长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (12): 2982-2991.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202112017

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

生态补偿政策对农户湿地保护意愿及行为的影响研究 ——以鄱阳湖为例

  庞洁1,2,丘水林1,3,靳乐山1,3
  

  1. (1.中国农业大学人文与发展学院,北京 100193;2.农业农村部农村经济研究中心,北京 100810;
    3.中国生态补偿政策研究中心,北京 100193)
  • 出版日期:2021-12-20 发布日期:2022-01-07

Effect of Eco-compensation Policy on Farmers' Willing and Behavior of Wetlands Ecological Protection:Based on Poyang Lake

PANG Jie1,2, QIU Shui-lin1,3, JIN Le-shan1,3   

  1. (1.College of Humanities and Development Studies,China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193,China; 2.Research Center for
     Rural Economy,Beijing 100810,China; 3. China Eco-compensation Policy Research Center, Beijing 100193,China)
  • Online:2021-12-20 Published:2022-01-07

摘要: 湿地生态补偿政策是解决湿地生态保护与经济发展矛盾的重要环境管理工具。在分析生态补偿政策对农户湿地保护意愿和行为影响机理的基础上,在传统计划行为理论中加入了生态补偿政策变量,以鄱阳湖湿地为例,运用结构方程模型,实证分析了湿地生态补偿政策和心理因素对农户湿地保护意愿及行为的影响。结果表明:(1)湿地生态补偿政策除对农户湿地保护行为能够产生直接影响外,还可以通过影响湿地保护意愿而对农户湿地保护行为产生间接影响,但相较于对湿地保护意愿的影响效果在1%的水平下显著,生态补偿政策对湿地保护行为的直接影响效果仅在5%的水平下通过,说明生态补偿政策对湿地保护行为的直接激励效应尚未得到充分发挥,存在进一步提升的空间;(2)农户的心理变量(行为态度、主观规范、感知行为控制)对其湿地保护意愿具有显著的正向直接影响,并通过影响湿地保护意愿对农户湿地保护行为产生间接影响;(3)农户年龄越小、受教育水平越高、家庭劳动力比例越高,其湿地保护行为会越积极;(4)农户湿地保护意愿对保护行为影响的直接效应为0.640,且生态补偿政策、心理变量等因素都会通过湿地保护意愿而间接影响湿地保护行为。因此,有必要从完善湿地生态补偿政策和强化农户心理变量两个角度来激发农户湿地保护意愿和行为,进而达到更好的湿地保护效果。

Abstract: Wetland eco-compensation is an important policy tool to solve the problems of wetland ecological environment and effectively alleviate the contradiction between wetland protection and development and utilization, but the eco-compensation policy with the government as the main body often ignores and weakens the rights and interests of farmers. This paper theoretically analyzes the impact of eco-compensation on the willingness and behavior of farmers to protect wetlands, and reveals that the eco-compensation policy can influence the behavioral willingness of the group to form the herd effect, so as to make more farmers participate in the transformation of wetland protection. Taking Poyang lake wetland as an example, this paper introduces the eco-compensation policy, adopts the extended planning behavior theory and structural equation model, and makes an empirical analysis on the impact of eco-compensation policy and psychological factors on farmers’ wetland protection intentions and behaviors. Results showed that: (1) the eco-compensation policy can not only effectively motivate farmers directly participate in the wetland protection, can also through the positive influence on wetland protection will indirectly encourage farmers to participate in the wetland protection, but compared with effects on the wetland protection will significant under 1% level, eco-compensation policies directly affect the effect of wetland protection action only by under 5%, that eco-compensation policies for wetland protection behavior of incentive effect has not been fully play, there is further room for improvement. (2) the psychological variables of local farmers (behavior attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavior control) have a significant positive impact on the wetland protection intention of farmers, and indirectly affect the wetland protection behavior of farmers by influencing the wetland protection intention. (3) the direct effect of farmers' willingness to protect wetlands on their protection behavior is 0.640, and ecological compensation policies, psychological variables and other factors will indirectly affect wetland protection behavior through their willingness to protect wetlands, which fully demonstrates the importance of their willingness to protect wetlands on their protection behavior. Based on the results of the study, policy suggestions were put forward to improve farmers’ willingness and behavior of wetland protection from the perspective of adjusting wetland eco-compensation policy and strengthening farmers' psychological variables.


No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张鑫, 陈志刚. 经济增长激励、官员异质性与城市工业污染:以长三角地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1314 .
[2] 郭政, 董平, 陆玉麒, 黄群芳, 马颖忆. 长三角集装箱港口体系演化及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1340 .
[3] 蓝希, 刘小琼, 郭炎, 陈昆仑. “长江经济带”战略背景下武汉城市水环境承载力综合评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1345 .
[4] 罗能生, 王玉泽.彭郁, 李建明. 长江中游城市群生态效率的空间关系及其协同提升机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1349 .
[5] 刘钢, 刘坤琳, 汪玮茜, 赵爽. 水质感知视角下水库移民满意度分析——基于有序逻辑回归的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1355 .
[6] 戢晓峰, 刘丁硕. 基于3D理论与SEM的县域交通可达性与空间贫困的耦合机制[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1360 .
[7] 张大鹏, 曹卫东, 姚兆钊, 岳洋, 任亚文. 上海大都市区物流企业区位分布特征及其演化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1365 .
[8] 佘颖, 刘耀彬. 国内外绿色发展制度演化的历史脉络及启示[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1370 .
[9] 侯雯嘉, 陈长青, 乔辉, 孙新素, 周曙东. 1980~2009年长江下游地区油菜冻害时空特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1375 .
[10] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .