长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (2): 419-426.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202102016

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

2000~2018年鄂西山区植被EVI时空变化特征及其地形效应

陈亮1,2,王学雷1* ,杨超1,刘昔1,2,吕晓蓉1,范韦莹1,2   

  1. (1.中国科学院精密测量科学与技术创新研究院,环境与灾害监测评估湖北省重点实验室,
    湖北 武汉 430077;2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049)
  • 出版日期:2021-02-20 发布日期:2021-03-18

Spatio-temporal Variation Characteristics of Vegetation EVI and Their Topographic Effects in the West Mountain Regions of Hubei Province from 2000 to 2018

CHEN Liang 1,2,WANG Xue-lei 1,3,YANG Chao 1,3,LIU Xi 1,2 ,LV Xiao-rong 1,2,FAN Wei-ying 1,2   

  1. (1. Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Key Laboratory for Environment and
    Disaster Monitoring and Evaluation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077,China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049,China)
  • Online:2021-02-20 Published:2021-03-18

摘要: 分析鄂西山区植被EVI的空间分异、时空演变及地形效应,可为该区域生态环境的整体保护与分区保护提供理论支撑,也可为制定具有针对性的植被保护政策提供科学依据。基于MOD13Q1 EVI数据,运用一元线性回归趋势分析方法对2000~2018年鄂西山区EVI时空变化趋势进行了研究,并结合高程、坡度和坡向数据等探讨了其对地形的响应机制。结果表明:(1)鄂西山区EVI值整体上呈现北部低,中部和南部高,东部低西部高的空间分布特点。2000~2018年鄂西山区EVI平均值介于0.57~0.66之间,整体呈现改善态势。(2)EVI变化趋势主要以基本不变为主,占鄂西山区总面积的85.74%;轻微减少和显著减少区分别只占总面积的0.23%和0.17%,分布零散;轻微增加和显著增加区域分别占8.35%和5.51%,主要集中分布在北部和中部的丹江口市、郧阳区、郧西县、谷城县、南漳县、神农架等地区。(3)海拔<700 m以及坡度<14°区域是植被主要退化区;中海拔区域(700~1 700 m)以及坡度>14°区域是植被主要改善区。建议鄂西山区未来注重对低海拔、缓坡区域的植被保护。

Abstract: The analysis of the spatial differentiation, space-time evolution and topography effects of Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) in the mountainous region of Western Hubei can provide theoretical support for the overall protection and zoning protection of the ecological environment in the region, as well as scientific basis for the formulation of targeted vegetation protection policy. Based on MOD13Q1 EVI data, this paper studies the temporal and spatial variation trend of EVI in the mountainous region of Western Hubei from 2000 to 2018 with unitary linearity regression trend analysis , and discusses its response mechanism to terrain by combining the data of elevation, slope and slope direction. The results show that: (1) The EVI values in the mountainous region of Western Hubei are generally low in the north, high in the middle and south, and low in the east and high in the west. From 2000 to 2018, the average value of EVI in the mountainous region of Western Hubei ranges from 0.57 to 0.66, showing an overall improvement trend. (2)The variation trend of EVI is mainly basically unchanged, accounting for 85.74% of the total area of the Western Hubei mountain region; slightly reduced and significantly reduced areas accounted for only 0.23% and 0.17% of the total area respectively, with scattered distribution; slight increase and significant increase accounted for 8.35% and 5.51% respectively, mainly concentrated in the Northern and central Danjiangkou City, Yunyang District, Yunxi County, Gucheng County, Nanzhang County, Shennongjia and other areas. (3)Areas with an altitude of less than 700 m and a slope of less than 14° are the main vegetation degradation areas in the mountainous region of Western Hubei; the areas with an altitude of 700-1 700 m and a slope of more than 14° are the main vegetation improvement areas. It is suggested that the attention should be paid to the protection of vegetation at low-altitude and slow-slope areas in the mountainous region of Western Hubei in the future.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 伍新木. 创新体制 |转变发展方式[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(07): 786 .
[2] 王 磊, 李成丽.  

我国中部地区城市群多中心结构的增长效应 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2231 -2240 .

[3] 童小容, 杨庆媛, 毕国华, . 重庆市2000~2015年土地利用变化时空特征分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2481 -2495 .
[4] 康婷婷, 徐 欢, 张春华, 胡召玲. 区域尺度农田最大光能利用率参数估算及时空变化分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2766 -2774 .
[5] 谢五三, 吴 蓉, 丁小俊. 基于FloodArea模型的城市内涝灾害风险评估与预警[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2848 -2855 .
[6] 刘晓阳 黄晓东 丁志伟. 长江经济带县域信息化水平的空间差异研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[7] 黄玥, 黄志霖, 肖文发, 曾立雄, 马良. 基于Mann-Kendall法的三峡库区长江干流入出库断面水质变化趋势分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 950 -961 .
[8] 韩 静, 芮 旸, 马 滕, 武 鹏, 晁 静. 国家园林县城省际分布格局演化及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 829 -838 .
[9] 胡博亭, 柳江, 王文玲, 冯彦. 基于洪旱灾害的雅鲁藏布江流域水资源脆弱性时空差异分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1092 -1101 .
[10] 葛云健, 吴笑涵. 江苏历史时期洪涝灾害时空分布特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(08): 1998 -2007 .