长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (11): 2443-2452.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202311018

• 农业发展 • 上一篇    

基于定位试验监测的三种施肥方式对稻田灰水足迹的影响

邵建均1,陈瑾2,姜培坤3,邬建红3*   

  1. (1.浙江省耕地质量与肥料管理总站,浙江 杭州 310020;2.浙江省桐乡市农业农村局,浙江 桐乡314500;
    3.浙江农林大学环境与资源学院、碳中和学院,浙江 杭州 311300)
  • 出版日期:2023-11-20 发布日期:2023-11-28

Effects of Three Fertilization Types on Grey Water  Footprint in Paddy Fields Based on Field Experimental Data

SHAO Jian-yun1, CHEN Jin2, JIANG Pei-kun3, WU Jian-hong3   

  1. (1.Cultivated Land Quality and Fertilizer Management Central Station, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310020, China; 
    2. Bureau of Agricultural and Rural Affairs of Tongxiang County, Zhejiang Province, Tongxiang 314500, China;
    3. College of Environmental and Resources Sciences, College of Carbon Neutrality, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)
  • Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-11-28

摘要: 灰水足迹(GWF)方法是定量评价农业生产过程对水环境影响的有效途径。传统的作物生产灰水足迹计算通常采用粗略的估算方法,无法精确量化施肥类型导致的灰水足迹差异。通过田间试验观测常规施肥(CF)、炭基肥(BF)和有机肥部分替代化肥处理(OF)下稻田的水肥迁移过程,识别各径流事件的关键污染物,探讨不同施肥类型下GWF的变化。结果表明:(1)与CF处理相比,BF处理和OF处理均减少了总氮、硝态氮、铵态氮、总磷污染物的流失量,且分别增产3.48%和6.81%。(2)研究期内发生的所有径流事件中,总氮成为关键污染物的频率最大,总磷在某些情形下也是关键污染物,决定灰水产生量的关键污染物具有变异性。(3)肥料类型显著影响水稻生长过程中产生的GWF值,均表现为CF(622.85 m3·t-1) > BF (367.68 m3·t-1)> OF(318.18 m3·t-1)。有机肥部分替代化肥降低了水稻生产灰水足迹且提高了产量,能较好的实现减污增产。基于试验的作物生产灰水足迹计算方法能够准确定量不同施肥类型对灰水足迹的影响。

Abstract: Grey water footprint (GWF) can be used as an indicator to quantitatively evaluate the impact of agricultural production process on water environment. Traditional methods for calculating GWF of crop production are usually based on rough estimation, which cannot accurately quantify the difference between GWFs caused by fertilizer types. In this study, field experiments were conducted to observe the migration process of water and fertilizer in paddy field under conventional fertilization (CF), biochar-based fertilizer (BF) and organic fertilizer partially replacing chemical fertilizer (OF) treatments. This study aimed to identify the most critical pollutants for each runoff event and to explore the changes in the GWF under different fertilization types. The results showed that: (1) Compared with CF treatment the BF treatment and OF treatment both reduced the pollutant losses of total nitrogen, nitrate nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen and total phosphorus, and increased rice yields by 3.48% and 6.81%, respectively. (2) In all runoff events produced during the study period, the occurring frequency of total nitrogen as the key pollutant was the highest, while total phosphorus was also critical pollutants under certain circumstances, implying that the key pollutant determining the amount of grey water was variant. (3) The impacts of fertilizer typeson the GWF of rice production were in the order of: CF (622.85 m3/t) > BF (367.68 m3/t) > OF (318.18 m3/t). OF reduced the grey water footprint of rice production and increased the rice yield, which help achieve the goal of pollution reduction and yield increase. The method for calculating GWF of crop production based on field measurements can accurately quantify the influence of different fertilizer types on grey water footprint.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 袁博, 郭梦京, 周孝德, 郑兴. 气候变化及人类活动对河流溶解性有机质(DOM)影响的研究进展[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1440 .
[2] 廖炜, 李璐, 杨伟, 吴宜进. 城镇化过程中的流域面源污染时空变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1776 .
[3] 卢德彬 毛婉柳 杨东阳 赵佳楠. 基于多源遥感数据的中国PM2.5变化趋势与影响因素分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[4] 奚世军 安裕伦 李阳兵 蔡沛伶 李瑞 龙立美 陈啟英. 基于景观格局的喀斯特山区流域生态风险评估 ——以贵州省乌江流域为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[5] 张亚飞 廖和平 李义龙. 基于反规划与FLUS模型的城市增长边界划定研究——以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[6] 胡继亮 熊自洁 张悦 高婷. 2019年2期自然灾害水平对农户投保意愿的影响分析——基于湖北微观调查数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[7] 秦立 吴起鑫. 赤水河流域土地利用结构对氮素输出的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, , (): 0 .
[8] 潘超, 周驰, 苗滕, 刘林峰, 高健, 焦一滢, 李祝, 张佳敏, 王卉君, 徐德雄. 长江流域鄂西四河流大型底栖动物群落结构特征及水质生物学评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2529 -2539 .
[9] 顿佳耀, 王初, 姚东京, 黄敏慧, 许金鑫. 崇明东滩盐沼表层沉积物有机碳空间分布特征及其来源示踪研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 157 -165 .
[10] 畅华仪, 张俊飚, 何可, . 技术感知对农户生物农药采用行为的影响研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 202 -211 .