长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (2): 379-386.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202202012

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带生态环境高质量实现路径研究 ——以南京为例


于忠华1,孙瑞玲1,秦海旭1,姚利鹏1,程檀青2
  

  1. (1.南京市生态环境保护科学研究院,江苏 南京 210013;2.南京市生态环境局,江苏 南京 210000)
  • 出版日期:2022-02-20 发布日期:2022-03-21

Research on High Quality of Ecological Environment in Yangtze River Economic Belt:A Case Study of Nanjing City

YU Zhong-hua1 ,SUN Rui-ling1, QIN Hai-xu1, YAO Li-peng1, CHENG Tan-qing2   

  1. (1.Nanjing Academy of Ecology and Environment Protection Science, Nanjing 210013,China;2.Nanjing Municipal Ecological and Environment Bureau,Nanjing 210000,China)
  • Online:2022-02-20 Published:2022-03-21

摘要: 基于优化环境政策制定及实施目的,建立“多视角绩效分析—多情景方案比选—多主体参与治理”的逻辑分析框架,以长江三角洲特大城市南京为例,多视角评估了2003~2018年南京市环境治理绩效,设计了3 种发展情景并分析了不同情境下生态环境高质量制约条件及实现路径,基于利益相关方理论提出多主体参与治理的实施路径。研究结果表明:大气环境质量优于京津冀地区城市但与珠三角城市差距明显,PM2.5和PM10波动改善但尚未达到国家标准,O3空气污染日益凸显,水环境质量持续改善且已无劣Ⅴ类断面;研究时段内南京市工业经济增长与废水和固体废物基本实现脱钩但与废气尚未脱钩;重点行业环境绩效改善方面电力企业表现较好而钢铁、化工企业表现较差。在给定2025年高质量环境目标下,采取协调发展策略推动经济环境协调发展、开展多种污染物协同治理、推动党委政府企业公众多主体协作,有助于实现长江经济带生态环境高质量目标。

Abstract: To optimizing the environmental policy making and implementing.Logical analysis frame including evaluated multiple dimensions environmental performance,analyzed multiple scenario and multi-agent implement were designed.Taking Nanjing as example,multiple dimensions environmental performance of Nanjing from 2003 to 2018 was evaluated,three different development scenarios were designed, and the policy demand and paths of high quality of ecological environment were analyzed, and based on the stakeholders theory multi-agent implement was structured.The results show that, the quality of atmospheric environment was better than the city of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region,and was worse than the city of Pearl River Delta.There is a growing tendency in environment quality of PM2.5 and PM10 ,but they were not up to the second of atmospheric environment standard(GB3095-2012),and O3 become more and more polluted, There is a growing tendency in environment quality of water environment,and no worse section than V quality.The decoupling condition between industrial economic and waste water and solid waste emission were in the condition of decoupling in general from 2003 to 2018,but exhaust was in the condition of coupling.The environmental performance of power plant is good,and chemical industry and ironworks is worse.Based on the high target of Yangtze Economic Belt with ecological environment high quality in 2025, coordinated development should be accepted,multiple pollutants should be in synergetic treatment,and multi-agent involving government,company and public should be in cooperative governance.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 蒋豫. 太湖流域沉积物中有机氯农药空间分布特征及风险评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[2] 卢德彬 毛婉柳 杨东阳 赵佳楠. 基于多源遥感数据的中国PM2.5变化趋势与影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[3] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[4] 王凯, 王玉杰, 王彬, 张守红, 王云琦, 王晨沣. 黄壤坡面土壤分离速率研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2114 -2121 .
[5] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .
[6] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[7] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[8] 畅华仪, 张俊飚, 何可, . 技术感知对农户生物农药采用行为的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 202 -211 .
[9] 阮甜, 查芊郁, 杨茹, 高超. 全球升温1.5℃和2.0℃对长江寸滩站以上流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 407 -415 .
[10] 邵祎婷, 何毅, 穆兴民, 高鹏, 赵广举, 孙文义, . 秦巴山区降雨侵蚀力时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 416 -425 .