长江流域资源与环境 >> 2019, Vol. 28 >> Issue (10): 2484-2490.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201910020

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态保护红线制度的理论证成与中国实践

莫张勤   

  1. (浙江大学光华法学院,浙江 杭州 310000)
  • 出版日期:2019-10-20 发布日期:2019-11-05

China’s Practice and Theory of Ecological Protection Red Line

MO Zhang-qin   

  1. (Zhejiang University Guanghua Law School,Hangzhou 310000,China)
  • Online:2019-10-20 Published:2019-11-05

摘要: 生态保护红线制度正处于从政策转换为法律的关键时期,亟需深入研究新时代背景下生态保护红线制度的内在机理和法治化路径,为生态文明体制改革提供决策依据,进而保障全国与区域的生态安全。生态保护红线制度以综合生态系统方法理论为指导,是综合生态系统方法理论的具体应用,主要体现在生态空间规划管控制度、生态空间分类分级管制制度和有效性评估制度中。生态系统的整体性视角分析,生态空间规划管控制度建立统一框架,将关联性部门纳入到自然资源管理与实施活动中,进行利益的调节与分配;生态系统管理方式的灵活性角度分析,依据生态空间的弹性和承载能力的不同,采取适应性管理和缓解措施,建立分类分级管制制度;生态系统的动态性方面分析,生态系统的结构和功能随着时间的改变而改变,必须考虑生态系统结构和功能的短期和长期影响,建立有效性评估制度。

Abstract: Now is a critical period of the red lines for ecological protection that from the policy to law. It is urgent to study deeply the internal mechanism and the legalization path of the red lines for ecological protection especially under the background of the new era. It also provides the decision-making basis for the ecological civilization system reforming, thereby to ensuring the national and regional ecological security. The red lines for ecological protection is guided by the comprehensive ecosystem method theory and is the specific application of the theory. It is mainly embodied in the ecological spatial planning management degree, the ecological space classification and classification control system and the effectiveness evaluation system. From the perspective of the overall of the ecosystem, the spatial control of the ecological space planning should be established in a unified framework, which is include the relevant departments to supervise and implement of the natural resources, to distribute and adjust the benefits. According to the flexibility analysis of the ecosystem management method, it adopts the policy of establishing a classification control system through the adaptive management and mitigation measures which is based on the flexibility of the ecological space and the carrying capacity. On the opinion of analysis the dynamism of the ecosystems, the structure and function of ecosystems change with time. Setting up an effective evaluation mechanism must consider the impacts of the short and long-term ecosystem structure and function.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王宜虎,崔 旭,陈 雯. 南京市经济发展与环境污染关系的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(2): 142 -146 .
[2] 赵素婷| 厉恩华|蔡晓斌| 王学雷| 姜刘志 |燕然然. 鄂西亚高山泥炭藓沼泽湿地高等植物多样性研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(04): 468 .
[3] 黄红铸 |崔玉娟 |叶 瑜 |方修琦. 江浙沪地区历史重大洪涝灾害情景下的人口和GDP物理暴露量分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(06): 801 .
[4] 戴其文,彭瑜,刘澈元,翟禄新. 猫儿山自然保护区生态受益者支付意愿及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(07): 911 .
[5] 赵平伟, 郭萍, 李立印, 舒珺. SPEI及SPI指数在滇西南地区干旱演变中的对比分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(01): 142 -149 .
[6] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[7] 苏 芳, 郑亚萍, 阚立娜, 蔡 莎. 基于CVM调查法评估城市公共绿地服务价值 ——以西部省会城市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2434 -2442 .
[8] 高洁芝, 郑华伟, 刘友兆. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的土地利用多功能性诊断[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2496 -2504 .
[9] 邱 宇, 陈英姿, 饶清华, 林秀珠, 陈文花. 基于排污权的闽江流域跨界生态补偿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2839 -2847 .
[10] 胡兴坤, 高 雷, 杨 浩, 刘绍平, 陈大庆, 段辛斌 . 长江中游黄石江段鱼类早期资源现状[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 60 -67 .