长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (11): 2404-2415.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202211007

• 区域可持续发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

汉江生态经济带交通状况-区域经济-生态环境耦合协调发展研究

陆远权1,2,张  源1*   

  1. (1.重庆大学公共管理学院,重庆 400044;2.重庆师范大学经济与管理学院,重庆 401331)
  • 出版日期:2022-11-20 发布日期:2022-12-26

Research on Coupling Coordination Development of Traffic Condition-Regional Economy-Ecological Environment in Hanjiang River Ecological Economy Belt

LU Yuan-quan1,2,ZHANG Yuan1   

  1. (1.School of Public Policy and Administration,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,China;2.School of Economics and Management,Chongqing Normal University,Chongqing 401331,China)
  • Online:2022-11-20 Published:2022-12-26

摘要: 汉江生态经济带是长江流域横贯东西的新兴经济带,在区域协调发展格局中具有独特且不可替代的战略地位。基于汉江生态经济带13个地级市2009~2019年的面板数据,引入耦合协调模型,在建立汉江生态经济带交通状况-区域经济-生态环境耦合协调发展评价指标体系的基础上,对汉江生态经济带三大系统的耦合协调发展进行综合实证分析。研究发现:(1)汉江生态经济带交通状况-区域经济-生态环境整体耦合协调性呈波动上升趋势,交通状况综合发展水平和区域经济综合发展水平滞后于生态环境综合保护水平。(2)各地级市三大系统综合发展水平参差不齐,武汉交通状况和区域经济综合发展水平遥遥领先,其次为洛阳、襄阳和南阳,其余城市相对落后;各城市生态环境综合保护水平波动较大,整体呈现先上升、后下降、再上升的态势。(3)各地级市三大系统耦合协调度变动以保持稳定和波动上升为主,总体向良性协调方向发展,区域差异有所缓和。

Abstract: Hanjiang river ecological economy belt is an emerging economic belt across the east and west of the Yangtze River Basin,which has a unique and irreplaceable strategic position in the pattern of regional coordination development. Based on the panel data of 13 prefecture-level cities in Hanjiang river ecological economy belt from 2009 to 2019,this paper introduces the coupling coordination model and constructs a coupling coordination index system of traffic conditions-regional economy-ecological environment in Hanjiang river ecological economy belt to make a comprehensive empirical analysis on coupling coordination development of the three systems in Hanjiang river ecological economy belt. The results show that:(1)the overall coupling coordination of traffic condition-regional economy-ecological environment in Hanjiang river ecological economy belt shows a fluctuating upward trend,and the evaluation level of traffic condition and regional economy lags behind the evaluation level of ecological environment. (2)The comprehensive development level of the three systems between cities is uneven. For the evaluation level of traffic condition and regional economic,Wuhan is far ahead,followed by Luoyang,Xiangyang and Nanyang,and the rest of the cities are relatively backward. While the level of ecological environmental assessment in each city fluctuates greatly with a overall rising-falling-rising trend. (3)For each prefecture-level city,the coupling coordination degree of the three systems experienced stable or fluctuant ascent,generally developing in the direction of benign coordination and eased regional differences.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 庄汝龙, 宓科娜, 梁龙武. 中国工业废水排放格局及其驱动因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1765 .
[2] 崔鑫 靳文佳 王永杰 周立旻 郑祥民. 上海市公园湖泊表层沉积物中汞的特征及其污染评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 吴浪, 周廷刚, 温莉, 刘晓璐, 朱晓波. 基于遥感数据的PM2.5与城市化的时空关系研究——以成渝城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2142 -2152 .
[4] 唐恩斌, 张梅青.  

高铁背景下城市铁路可达性与空间相互作用格局——以江西省为例 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2241 -2249 .

[5] 顾铮鸣, 金晓斌, 沈春竹, 金志丰, 周寅康. 近15a江苏省水源涵养功能时空变化与影响因素探析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2453 -2462 .
[6] 王 冰, 程 婷. 我国中部城市环境全要素生产率的时空演变——基于Malmquist-Luenberger生产率指数分解方法[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 48 -59 .
[7] 王刚毅, 刘 杰. 基于改进水生态足迹的水资源环境与经济发展协调性评价——以中原城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 80 -90 .
[8] 陈国磊, 田玲玲, 罗静, 蒋亮, 吴益坤, . 长江经济带城市黑臭水体空间分布格局及影响因子[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1003 -1014 .
[9] 魏建飞 程迪 丁志伟 李燕菲 张浩. 2019年7期安徽省镇域经济发展水平的时空分异及空间格局影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[10] 窦小东, 黄玮, 易琦, 李蒙, 李忠良. LUCC及气候变化对李仙江流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(06): 1481 -1490 .