长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (2): 427-438.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202102017

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于遥感生态指数的甬江流域生态环境变化分析

缪鑫辉1,2,梁勤欧1,2*   

  1. (1.浙江师范大学地理与环境科学学院,浙江 金华 321004;
    2.浙江师范大学卫星遥感与环境灾害研究中心,浙江 金华 321004)
  • 出版日期:2021-02-20 发布日期:2021-03-18

Analysis of Ecological Environment Changes in Yongjiang River Basin Based on Remote Sensing Ecological Index

MIAO Xin-hui 1,2, LIANG Qin-ou 1,2   

  1. (1.College of Geography and Environmental Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China; 2.Remote Sensing Application & Environmental Disaster Research Center, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China)
  • Online:2021-02-20 Published:2021-03-18

摘要: 生态环境是人类生存发展的物质基础,城市化进程不断加快带来一系列生态环境问题,遥感技术可以快速、定量地评价生态环境变化。选取2000、2009、2017年Landsat遥感影像提取湿度、绿度、干度、热度4个评价指标,通过主成分分析方法计算遥感生态指数RSEI(Remote Sensing Ecological Index),对17年间甬江流域进行生态环境变化定量分析和动态监测评价。结果表明:(1)2000~2017年间甬江流域生态环境质量整体上呈下降趋势,2000、2009和2017年的RSEI均值分别为0.724、0.651和0.687,17年来下降了5.11%。(2)2000~2009年甬江流域生态逐步恶化,而2009~2017年生态环境质量有所改善;明显变差的面积为1 392.49 km 2,约占29.63%,明显好转的面积仅为699.1 km 2,仅占14.88%,呈现老城区变好,城市外围地带变差,林地、农田等保持稳定的特点。(3)在4个指标中,绿度指标的影响力较大,受建筑因素作用的热度指标影响力最具潜力,说明生态环境质量下降与不透水面的增加以及绿地景观的消减有关。

Abstract: A faster speed of urbanization causes a series of problems to ecological environment which is the material base for human’s survival and development. However, the changes of the ecological environment can be evaluated by remote sensing technology in a quick and quantitative manner. Landsat remote-sensing images in 2000, 2009 and 2017 were used to extract four evaluation indexes, namely, humidity, greenness, dryness and heat. The principal component analysis was also used to calculate RSEI (Remote Sensing Ecological Index) to carry out quantitative analysis and dynamic monitoring evaluation on the ecological environment change of Yongjiang River Basin during the 17 years. Results show: (1) The ecological environment in Yongjiang River Basin in 2000-2017 declined generally. RSEI in 2000, 2009 and 2017 was 0.724, 0.651 and 0.687 respectively. The total decline over the past 17 years was 5.11%. (2). The ecological environment in Yongjiang River Basin in 2000-2009 deteriorated gradually but improved in 2009-2017; The area that became worse obviously is 1 392.49 km 2, accounting for 29.63% approximately while the area that became better obviously is 699.1 km 2 only, accounting for 14.88% only. Generally speaking, the old urban area becomes better while the urban pheripheral area of cities become worse; forest, farmland, etc. maintain stable. (3) Among the four indexes, greenness exerts significant influence and the influence of heat affected by architecture is most potential, which implies that the reduction of ecological environment quality is related to the increase of impervious surface and the reduction of green landscape.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄炎忠 罗小锋 刘迪 余威震 唐林. 农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳的影响因素——对高意愿低行为的现象解释[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[2] 张英浩, 陈江龙, 程 钰. 环境规制对中国区域绿色经济效率的影响机理研究——基于超效率模型和空间面板计量模型实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2407 -2418 .
[3] 刘金科, 韩贵琳, 阳昆桦, 柳满. 九龙江流域河水溶解态碳的时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2578 -2587 .
[4] 盖豪 颜廷武 何可 张俊飚. 社会嵌入视角下农户保护性耕作技术采用行为研究——基于冀、皖、鄂三省668份农户调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[5] 匡亮, 张鹏, 杨洪雨, 梁瑞峰, 王远铭, 李克锋. 梯级水库叠梁门分层取水水温改善效果的衰减[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1244 -1251 .
[6] 洪步庭, 任平. 基于最小累积阻力模型的农村居民点用地生态适宜性评价——以都江堰市为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1386 -1396 .
[7] 孙 伟, 陈 雯, 刘崇刚, . 太湖流域水敏性与建设用地扩张的关联评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(07): 1575 -1582 .
[8] 程琳琳, 张俊飚, 何可. 网络嵌入与风险感知对农户绿色耕作技术采纳行为的影响分析——基于湖北省615个农户的调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(07): 1736 -1746 .
[9] 熊美华, 杨 志, 胡兴坤, 阙延福. 长江中游监利江段鱼类群落结构研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(09): 2109 -2118 .
[10] 徐金英, 蔡永久, 赵中华, 王晓龙. 长江干流滨江水体As空间梯度变化与健康风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(11): 2711 -2717 .