长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (7): 1534-1547.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202207011

• 自然资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

2000~2020年岷江上游植被NDVI时空变化及其地形响应

向珈瑶1,2,彭文甫1,2*,陶帅1,2   

  1. (1. 四川师范大学地理与资源科学学院,四川 成都 610068;
    2. 四川师范大学西南土地资源评价与监测教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610068)
  • 出版日期:2022-07-20 发布日期:2022-08-22

Spatio-temporal Changes of Vegetation NDVI and Its Topographic Response in the#br#  Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River from 2000 to 2020

XIANG Jia-yao1,2, PENG Wen-fu1,2, TAO Shuai1,2   

  1. (1. School of Geography and Resource Science, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610068,China; 2. Key Laboratory of Southwest Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring, Ministry of Education, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610068,China)
  • Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-08-22

摘要: 岷江上游地区承载着不可替代的资源支撑、生态服务与环境调节功能,是国家生态红线的水土流失敏感主控区域,也是国家生存与发展重要的自然基础。目前,该区域生态和经济社会过程在空间上的叠加,不仅影响到资源、环境与生态等功能的发挥,而且对岷江流域乃至长江上游的生态安全和区域的可持续发展均构成严重威胁。认识和理解岷江上游植被NDVI时空变化及其地形响应机制,分析植被变化最佳地形位,可以为该地区生态环境建设提供方向指引与科学参考。综合运用遥感与GIS技术对岷江上游植被NDVI时空变化进行分析,并通过空间叠加分析详细探讨了植被NDVI时空变化对海拔、坡度、坡向与地形起伏度等地形因子的响应,结合不同植被变化类型的分布指数进一步明确了不同地形因子背景下植被变化地域分异规律,得出了不同植被变化类型最佳地形位。结果表明:(1)2000~2020年间,岷江上游地区植被覆盖良好且格局稳定,主要沿河谷地带扩散状分布约有26.62%的区域植被显著增长,仅有1.21%的区域植被显著退化;(2)植被变化趋势类型在高程、坡度、坡向与地形起伏度等不同地形位下具有显著不同的分布格局,整体而言不同地形位下面积占比波动较小,分布指数各异;(3)植被显著退化区域的最佳地形位分别为受人类活动影响的“优势”地带与受自然条件制约的“劣势”地带,植被显著增长区域的最佳地形位主要分布在海拔相对较低,而坡度、起伏度较大且为阴坡的人类聚落辐射区域。

Abstract: The upper reaches of Minjiang River play important roles in resource support, ecological service, and environmental regulation. It is the soil erosion sensitive control region of the national ecological red line and an important natural basis for the survival and development of the country. At present, the spatial superposition of the ecological, economical, and social processes in this region not only affects resources, environmental, and ecological functions but also poses a serious threat to the ecological security and regional sustainable development of the Minjiang River basin and even the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. Recognizing and understanding the temporal and spatial variation of vegetation Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and its topographic response mechanism in the upper reaches of Minjiang River and analyzing the best topographic position of vegetation changes can provide direction, guidance, and scientific reference for ecological environmental construction in this region. In this study, the spatial and temporal changes of vegetation NDVI in the upper reaches of Minjiang River were analyzed using remote sensing and GIS technology. Through spatial overlay analysis, the response of spatial-temporal variation of NDVI to topographic factors such as elevation, slope, aspect, and topographic relief was discussed in detail. Combined with the distribution index of different types of vegetation change, the regional differentiation rule of vegetation change under the background of different topographic factors was further defined, and the best topographic position of different types of vegetation change was obtained. The results showed that: (1) vegetation coverage in the upper reaches of Minjiang River was good and stable, and approximately 26.62% of the vegetation increased significantly, while only 1.21% of the vegetation decreased significantly during 2000-2020. (2) The types of vegetation change had significantly different distribution patterns under different topographic positions, such as elevation, slope, aspect, and relief degree. Overall, the area proportion fluctuated slightly under different topographic positions, and the distribution index was different. (3) The best topographic position of the regions with significant vegetation degradation was the "dominant" zone, which was affected by human activities and the "inferior" zone, which was restricted by natural conditions. The best topographic position of the regions with significant vegetation growth was mainly distributed in the areas with relatively low elevation, large slope, and relief and shady slope of human settlement radiation.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 璐, 董 捷, 张俊峰. 长江经济带城市土地利用效率地区差异及形成机理[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1666 .
[2] 钟业喜, 傅 钰, 朱治州, 王晓静.  基于母子企业联系的上市公司网络结构研究——以长江中游城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1725 .
[3] 陆砚池 方世明. 均衡和效率双重视角下武汉市主城区公园绿地空间布局优化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[4] 危小建 陈竹安 张蕾 江平 吴芳. 引入城市扩张干扰效应的生态服务价值化方法改进[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 胡森林 滕堂伟 袁华锡 周灿. 长三角城市群汽车企业空间集聚与发展绩效[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 沈雪, 张露, 张俊飚, 骆兰翎. 稻农低碳生产行为影响因素与引导策略——基于人际行为改进理论的多组比较分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2042 -2052 .
[7] 马坤, 唐晓岚, 刘思源, 王奕文, 任宇杰, 刘小涵. 长江流域国家级保护地空间分布特征及其国家公园廊道空间策略研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(09): 2053 -2069 .
[8] 张小峰, 闫昊晨, 岳遥, 卢雅婷.  

50年金沙江各区段年径流量变化及分析 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2283 -2292 .

[9] 刘红光 陈敏 唐志鹏. 基于灰水足迹的长江经济带水资源生态补偿标准研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[10] 程谅, 郭忠录, 秦嘉惠. 长期施肥对小麦—玉米轮作红壤抗蚀性的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 212 -221 .