长江流域资源与环境 >> 2023, Vol. 32 >> Issue (6): 1281-1290.doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202306015

• 生态环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄱阳湖入长江口流域水体重金属分布特征及人体健康风险评价

王志刚1,2,詹华明2,3*,徐力刚4*,郭豪坤2,李佳乐5   

  1. (1.天津铁道职业技术学院,天津 300241; 2.天津市地质研究和海洋地质中心,天津 300170; 3.华北地质勘查局第四地质大队,河北 秦皇岛 066000; 4.中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所,江苏 南京 210008; 5.东华理工大学,江西 南昌 330013)
  • 出版日期:2023-06-20 发布日期:2023-06-21

Distribution of Heavy Metal and Human Health Risk Assessment of Water Bodies in the Basin of Poyang Lake Into the Yangtze River

WANG Zhi-gang1,2, ZHAN Hua-ming2,3, XU Li-gang4, GUO Hao-kun2, LI Jia-le5   

  1. (1.Tianjin Railway Technical and Vocational College,Tianjin 300241, China; 2. Tianjin Geology Research and Marine Geological Center,Tianjin 300170, China; 3. The Fourth Geological Brigade of North China Geological Survey Bureau, Qinhuangdao 066000, China; 4.Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; 5.East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)
  • Online:2023-06-20 Published:2023-06-21

摘要: 通过采集鄱阳湖入长江口流域地表和地下水体,并对水体中重金属空间分布特征和来源进行分析,评价了水体重金属对人体健康风险。研究区水体主要阳离子为Ca2+,主要阴离子为HCO3-、SO42-,地下水水化学成分的主要成因为水岩相互作用。地表水重金属平均浓度高低顺序为Cr>Fe>Zn>Pb>Cu>Mn,Cr浓度变化幅度最大,Cr与Fe在地表水中重金属总浓度中的贡献率最大,分别为54.36%和19.50%。地下水重金属平均浓度高低顺序为Mn>Fe>Cr>Zn>Pb>Cu。研究区重金属污染可能来源于研究区周围冶炼厂排污废水和城市工业排放的污废水。地表水体和地下水体中, Cr对人体健康的风险均最高。 地表水体中Cr对儿童的HQder、HI>1,Pb次之。地下水体中,Cr对人体的HQder、HI>1,Mn次之。研究为鄱阳湖流域地下水资源保护与饮用水水安全提供科学依据。

Abstract: Samples were collected in 2022 in the basin of Poyang Lake into the Yangtze River to analyze the spatial distribution characteristics and sources of heavy metals in the surface water and groundwater and to evaluate the risk of heavy metals to human health. The major cations and anions in the water from the study area were Ca2+, and HCO3- and SO42-, respectively. Water-rock interaction was the primary source of the chemical components of groundwater. The average concentration of heavy metals in the surface water was in the order of Cr>Fe>Zn>Pb>Cu>Mn. Cr concentration had the most significant variation range. Cr and Fe contributed the most to the total concentration of heavy metals in surface water, accounting for 54.36% and 19.50%, respectively. The average concentration of heavy metals in groundwater was in the order of Mn>Fe>Cr>Zn>Pb>Cu. Heavy metal pollution in the study area may come from wastewater discharged from smelters and urban industries. Cr had the highest risk to human health in both surface water and groundwater. The HQder and HI values of Cr in surface water were >1, followed by Pb. The HQder and HI values of Cr in groundwater were >1, followed by Mn. This study provides a scientific basis for the protection of groundwater resources and the safety of drinking water in Poyang Lake Basin.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚琳, 沈竞, 温新龙, 高超. WRF模式参数化方案对江西山地风电场的风模拟研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(07): 1380 .
[2] 孙惠惠, 章新平, 罗紫东, 尚程鹏, 贺新光, 饶志国.  近53 a来长江流域极端降水指数特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(08): 1879 .
[3] 方琳, 吴凤平, 王新华, 余燕团.  

基于共同前沿SBM模型的农业用水效率测度及改善潜力 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(10): 2293 -2304 .

[4] 周晟吕, 李月寒, 胡 静, 封竞男. 基于问卷调查的上海市大气环境质量改善的支付意愿研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(11): 2419 -2424 .
[5] 屈小娥. 中国生态效率的区域差异及影响因素——基于时空差异视角的实证分析[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(12): 2673 -2683 .
[6] 吕乐婷, 王晓蕊, 孙才志, 张 杰. 基于SWAT模型的细河流域蓝水绿水资源量时空分布研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(01): 39 -47 .
[7] 李艳, 马百胜, 杨宣. 两类ENSO事件对中国东部地区极端降水的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(02): 469 -482 .
[8] 张亚飞, 廖和平, 李义龙, . 基于反规划与FLUS模型的城市增长边界划定研究——以重庆市渝北区为例[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 757 -767 .
[9] 柯杭, 王小军, 尹义星, 罗志文, . 衡水市1961~2015年极端降水和干旱的时空变化特征[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(04): 971 -980 .
[10] 钟业喜, 郭卫东, 毛炜圣, 王晓静, 冯兴华. 闽新轴带城市铁路网络及可达性演变研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(05): 1015 -1024 .