长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (3): 667-676.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202103014

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

三峡水库蓄水后荆江三口分流量计算方法

陈帮1,李志威2* ,胡旭跃1,朱玲玲3,谭岚4   

  1. (1.长沙理工大学水利工程学院,湖南 长沙410114;2.中国水利水电科学研究院水利部水沙科学与江河治理重点实验实验室,北京 100038;3.长江水利委员会水文局,湖北 武汉430010;4.湖南百舸水利建设股份有限公司,湖南 长沙410007)
  • 出版日期:2021-03-20 发布日期:2021-04-07

An Empirical Method of Diversion Discharge Calculation of the Three Major Outlets of Jingjiang River After the Impoundment of Three Gorges Reservoir

CHEN Bang 1, LI Zhi-wei 2, HU Xu-yue 1, ZHU Lin-lin 3, TAN Lan 4   

  1. (1. School of Hydraulic Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Hydro-Sediment Science and River Training, the Ministry of Water Resources, China Institute of
    Water Resources and Hydropower Research , Beijing 100038, China;3. Bureau of Hydrology, Changjiang Water Resources Commission,
    Wuhan 430010, China;4. Hunan Bestall Water Conservancy Construction Co., Ltd, Changsha 410007, China)
  • Online:2021-03-20 Published:2021-04-07

摘要: 荆江三口河道(藕池河、虎渡河、松滋河)的水沙变化是江湖关系演变的重要内容,其分水分沙变化驱动江湖关系的调整,而且三峡水库蓄水后加剧了三口分流显著减少。通过三口河道的5个水文站2003~2018年水位与流量实测数据分析,考虑口门区水位下降等因素,得到三口河道分流量的经验公式,并量化荆江枯水位下降对三口河道分流量的影响。结果表明:三口分流量是口门区水位的函数,口门区水位下降引起三口河道分流量的同向减少。根据水位与流量关系得到三口五站简化分流量计算公式,进一步考虑口门区水位下降、河道宽度等因素,得到经验分流量与修正分流量的计算公式。采用2017~2018年实测日平均水位值与流量值,验证藕池河管家铺站与康家岗站的分流量经验公式,得到相对误差分别为4.5%与13.7%,验证虎渡河弥陀寺站的相对误差为11.5%,松滋河新江口与沙道观的相对误差值分别为4.5%与7.3%。可知荆江三口分流量的经验公式与实测值符合良好,可作为评估未来受荆江干流水位下降对荆江三口河道分流量的影响。

Abstract: Water and sediment change of the Three Major Outlets River (Ouchi, Hudu, Songzi rivers) to the Dongting Lake from the Jingjiang River in the middle Yangtze River is an important part of the Jingjiang River-Dongting Lake relation which is adjusted by the water-sediment change. The Three Gorges Reservoir has resulted in the significant reduction of diversion discharge in the Three Major Outlets River. Hydrological data (water level and discharge) were collected in five stations (Xinjiangkou and Shadaoguan stations at the Songzi inlet, Mituosi station at the Taipingkou inlet, Guanjiapu and Kangjiagang stations at the Ouchikou inlet) in 2003-2018, to fit five groups of empirical formulae for the diversion discharge calculation incorporating the effect of water level reduction at the inlet. Result shows that the diversion discharge of the Three Major Outlets is mainly a function of the water level in the inlet area. The simplified formulae of diversion discharge obtained are further modified using the channel gradient and water level drop at the inlet area, and channel width. In 2017-2018, the measured data in Guanjiapu and Kangjiagang stations of Ouchi River were used to verify the predicted values, 4.5% and 13.7% of relative error, respectively, 11.5% in the Mituoshi station of Hudu River, and 4.5% and 7.3% in Xinjiangkou and Shadaoguan stations of Songzi River, respectively. In summary, five modified empirical formulae are in good agreement with the measured data, which can be used to estimate the change of diversion discharge of the Three Major Outlets River affected by future water level dropping of the Jingjiang River.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 许 妍|高俊峰|赵家虎. 基于GIS的太湖流域主要生态风险源危险度综合评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(03): 335 .
[2] 张 颖,徐 辉. 基于MCR模型的农村居民点布局适宜性分区及优化模式研究——以南京市六合区金牛湖街道为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2014, 23(11): 1485 .
[3] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[4] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[5] 文高辉 杨钢桥. 耕地细碎化对农地整治农户土地权属调整意愿的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 0, (): 0 .
[6] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .
[7] 畅华仪, 张俊飚, 何可, . 技术感知对农户生物农药采用行为的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 202 -211 .
[8] 邢璐平, 方斌, 向梦杰, . 基于GWR模型的江苏省耕地集约利用水平时空变化特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 376 -386 .
[9] 罗燊, 余斌, 张向敏. 乡村生活空间网络结构特征与优化——以江汉平原典型乡建片区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(07): 1725 -1735 .
[10] 汪登强, 高雷, 段辛斌, 陈大庆, 孟秋, 刘绍平. 汉江下游鱼类早期资源及梯级联合生态调度对鱼类繁殖影响的初步分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(08): 1909 -1917 .