芹, 等. 太子河流域大型底栖动物群落结构空间分布特征[J]. 环境科学研究, 2013, 26(5):509-515.[QU X D, ZHANG Y, MA S Q, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of macroinvertebrate communities in Taizi River Basin[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2013, 26(5):509-515.]
[20] 国家环保总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 中国环境科学出版社, 1997.
[21] 郑丙辉, 张远, 李英博. 辽河流域河流栖息地评价指标与评价方法研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(6):928-936.[ZHENG B H, ZHANG Y, LI Y B. Study of indicators and methods for river habitat assessment of Liao River Basin[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2007, 27(6):928-936.]
[22] 王备新, 杨莲芳. 我国东部底栖无脊椎动物主要分类单元耐污值[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(12):2768-2775.[WANG B X, YANG L F. A study on tolerance values of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa in eastern China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(12):2768-2775.]
[23] 赵瑞, 高欣, 丁森, 等. 辽河流域大型底栖动物耐污值[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(14):4797-4809.[ZHAO R, GAO X, DING S, et al. Tolerance values of macroinvertebrate taxa in Liao River basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(14):4797-4809.]
[24] JUNQUEIRA V M, CAMPOS S C M. Adaptation of the "BMWP" method for water quality evaluation to Rio das Velhas watershed (Minas Gerais, Brazil)[J]. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 1998, 10(2):125-135.
[25] GUTIÉRREZ-FONSECA P E, LORION C M. Application of the BMWP-Costa Rica biotic index in aquatic biomonitoring:sensitivity to collection method and sampling intensity[J]. Revista de Biologia Tropical, 2014, 62(S2):275-289.
[26] 吴东浩, 王备新, 张咏, 等. 底栖动物生物指数水质评价进展及在中国的应用前景[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2011, 34(2):129-134.[WU D H, WANG B X, ZHANG Y, et al. Advances in the use of biotic index for water quality bioassessment with benthic macroinvertebrate and its perspective in China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011, 34(2):129-134.]
[27] 郝卫民, 王士达, 王德铭. 洪湖底栖动物群落结构及其对水质的初步评价[J]. 水生生物学报, 1995, 19(2):124-134.[HAO W M, WANG S D, WANG D M. The community structure of benthic macroinvertebrates and the assessment of water quality in Honghu Lake[J]. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 1995, 19(2):124-134.]
[28] SILVEIRA M P, BAPTISTA D F, BUSS D F, et al. Application of biological measures for stream integrity assessment in south-east Brazil[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2005, 101(1/3):117-128.
[29] MARCHANT R. Do rare species have any place in multivariate analysis for bioassessment?[J]. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 2002, 21(2):311-313.
[30] MORAIS M, PINTO P, GUILHERME P, et al. Assessment of temporary streams:the robustness of metric and multimetric indices under different hydrological conditions[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2004, 516(1/3):229-249.
[1] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529-2539.
[2] 杨吉强, 郑珉磊, 王琼, 薛俊增, 吴惠仙. 不同滩涂促淤围垦方式对大型底栖动物群落的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(09): 1358-1367.
[3] 李文浩, 张萌, 门吉帅, 敖雪夫, 胡新艳, 欧阳珊, 吴小平. 江西仙女湖流域大型底栖动物群落结构及水质评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(08): 1218-1227.
[4] 渠晓东,蔡庆华,谢志才,唐 涛,曹 明,黎道丰. 香溪河附石性大型底栖动物功能摄食类群研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 738-738.
[5] 姜苹红,梁小民,陈 芳,周易勇,王洪铸. 月湖底栖动物的空间格局及其对水草可恢复区的指示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 502-505.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 曾慧卿. 近40年气候变化对江西自然植被净第一性生产力的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 227 .
[2] 徐祖信,叶建锋. 前置库技术在水库水源地面源污染控制中的应用[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(6): 792 -795 .
[3] 张青青,张世熔,李婷,张林,林晓利,. 基于多元数据的景观格局演变及其影响因素——以流沙河流域宜东段为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 125 -130 .
[4] 胡大伟,卞新民,许 泉. 基于ANN的土壤重金属分布和污染评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(4): 475 -479 .
[5] 张洁| 张志斌| 孙欣欣. 云南省矿产资源开发利用中的主要环境问题[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(Sup1): 61 -65 .
[6] 周国忠,冯海霞. 浙江省旅游资源地区差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 157 -163 .
[7] 邹小兵,曾 婷,TRINA MACKIE,肖尚友,夏之宁. 嘉陵江下游江段春季浮游藻类特征及污染现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(4): 612 .
[8] 梁流涛, 曲福田, 王春华. 基于DEA方法的耕地利用效率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(2): 242 .
[9] 罗璐琴, 周敬宣, 李湘梅. 生态足迹动态预测模型构建与分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 440 .
[10] 刘德富,黄钰铃,| 王从锋,. 水工学的发展趋势——从传统水工学到生态水工学[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(1): 92 -96 .