长江流域资源与环境 >> 2020, Vol. 29 >> Issue (8): 1713-1722.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202008004

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于网络信息的江西省乡村旅游地吸引力评价及空间分析

朱中原1,2,3,王  蓉1,2,3,胡  静1,2,3* ,李亚娟1,2,3   

  1. (1.华中师范大学城市与环境科学学院,湖北 武汉 430079;2.中国旅游研究院武汉分院,湖北 武汉 430079;3.华中师范大学地理过程分析与模拟湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉430079)
  • 出版日期:2020-08-20 发布日期:2020-09-21

Evaluation and Spatial Analysis of the Attractiveness of Rural Tourism Destinations in Jiangxi Province Based on Network Information

ZHU Zhong-yuan 1,2,3, WANG Rong 1,2,3, HU Jing 1,2,3, LI Ya-juan 1,2,3   

  1. (1. The College of Urban and Environmental Science, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China; 2. Wuhan Branch of China Tourism Academy, Wuhan 430079, China;3. Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation Hubei Province, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)
  • Online:2020-08-20 Published:2020-09-21

摘要: 旅游吸引力是目的地旅游发展的动力源泉,基于需求侧的旅游吸引力评价对于乡村旅游地的经营管理和市场营销具有重要的指导意义。以江西省为例,在乡村旅游地类型划分的基础上,构建了基于网络信息的乡村旅游地吸引力评价体系,同时采用空间自相关和核密度分析方法分析了乡村旅游地吸引力的空间分布格局,研究发现:(1)江西省乡村旅游地可以划分为生态观光类、休闲度假类、农事体验类、农业科技类、乡土文化类和特色村镇类六个大类和24个基本类型;(2)江西省乡村旅游地单体吸引力指数相差较大,不同类型乡村旅游地吸引力指数差别显著,生态观光类吸引力指数最高,农业科技类最低;(3)江西省乡村旅游地为旅游者带来了良好的游憩体验,旅游者整体满意度较高,但网络关注度与分享程度相对较低;(4)江西省乡村旅游地吸引力集聚特征显著,且主要集中在“南昌-九江-宜春”、“萍乡-宜春”、“上饶-景德镇”三大片区,各类型乡村旅游地吸引力集聚状况空间差异较大。基于研究结论,文章为江西乡村旅游吸引力的提升及未来乡村旅游的发展提出了针对性的意见与建议。

Abstract: Tourism attraction is the driving force for the development of tourism destinations. The evaluation of tourism attraction based on demand side has crucial guiding significance for the management and marketing of rural tourism. Taking Jiangxi Province as an example, this paper divides the rural tourism destination types, constructed the rural tourism attraction evaluation system based on network information. Meanwhile, it uses spatial autocorrelation and kernel density analysis to analyze the spatial distribution pattern of rural tourism destinations’ attraction. The finding shows that: (1) The rural tourism destinations in Jiangxi can be divided into six categories (ecological tourism, leisure and vacation, farming experience, agricultural science and technology, local culture and characteristic villages and towns) and 24 basic types. (2) The attractiveness index of single rural tourism destination in Jiangxi Province is quite different, and the attractiveness index of different types of rural tourism destinations also has significant difference. Specifically, the eco-tourism destinations’ attraction is the highest, while the categories of agricultural science and technology rural tourism destinations have the lowest attraction. (3) The rural tourism destinations have brought good leisure experience to tourists, and the overall satisfaction of tourists is relatively high, but the degrees of network attention and tourist sharing are quite low. (4) The attractiveness of rural tourism destinations is remarkably concentrated in the three major areas of “Nanchang-Jiujiang-Yichun”, “Pingxiang-Yichun” and “Shangrao-Jingdezhen”, and the spatial agglomeration pattern of various types of rural tourism destinations varies greatly. Based on the conclusions above, the study puts forward to four suggestions for improving the attractiveness of rural tourism in Jiangxi Province: (1) Excavate the characteristics of rural tourism resources and avoid the dilemma of homogenization and commercialization. (2) Enhance the development quality of less attractive rural tourism destinations based on resource advantages, and promote the coordinated development of different types of rural tourism destinations. (3) Strengthen the marketing and publicity of rural tourism sites, and enhance tourists’ network attention and sharing behavior. (4) Optimize the development pattern of rural tourism, and realize the balanced development of regional rural tourism in Jiangxi Province.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄亮,张国森. 长江徐六泾黑碳的季节变化及环境意义[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(09): 1202 .
[2] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[3] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[4] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .
[5] 畅华仪, 张俊飚, 何可, . 技术感知对农户生物农药采用行为的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 202 -211 .
[6] 闫东升, 王 晖, 孙 伟. 长江三角洲区域发展差距时空演变驱动因素研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 517 -529 .
[7] 杨子江, 韩伟超, 杨恩秀. 昆明市水资源承载力系统动力学模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(03): 594 -602 .
[8] 任世鑫 李二玲 邓晴晴 崔之珍. 中国三大粮食作物化肥施用特征及环境风险分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[9] 荣欣 易桂花 张廷斌 李景吉 别小娟 覃艺 夏杰. 2000-2015年川西高原植被EVI海拔梯度变化及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[10] 黄烈佳 杨鹏. 2019年7期长江经济带土地生态安全时空演化特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .