长江流域资源与环境 >> 2021, Vol. 30 >> Issue (9): 2299-2310.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202109023

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    

多主体协同治理下茶农绿色生产绩效

于艳丽1,2,李桦2*   

  1. (1.宁夏大学经济管理学院,宁夏 银川 750021;2. 西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西 杨凌 712100)
  • 出版日期:2021-09-20 发布日期:2021-09-27

Performance Analysis of Tea Farmers' Green Production Under Multi-agent Collaborative Governance

YU Yan-li 1,2,LI Hua 2   

  1. (1.Ningxia University, Economics Management School, Yinchuan 750021,China;2.Northwest Agricultural & Forestry University,College of Economics Management, Yangling 712100, China)
  • Online:2021-09-20 Published:2021-09-27

摘要: 多主体协同治理对推进农业绿色发展及乡村振兴战略具有重要意义。以茶叶地理标志保护为例,采用DEA-HR模型分析地理标志保护多主体合作博弈及协同绩效。结果表明:现阶段地理标志保护主体(监管部门、茶厂、茶农)合作不完全;保护主体协调度仅为0.64,处于“初级协调发展型”阶段,茶厂与茶农成为拉低整体协调度的短板;进一步运用门槛模型揭示茶厂与茶农协调度低的关键因素在于监管部门的质量检测强度弱、茶农的品牌了解程度低,同时测出茶厂与茶农的经营规模存在门槛效应。为提高地理标志保护主体协同绩效,政府应协同其他主体强化农产品质量检测,加强地理标志保护宣传力度,构建以市场监管为主、政府规制为辅的地理标志保护主体协同治理策略。

Abstract: Multi-agent collaborative governance in agricultural products is great significance to promoting the green development of agriculture. Based on the green production data of tea industry in geographical indication protection area, this paper starts from the cooperative game of geographical indication protection participation and its synergistic performance for the first time. From the two perspectives of game theory and synergy theory, this paper analyzes the incentives of the participants of GI protection to green tea production. The research shows that the cooperation of the main body of geographical indication protection is not complete at present; the coordination degree is only 0.64, which is at the level of “coordinated and generally effective”. The tea factory and the tea farmers have become the shortcomings to decrease the overall coordination degree. The model verification shows that the quality inspection system and the understanding of public brands are to supervise and encourage tea factories and tea farmers to improve the efficiency of geographical indication protection. In order to improve the coordinated performance of geographical indication protection, the government should build a coordinated management system for geographical indication protection entities supplemented by market and government intervention.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] 熊鸿斌, 周凌燕. 基于PSR-灰靶模型的巢湖环湖防洪治理工程生态环境影响评价研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 1977 -1987 .
[3] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[4] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[5] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[6] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[7] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[8] 赵树成, 张展羽, 夏继红, 杨洁, 盛丽婷, 唐丹, 陈晓安, . 鄱阳湖滨岸土壤磷素吸附特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .
[9] 阮甜, 查芊郁, 杨茹, 高超. 全球升温1.5℃和2.0℃对长江寸滩站以上流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 407 -415 .
[10] 邵祎婷, 何毅, 穆兴民, 高鹏, 赵广举, 孙文义, . 秦巴山区降雨侵蚀力时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 416 -425 .