长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (03): 700-711.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201903021

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于GIS与信息量模型的溪洛渡库区滑坡危险性评价

熊俊楠1,2,朱吉龙1,苏鹏程3,龚颖1,赵云亮1,李进1,李伟1   

  1. (1.西南石油大学土木工程与建筑学院,四川 成都 610500;2.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所资源与
    环境信息系统国家重点实验室,北京 100101;3.中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害研究所,四川 成都 610041)
  • 出版日期:2019-03-20 发布日期:2019-03-22

Risk Assessment of Landslide in the Xiluodu Reservoir Area Based on GIS and Information Value Method

XIONG Jun-nan1,2, ZHU Ji-long1, SU Peng-cheng3, GONG Ying1, ZHAO Yun-liang1, LI Jin1, LI Wei1   

  1. (1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, SWPU, Chengdu 610500, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental
     Information System, Institute of Geographic and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    3. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Conservancy,Chengdu 610041,China)
  • Online:2019-03-20 Published:2019-03-22

摘要: 通过高分辨率影像对溪洛渡库区段金沙江两岸5 km范围内滑坡灾害遥感解译,结合野外实地调查验证,已查明共有滑坡161处。从滑坡形成机理入手,选取高程、相对高差、坡度、坡向、岩性、地震、降雨等7个评价指标,首先分析滑坡与各因素的空间分布关系,然后采用层次分析法和信息量模型对研究区进行滑坡危险性评价。研究结果表明:(1)研究区滑坡易发生在高程600~1 300 m、高差100~700 m、坡度15°~40°的区域,降雨量越大,滑坡发生的概率越大,且坡向对滑坡发生也有影响,其中东、东南、西、西北方向的滑坡相对较多;(2)极高和高危险区占研究区总面积的27.86%,却包含研究区76.4%的滑坡数量,说明这些区域滑坡分布十分密集,危险程度较高,与实际情况相吻合;(3)极高危险区和高危险区主要集中在溪洛渡坝址沿江两岸附近区域、距离坝址约25~35 km的金沙江右岸区域和库尾金沙江左岸20 km范围区域,库区中段大部分区域都是中、低和极低危险区;(4)滑坡灾害点空间分布与危险评价等级之间相关性达0.970 3,利用ROC曲线对评价结果进行验证,评价结果理想,精度高达81.88%,可为库区防灾减灾工作提供理论支撑。

Abstract: According to the interpretation of high-resolution remote sensing images and field investigation on both sides of Jinsha River in the Xiluodu reservoir area, 161 landslides were identified. This paper started with the mechanism of landslide formation, and seven evaluation indies including elevation, height difference, slope, aspect, lithology, earthquake and rainfall were chosen to evaluate the hazard of landslides by AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) and information value method. The spatial distribution relationships between landslides and various factors were analyzed at first. The results showed that: (1) The landslide easily occurs in the regions with the elevation in the range of 600 - 1300 m, the height difference between 100 - 700 m, the slope between 15° - 40°, and with large rainfall. Moreover, the different slope aspects also had influence on the landslide, and there were relatively more landslides in the east, southeast and northwest direction. (2) The extremely high areas and the high risk areas accounted for 27.86% of the total study area, where 76.4% of the landslides locate, indicating that the landslides were very dense in these areas and the risk was relatively high, which was consistent with the actual situation. (3) The extremely high risk areas and the high risk areas mainly concentrate in the Xiluodu dam site along the river, which was the right bank area of the Jinsha River about 25 to 35 km away from the site of the dam, and the left bank area of the Jinsha River with 20 km away from the reservoir tail. And most of the areas in the middle section of the reservoir were moderate risk areas. (4) The correlation coefficient between the spatial distribution of landslide hazards and the risk assessment grade was 0.970 3. Verified by ROC curves, the evaluation results were ideal with the accuracy of 81.88%, which can provide theoretical supports for the disaster prevention and mitigation work in the reservoir area.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 梅 艳, 刘友兆, 梁流涛. 基于相对承载力的区域可持续发展研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 341 .
[2] 张文广,胡远满, 刘 淼,杨兆平,常 禹,李秀珍,杨 孟,问青春, . 基于土地利用变化的生态服务价值损益估算——以岷江上游地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2007, 16(6): 821 .
[3] 刘波, 成长春. 江苏沿海地区经济联系及物流要素流量空间特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(06): 653 .
[4] 郝 莹 |鲁 俊 |温华洋 |郑媛媛 |卢燕宇. 安徽省近49年短历时强降水事件趋势变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(9): 1143 .
[5] 袁文德, 郑江坤. 1962~2012年西南地区极端温度事件时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(07): 1246 -1254 .
[6] 卢中辉, 余斌, 刘传明, 宋仁波, 吴清. 都市圈边缘城市经济联系格局及发展策略研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(03): 365 -374 .
[7] 黄国华, 刘传江, 赵晓梦. 长江经济带碳排放现状及未来碳减排[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(04): 638 -644 .
[8] 王 琦1,易桂花2*,张廷斌1,3,4,别小娟1,刘 栋1,何 冬1,徐嘉昕1. 基于生态足迹模型的四川省耕地资源评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(01): 51 .
[9] 袁博, 郭梦京, 周孝德, 郑兴. 气候变化及人类活动对河流溶解性有机质(DOM)影响的研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1440 .
[10] 廖炜, 李璐, 杨伟, 吴宜进. 城镇化过程中的流域面源污染时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1776 .