长江流域资源与环境 >> 2022, Vol. 31 >> Issue (7): 1616-1626.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202207018

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

江汉平原四湖流域生境质量时空演化及预测

夏盈1,2, 张莹莹3, 厉恩华1*, 蔡晓斌1, 杨超1, 杨娇1,2   

  1. (1.中国科学院精密测量科学与技术创新研究院,环境与灾害监测评估湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430077;2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049;3.郑州师范学院地理与旅游学院,河南 郑州 450044)
  • 出版日期:2022-07-20 发布日期:2022-08-22

Spatio-temporal Evolution and Prediction of Habitat Quality in Four Lakes Basin of Jianghan Plain

XIA Ying1,2, ZHANG Ying-ying3, LI En-hua1, CAI Xiao-bin1,YANG Chao1, YANG Jiao1,2   

  1. (1.Key Laboratory for Environment and Disaster Monitoring and Evaluation of Hubei Province,Innovation Academy
    for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China;
    2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;3. School of Geography and Tourism, 
    Zhengzhou Normal University, Zhengzhou 450044, China)
  • Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-08-22

摘要: 评价生境质量对区域生物多样性保护和生态环境的可持续发展具有重要意义,通过InVEST模型和空间自相关分析、热点分析方法探索2000~2020年间江汉平原四湖流域生境质量的时空变化,综合 CA-Markov和InVEST模型模拟不同情景模式下的2030年四湖流域生境质量情况。研究发现:(1)四湖流域生境质量空间分布呈现西北、东南高,中部低的特点,生境质量呈持续下降趋势,生境质量平均值由2000年的0.497 7下降至2020年的0.484 2,生境退化强度增强,近20年间的生境退化指数最大值由0.155 5上升至0.159 3,空间上扩散趋势明显;(2)生境质量与生境退化具有显著的空间集聚性,皆具有明显的冷热点;(3)相较于自然变化情景下的生境质量和退化程度结果,生态保护情景的退化强度较弱,生境质量得以改善,表明在实施生态保护措施的影响下有利于区域的生物多样性保护和提高生态系统服务功能。

Abstract: The evaluation of habitat quality is of great significance to the protection of regional biodiversity and the sustainable development of ecological environment. This study explored the spatiotemporal changes of habitat quality in Four Lakes Basin of Jianghan Plain from 2000 to 2020 by means of invest model, spatial autocorrelation analysis and hotspot analysis, and integrated CA-Markov and InVEST models to simulate the habitat quality in 2030 under different scenarios. The results show that: (1) the spatial distribution of habitat quality degree in Four Lakes Basin is high in Northwest and Southeast, and low in central. The average value of habitat quality is decreasing from 0.497 7 in 2000 to 0.484 2 in 2020, and the intensity of habitat degradation is increasing. The maximum value of habitat degradation index is increasing from 0.155 5 to 0.159 3 in recent 20 years, and the spatial diffusion trend is obvious;(2) Habitat quality and habitat degradation have significant spatial agglomeration, with obvious cold and hot spots;(3) Compared with the results of habitat quality and habitat degradation degree under natural change scenario, the degradation intensity of ecological protection scenario is weaker, and the habitat quality is improved, which indicates that the implementation of ecological protection measures is conducive to the protection of regional biodiversity and the improvement of ecosystem services.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 璐, 董 捷, 张俊峰. 长江经济带城市土地利用效率地区差异及形成机理[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1666 .
[2] 钟业喜, 傅 钰, 朱治州, 王晓静.  基于母子企业联系的上市公司网络结构研究——以长江中游城市群为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1725 .
[3] 陆砚池 方世明. 均衡和效率双重视角下武汉市主城区公园绿地空间布局优化研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[4] 危小建 陈竹安 张蕾 江平 吴芳. 引入城市扩张干扰效应的生态服务价值化方法改进[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 胡森林 滕堂伟 袁华锡 周灿. 长三角城市群汽车企业空间集聚与发展绩效[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 文高辉 杨钢桥. 耕地细碎化对农地整治农户土地权属调整意愿的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 张小峰, 闫昊晨, 岳遥, 卢雅婷.  

50年金沙江各区段年径流量变化及分析 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2283 -2292 .

[8] 刘红光 陈敏 唐志鹏. 基于灰水足迹的长江经济带水资源生态补偿标准研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[9] 程谅, 郭忠录, 秦嘉惠. 长期施肥对小麦—玉米轮作红壤抗蚀性的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 212 -221 .
[10] 邢璐平, 方斌, 向梦杰, . 基于GWR模型的江苏省耕地集约利用水平时空变化特征及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 376 -386 .