长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (2): 360-368.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202002008

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

大冶湖浮游细菌群落结构及其环境影响因子研究

邹沈娟1,尹立强2,赵博礼1,肖思进1,陈培培1,魏蒲生2,马徐发1*   

  1. (1.华中农业大学水产学院,湖北 武汉 430070;2. 大冶湖生态文化旅游开发有限公司,湖北 黄石 435100)
  • 出版日期:2020-02-20 发布日期:2020-02-20

Study on Bacterioplankton Communities Composition and the Related Environmental Factors in the Daye Lake

ZOU Sheng-juan1,YIN Li-qiang2,XIAO Si-jin1,CHEN Pei-pei1,WEI Pu-sheng2,MA Xu-fa1   

  1. (1. College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;2. Daye Lake Ecological Cultural Tourism Development Co., Ltd., Huangshi 435100, China)
  • Online:2020-02-20 Published:2020-02-20

摘要: 为了解大冶湖浮游细菌的群落结构,探究其环境影响因素,于2018年2月和2018年7月,采用16S rRNA高通量测序技术分析比较了大冶湖水体中枯水期和丰水期细菌群落结构及其多样性的差异,并通过冗余分析(RDA)探讨水体环境因子与细菌群落结构及其多样性的关系。结果表明:大冶湖的浮游细菌具有较高的菌群多样性(枯水期和丰水期的Shannon指数分别为3.856±0.642和4.165±0.608)。大冶湖水体的主要细菌门为变形菌门(Proteobacteria)、放线菌门(Actinobacteria)、蓝细菌门(Cyanobacteria)、拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)、厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)、浮霉菌门(Planctomycetes)、疣微菌门(Verrucomicrobia)、绿菌门(Chlorobi)、绿弯菌门(Chloroflexi)。其中,枯水期优势菌群为β-变形菌纲(Betaproteobacteria,44.73%),丰水期优势菌群为蓝细菌门(Cyanobacteria,31.39%)和放线菌门(Actinobacteria,31.37%)。冗余分析结果表明,硝酸盐(NO-3-N)、温度(T)和总氮(TN)为影响细菌群落分布的主要环境因子。

Abstract: In order to clarify the composition of bacterioplankton communities and the environmental factors involved, we collected samples of bacterioplankton and monitored some main environmental indexes in February 2018 and July 2018 respectively in the Daye Lake. Basing on 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing, we analyzed and compared the differences in composition and diversity of bacterial communities in the Daye Lake during the dry season and the wet season. We conducted the redundancy analysis (RDA) to explore the relationship between environment factors and composition and diversity of bacterial communities in the water. The results showed that the bacterioplankton had high microbial diversity in the Daye Lake. The Shannon indexes of dry season and wet season were 3.856±0.642 and 4.165±0.608, respectively. The main bacterial categories were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia, Chlorobi and Chloroflexi. In this case, the dominant bacteria was Betaproteobacteria (44.73%) in dry season. In wet season, however, the dominant bacteria were Cyanobacteria (31.39%) and Actinobacteria (31.37%). Redundancy analysis showed that nitrate (NO-3-N), temperature (T) and total nitrogen (TN) were the main environmental factors affecting the distribution of bacterial communities.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 蔡邦成,陆根法,宋莉娟,陈克亮. 南水北调东线水源地保护区生态建设的生态经济效益评估[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(3): 384 -387 .
[2] 梅 艳, 刘友兆, 梁流涛. 基于相对承载力的区域可持续发展研究——以江苏省为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(3): 341 .
[3] . 气候资料高精度模拟与土地利用动力学方法在中国水文规划中的应用(论文摘编)[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(5): 649 .
[4] 段学军, 陈 雯. 省域空间开发功能区划方法探讨[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 540 -545 .
[5] 桑连海,陈 进. 长江流域的节水形势及发展方向[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006, 15(1): 10 -13 .
[6] 陶豫萍,吴 宁,罗 鹏,刘 兵. 森林对污染物(SO2-4)的过滤器效应研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(5): 628 -632 .
[7] 张维昊,宋立荣,徐小清,刘永定,张锡辉. 天然水体中微囊藻毒素归宿的初步研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2004, 13(1): 84 -88 .
[8] 郭渠, 孙卫国, 程炳岩, 段春锋. 重庆近48年来高温天气气候特征及其环流形势[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 52 .
[9] 李成范,刘岚, 周廷刚,张力, 吴忠芳. 基于定量遥感技术的重庆市热岛效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2009, 18(1): 60 .
[10] 潘竟虎. 近15年来长江源区土地利用变化及其生态环境效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2005, 14(3): 310 -315 .