长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (4): 878-889.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202204015

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

长江经济带三大城市群PM2.5时空分布特征及影响因素研究

周侗,张帅倩*,闫金伟,吴义豪,武奇,陶菲   

  1. (南通大学地理科学学院, 江苏 南通 226007)
  • 出版日期:2022-04-20 发布日期:2022-04-21

Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics of PM2.5 and Its Influencing Factors of the Three Urban Agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

ZHOU Tong, ZHANG Shuai-qian, YAN Jin-wei, WU Yi-hao, WU Qi, TAO Fei   

  1. (School of Geographical Science, Nantong University, Nantong 226007, China)
  • Online:2022-04-20 Published:2022-04-21

摘要: 基于国控点发布的2017~2019年PM2.5数据,综合运用空间自相关分析法、地理探测器和混合地理加权回归(MGWR)等方法,对长江经济带三大城市群PM2.5浓度进行多空间尺度、多影响指标和多分析模型的综合研究。结果表明:(1)长江经济带三大城市群的PM2.5浓度总体上呈下降趋势,长江三角洲城市群三年平均PM2.5浓度值最低,长江中游城市群三年平均PM2.5浓度最高,但下降幅度最大,成渝城市群三年内空气质量在三大城市群中处于中等水平。(2)在季节尺度上,春冬季PM2.5浓度值较高,夏秋季较低。(3)空间视角,长江以北空气污染较长江以南更为严重,长江三角洲城市群东部和南部的空气质量优于该城市群的其他地区,长江中游城市群西北部空气质量较差,成渝城市群东部空气质量较好。(4)PM2.5浓度的影响因素主要包括气象因素和社会经济因素。社会经济因素中,城镇化率是2017~2019年PM2.5污染的最主要影响因子,其次为规模以上工业企业。气象因素中,总降水量、最高气温等因素对PM2.5污染有较强的削弱作用。总体上,现阶段城市化进程对PM2.5污染的影响程度较大。


Abstract: The present study used spatial autocorrelation analysis, geo-detector and mixed geographically weighted regression (MGWR) methods to analyze the 2017-2019 PM2.5 data of three urban agglomerations along the Yangtze River Economic Belt under the National Monitoring System and established multiple spatial scales, multiple impact indicators and multiple analysis models for a comprehensive assessment of the PM2.5 concentrations. The results showed that: (1) The PM2.5 concentration in the three urban agglomerations had a generally downward trend over the three years. The average PM2.5 concentration in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration was the lowest for the three years under the study, and the average PM2.5 concentration in the Yangtze River Middle-Reach urban agglomeration was the highest for the three years, but the decline was the largest. The air quality in the Cheng-Yu urban agglomeration was overall between the levels of the two aforementioned agglomerations. (2) On the seasonal scale, PM2.5 concentration was higher in the spring and winter, but lower in summer and autumn. (3) From the spatial perspective, air pollution in the north of the Yangtze River was more severe than that in the south of the Yangtze River. The air quality in the eastern and southern parts of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration was better than that in other regions of the same agglomeration. The air quality in the northwest part was worse than other regions of the Yangtze River Middle-Reach urban agglomeration, and for the Cheng-Yu urban agglomeration, the air quality in the eastern part was better. (4) Meteorological elements and socio-economic status were the main factors affecting the PM2.5 concentration. Among social and economic factors, the urbanization rate was found to be most impactful for PM2.5 pollution from 2017 to 2019, followed by industrial enterprises above designated size. Among meteorological factors, total precipitation, maximum temperature and other factors showed a strong weakening effect on PM2.5 pollution. In general, the current urbanization process had a greater impact on PM2.5 pollution.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李建豹, 黄贤金, 孟 浩, 周 艳, 徐国良, 吴常艳. “十二五”时期中国碳排放强度累积目标完成率分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1655 .
[2] 李嘉译, 匡鸿海, 谭 超, 王佩佩. 长江经济带城市扩张的时空特征与生态响应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2153 -2161 .
[3] 冯 畅, 毛德华, 周 慧, 曹艳敏, 胡光伟. 流域绿水管理博弈建模及应用分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2505 -2517 .
[4] 唐子珺, 陈龙, 覃军, 郑翔. 武汉市一次污染过程的局地流场和边界层结构的数值模拟[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2540 -2547 .
[5] 王东香, 张一鸣, 王锐诚, 赵炳炎, 张志麒, 黄咸雨, . 神农架大九湖泥炭地孔隙水溶解有机碳特征及其影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2568 -2577 .
[6] 王海力, 韩光中, 谢贤健. 基于DEA模型的西南地区耕地利用效率时空格局演变及影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2784 -2795 .
[7] 汪聪聪, 王益澄, 马仁锋, 王静敏. 经济集聚对雾霾污染影响的空间计量研究——以长三角洲地区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 1 -11 .
[8] 赵树成, 张展羽, 夏继红, 杨洁, 盛丽婷, 唐丹, 陈晓安, . 鄱阳湖滨岸土壤磷素吸附特征研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 166 -174 .
[9] 阮甜, 查芊郁, 杨茹, 高超. 全球升温1.5℃和2.0℃对长江寸滩站以上流域径流的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 407 -415 .
[10] 邵祎婷, 何毅, 穆兴民, 高鹏, 赵广举, 孙文义, . 秦巴山区降雨侵蚀力时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 416 -425 .